美债收益率创24年新高,欧洲主权债务危机风险上升
Could High US Bond Yields Spark a Crisis in Europe? | Big Take
直击当前宏观核心矛盾:美债收益率突破关键点位引发的跨资产重估。重点梳理了美债对欧洲(法德利差)和日本的主权债务传导机制,以及对企业融资和居民端的具体冲击,数据详实,逻辑清晰,适合关注宏观风险敞口的投资者深入阅读。
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news. The tenure has just broken through another level.
彭博音频工作室、播客、广播、新闻。任期刚刚突破了另一个层次。
Bloomberg Opinions John Authors came into the studio Monday morning just as the 10-year bond yield hit 5.3%.
彭博观点约翰作者周一早上进入演播室,当时10年期国债收益率触及5.3%。
So, it's now at a 24-year high. So, it's gone higher than it ever did in the spike that precipitated the financial crisis. Wow. Are we at a crisis moment when it comes to bond yields
所以,现在达到了24年来的高点。所以,它比引发金融危机的飙升时期还要高。哇。在债券收益率方面,我们是否处于危机时刻?
in the US? No. In the case of France, you have a very imminent signs of a potential crisis in Japan and also in the UK.
在美国吗?不。在法国的情况下,你看到了非常迫在眉睫的潜在危机迹象,在日本和英国也是如此。
I'm Sarah Holder and this is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. Today on the show, I sit down with John and Heather Long, the chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union to talk about where bond yields are rising, how central banks around the world could respond, and how consumers in the US are feeling the pressure. So, we've been talking a lot on the show about the sharp rise in bond yields in the US. In the past week, yields on 30-year bonds have hit 5.66%.
我是莎拉·霍尔德,这是来自彭博新闻的《重大见解》。今天节目中,我与海军联邦信用合作社的首席经济学家约翰和海瑟·朗坐在一起,讨论债券收益率为何上升,世界各地的中央银行可能如何回应,以及美国消费者感受到的压力。所以,我们在节目中一直在谈论美国债券收益率急剧上升的问题。在过去一周,30年期债券的收益率已达到5.66%。
There's that new record for the 10-year. It's at its highest yield since 2002. Heather, what does this all tell you about where we are at in the US right now? To me the most interesting question right now is this debate around are these yields rising in the US at least due to a stronger economy. You know we have gotten a lot of interesting data in the last month that points to a healthier consumer than maybe many expected healthier job market than maybe many expected.
10年期国债创下了新的纪录。其收益率自2002年以来最高。海瑟,这一切告诉你目前美国的情况如何?对我来说,现在最有趣的问题是围绕这些收益率上涨的辩论:至少是因为美国经济更强了吗?你知道,我们在过去一个月收到了很多有趣的数据,表明消费者状况比许多人预期的更健康,就业市场也比许多人预期的更健康。
So I think that debate we have had some fresh data on and is is one of the most interesting right now. That's a more positive story. So and obviously the White House has fully embraced that story, but you hear a lot of smart voices making that case versus, you know, I lean more on the side. What this is really telling us is a belief in the market that taming inflation is going to be a much harder task. It's going to take longer than we thought.
所以我认为这场辩论我们已经有一些最新数据了,而且是目前最有趣的之一。这是一个更积极的故事。所以显然白宫完全接受了这个故事,但你听到很多明智的声音支持这一观点,而我则倾向于另一面。这真正告诉我们的是市场对控制通胀将是一项更加艰巨任务的信念。这将比我们想象的花费更长时间。
And that's both in the short-term context of what Fed chair Kevin Worsh can do and in the longer term context of the demographics and the fiscal situation of the US and many other countries. So I lean more on that more negative spin, but I think it's a really interesting debate.
这既涉及短期背景下美联储主席凯文·沃什能做什么,也涉及长期背景下美国和许多其他国家的人口结构和财政状况。所以我更倾向于这种更负面的解读,但我认为这是一个非常有趣的辩论。
And when it comes to these global markets, again, we're seeing France, UK, Japan seeing high yields as well. How much of that is it caused by the US or set off by what's going on in the US bond market and how much of it is related to sort of domestic factors in these countries?
当涉及到这些全球市场时,再次看到法国、英国和日本也出现了高收益率。这在多大程度上是由美国引起的或由美国债券市场的动向引发的,又在多大程度上与这些国家的国内因素有关?
