美国最高法院否决特朗普政府邮件选票监管计划

CENTER'S MAIN BUILDING HAS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. BACK TO CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. BACK TO YOU. YOU.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WITH

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WITH THE MIMIDTERMS FAST APPROACHING, THE MIDTERMS FAST APPROACHING, THE SUPREMEME COURT IS PUSHING THE SUPREME COURT IS PUSHING BACK AGAINST ATTEMPTS BY THE BACK AGAINST ATTEMPTS BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO TRY TO TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO TRY TO CHANGE ELECTION RULES. IN THE CHANGE ELECTION RULES. IN THE LAST WEEK, THE COURT HANDED LAST WEEK, THE COURT HANDED PRESIDENT TRUMP DEFEATS ON TWO PRESIDENT TRUMP DEFEATS ON TWO KEY ISSUES.

ON MONDAY, JUSTICES KEY ISSUES. ON MONDAY, JUSTICES BLOCKED THE PRESIDENT'S PLAN TO BLOCKED THE PRESIDENT'S PLAN TO TRY AND EXERT FEDERAL L CONTROL TRY AND EXERT FEDERAL CONTROL OVER MAIL IN BALLOTS BY OVER MAIL IN BALLOTS BY IMPLEMENTING POSTAL SERVICE IMPLEMENTING POSTAL SERVICE REGULATION. AND LAST WEEK, THE REGULATION. AND LAST WEEK, THE COURT TWICE RULED AGAGAINST COURT TWICE RULED AGAINST REPUBLICANS BY DECLINING TO REPUBLICANS BY DECLINING TO REVIVE A NEW CONGRESSIONAL MAP REVIVE A NEW CONGRESSIONAL MAP IN MISSOURI.

THAT MAP WOULD IN MISSOURI. THAT MAP WOULD HAVE ELIMINATED ONE OF TWO HAVE ELIMINATED ONE OF TWO DISTRICTS HELD BY DEMOCRATS. DISTRICTS HELD BY DEMOCRATS. NBC NEWS SENIOR SUPREME COURT NBC NEWS SENIOR SUPREME COURT REPORTER LAWRENCE HURLRLEY JOINS REPORTER LAWRENCE HURLEY JOINS US NOW TO O DISCUSS THIS. US NOW TO DISCUSS THIS. LAWRENCE. I MEAN, GIVEVEN A SIX LAWRENCE. I MEAN, GIVEN A SIX THREE CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY, WE THREE CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY, WE KNOW THE COURT HAS OFTEN RULED KNOW THE COURT HAS OFTEN RULED IN FAVOR OF SOME OF THE IN FAVOR OF SOME OF THE PRESIDENT'S PRIORITIES.

YOU'VE PRESIDENT'S PRIORITIES. YOU'VE SPOKEN WITH SOMEME ELECTION LAW SPOKEN WITH SOME ELECTION LAW EXPERTS ABOUT THESESE DECISIONS. EXPERTS ABOUT THESE DECISIONS. FIRST OFF, HOW ARE THEHEY FIRST OFF, HOW ARE THEY INTERPRETING THE MAIL IN BALLOT INTERPRETING THE MAIL IN BALLOT RULING THAT WE SAW THIS WEEK? RULING THAT WE SAW THIS WEEK?

THAT'S RIGHT. SO THE MAIL IN

THAT'S RIGHT. SO THE MAIL IN BALLOT RULING, I THINK IT WAS A BALLOT RULING, I THINK IT WAS A CASE OF A SIGH OF RELIEF, I CASE OF A SIGH OF RELIEF, I THINK, FROM A LOT OF ELECTION THINK, FROM A LOT OF ELECTION LAW EXPERTS AS WELL AS ELECTION LAW EXPERTS AS WELL AS ELECTION ADMINISTRATORS, BECAUSE IF THIS ADMINISTRATORS, BECAUSE IF THIS REGULATION HAD GONE INTO EFFECT, REGULATION HAD GONE INTO EFFECT, THAT WOULD EXERT FEDERAL THAT WOULD EXERT FEDERAL CONTROL FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER CONTROL FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER OVER MAIL IN BALLOTS, OVER MAIL IN BALLOTS, POTENTIALLY LEAD TO PEOPLE NOT POTENTIALLY LEAD TO PEOPLE NOT BEING ABLE TO VOTE, ITIT WOULD BEING ABLE TO VOTE, IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED A LOT OF CHAOS IN HAVE CAUSED A LOT OF CHAOS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTIONS THE ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTIONS HEADING INTO THE MIDTERMS.

THAT HEADING INTO THE MIDTERMS. THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT, YOU KNOW, WAS SOMETHING