Um both naturally the way to look at this is like a spark to light a flame. So you don't create a crisis from nothing if a country has its house completely in order. But similarly, if the markets are complacent and allow you to uh carry on, you can have the conditions for a crisis for quite a long time without being called on it. Japan, you know, has been an exception to every rule for a very long time, but if you have rates at 10ear yields were zero for many years because the Bank of Japan literally wouldn't let them rise beyond that.
嗯,从自然的角度来看,处理这种情况的方式就像用火花点燃火焰。因此,如果一个国家的内部状况完全良好,你就不会凭空制造危机。但同样地,如果市场自满并允许你继续下去,那么即使长期不被追究,也可能积累出危机的条件。日本长期以来一直是各种规则的例外,多年来其十年期收益率一直为零,因为日本央行 literally(字面上)不允许其上升超过那个水平。
They're now at three%. That's very serious. I think in Japan there is the possibility you could just try to close their deficit by selling a lot of public assets. Again, much like Margaret Thatcher did back home in Britain, there might be some relatively easy way out of that problem. But if you look at what is happening to the yields on French bonds compared to particularly neighboring German bonds, bearing in mind these two countries have the same currency, the same central bank, and they're supposed to be in a kind of a union that will merge their economies ever more.
现在它们已升至3%。这非常严重。我认为在日本,有可能通过出售大量公共资产来直接弥补赤字。再次强调,这与玛格丽特·撒切尔当年在英国本土的做法非常相似,或许存在某种相对简单的解决之道。但是,如果你看法国债券的收益率与邻国德国债券的收益率相比如何变化,请记住这两个国家使用相同的货币、拥有相同的中央银行,并且理论上处于一种将经济日益融合的联盟之中。
The market is plainly saying that it now sees French bonds as being far riskier.
市场显然在表明,它现在认为法国债券的风险要高得多。
Right? The gap between French bonds and German bonds is the widest it's been since the sovereign debt crisis back in 2011.
对吧?法国债券与德国债券之间的利差是自2011年主权债务危机以来最大的。
Very nearly close to there. Very nearly close to taking that out.
非常接近那个水平。非常接近消除该差距。
Why is that so significant?
为什么这如此重要?
If you have that wide a gap between two countries are in the Euro zone, that means you don't really believe that the Euro zone can hold it together. You're saying as an investor placing your money that way that you think there is a real risk that the Euro zone itself will fall apart. Mhm.
如果欧元区两个国家之间存在如此巨大的利差,这意味着你并不真正相信欧元区能够维持团结。你作为投资者将资金投入其中,是在表达你认为欧元区本身面临解体的真实风险。嗯哼。
If you have that big a gap between the borrowing costs in the two big European economies, you then get into a spiral effect. France at the moment wants to borrow more than ever before next year, which is an election year which they start with a deficit of 5%. The cost of that borrowing is increasing all the time because of this this run. And that looks very much as though it could spark the final crisis.
如果两大欧洲经济体之间的借贷成本存在如此大的差距,随后就会产生螺旋式效应。法国目前希望比以往任何时候都借入更多资金,明年是选举年,他们以5%的赤字起步。由于这种趋势,借贷成本一直在增加。这看起来极有可能引发最终的危机。
Yeah. I mean, to me, this is where the politics is starting to change. The political outlook is starting to change and the market is reacting to this in certain countries around the world. John's just been talking about France. I think you can make the same argument in the United States. You know, what's changed even in the last few weeks. Obviously, we're still in a never- ending war in Iran, and we're gonna run a worse fiscal deficit this year than we even expected, despite this strong economy supposedly have.
是的。我的意思是,在我看来,政治格局开始发生变化。政治前景正在改变,全球某些国家的市场对此做出了反应。约翰刚才提到了法国。我认为在美国也可以提出同样的论点。要知道,甚至在过去的几周里情况都发生了变化。显然,我们仍然深陷与伊朗的无休止战争中,而且尽管经济看似强劲,今年的财政赤字仍将比我们预期的更糟。
Preliminary estimates put it at 2 trillion for 2026.
初步估计2026年的赤字将达到2万亿美元。
That's right. You know, and and back in 2019, a more comparable economic year, we were running a $1 trillion deficit. So, you know, you can see uh just how egregious it looks. And on top of that, populism is sweeping. It's starting to sweep the United States. you know, already some early sides of it, but seeing uh the Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El Say, you know, surge to victory there among other types of elections of populist candidates is a wake-up call to the bond market that there is just no fiscal restraint.
没错。你知道,在2019年这个更具可比性的经济年份,我们的赤字是1万亿美元。所以你可以看出这看起来多么严重。此外,民粹主义正在蔓延,它开始席卷美国。你知道,已经有一些早期的迹象,但看到密歇根州参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德(Abdul El Say)在其他民粹主义候选人的选举中崛起并获胜,这对债券市场来说是一个警钟,表明根本没有任何财政约束。
This is totally off the table and any signs, you know, for a while it was we're going to use the tariff revenue in the United States to help pay down the debt. And even though that was peanuts, at least somebody was talking about paying down the deficit. Now we have a President Trump who's out saying, "I'm going to send everybody a $5,000 check if Republicans win." And oh, how about a $90 check for people on Medicare?
这完全不在考虑范围内。有一段时间的迹象是,我们将利用美国的关税收入来帮助偿还债务。尽管那只是九牛一毛,但至少有人在谈论削减赤字。现在我们有一位特朗普总统公开表示:‘如果共和党人获胜,我将给每个人寄一张5000美元的支票。’还有,给医疗保险受益者发90美元支票怎么样?
And so that's where I think I differ a little bit from John. I do think the politics has started to clash with that ongoing reality of the fiscal situation.
因此,我认为我与约翰的观点略有不同。我确实认为政治已经开始与财政状况的持续现实发生冲突。
And Heather, you're tracking a lot of economic indicators here in the US. Jobs, inflation, consumer confidence. We've gotten a lot of data drops in the past week or so that have given us a fuller picture. When you look at this data in aggregate, how high do you think US bond yields might climb?
海瑟,你一直在追踪美国的许多经济指标,包括就业、通胀和消费者信心。在过去一周左右的时间里,我们收到了大量数据发布,为我们提供了更全面的图景。当你综合看待这些数据时,你认为美国债券收益率可能会攀升到多高?
Yeah, that's the trillion dollar question right there. It's hard to predict. I'll tell you what, the way I look at it, I get worried if we get past 5.5. It's not that we've never seen it before. It's not, you know, that it can't it could totally crash at 5.55
是的,这正是那个价值万亿的问题。很难预测。告诉你吧,我的看法是,如果超过5.5%,我会感到担忧。这并不是说我们以前从未见过这种情况。也不是说它不可能在5.5%到5.55%之间彻底崩溃。
on the 10 year.
指的是10年期国债收益率。
On the 10-year. Yeah, I'm specifically speaking on the 10-year. But as John was saying earlier, this is a rapid repricing. There is a lot of both corporate debt that needs to be renegotiated and redone in the coming years. And to do it at such a higher rate than expected is going to trigger some bankruptcies and trigger some disruption. At the same time, you know, obviously at Navy Federal Credit Union, we are monitoring every day the consumer side, you know, mortgage rate, it's above seven, let alone 7.5% the 30-year mortgage.
针对10年期。是的,我特指10年期。但正如约翰之前所说,这是一次快速重新定价。未来几年有大量企业债务需要重新谈判和重组。以远高于预期的利率进行这些操作将引发一些破产并带来一些动荡。同时,众所周知,在海军联邦信用合作社(Navy Federal Credit Union),我们每天都在监控消费者端的情况,你知道的,抵押贷款利率已超过7%,更不用说30年期抵押贷款超过7.5%了。
It's like being in Antarctica. You know, it's totally frozen. The phone stops ringing. Uh you can see the national data going down. And I worry too that a lot of people personal loans have been going up this year and that has been the lifesaver for a lot of the bottom third of America. and that is no longer accept very accessible to people at these types of rates. So there's just so much strain on the economy. Same thing in the banking sector.
这就像身处南极洲。你知道的,一切都冻结了。电话不再响起。你可以看到全国数据正在下滑。我也担心今年许多人的个人贷款一直在增加,而这一直是美国底层三分之一人口的生命线。而现在,以这种类型的利率,人们很难再获得这类贷款。因此经济承受着巨大的压力。银行业也是如此。
You know, there's a reason the banking sector had a pretty bad September in the stock market. It's because banks are sitting on a ton o
你知道,银行业在股市上经历了相当糟糕的九月是有原因的。因为银行手头堆积了大量未兑现的
原文超出正文长度上限,此处截断——上游还有内容,完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力