美国就业数据强劲,9月加息概率回升至60%
Labor Market Remains Hot
Hey everyone and thanks for jumping back into the macroverse. Today we're going to talk about the most recent jobs report as it came in really hot. If you guys like the content, make sure you subscribe to the channel, give the video a thumbs up, and also check out the sale on into the cryptoverse premium at into the cryptoverse.com. As a reminder, the ITC conference is coming up in late November, so make sure to get your ticket.
大家好,欢迎回到宏观世界频道。今天我们要聊聊最新发布的就业报告,数据表现非常强劲。如果你喜欢我们的内容,请记得订阅频道、给视频点赞,并查看 into the cryptoverse.com 上的 Into the Cryptoverse Premium 促销活动。提醒大家,ITC 会议将于 11 月下旬举行,请务必提前购票。
Let's go ahead and jump in. So we actually had a relatively hot jobs report today and in in a sense yesterday we had one of the members of the Federal Reserve uh Waller he came out and said that he was more so leaning in the direction of holding rates constant. Now, when he did that, the market expectations of a rate hike in September dropped from 66% or so down to around 50%. So, yesterday, the market was then less clear if we were in fact going to get a rate hike and was starting to lean more towards it's a coin flip.
让我们直接进入正题。今天我们确实收到了一份相对强劲的就业报告。而在某种程度上,昨天美联储理事沃勒(Waller)发表讲话,表示他更倾向于维持利率不变。当他做出这一表态后,市场对于 9 月加息的预期从约 66% 降至 50% 左右。因此,昨天的市场对于是否真的会加息变得不那么明确,并开始倾向于认为这就像抛硬币一样五五开。
But with the recent jobs report today, the it kind of undid to some extent what Waller was saying yesterday, right? So we're now right back up to 60%. Not quite as high, right? It's not at like 66 67%. It's not 2/3 1/3, but 60% chance of a rate hike. I was curious, you know, and and I I was thinking about this when you look at at just current probabilities for for a rate hike and and and think about it as yesterday when it was 5050, but I was wondering like, you know, has there really been many times in history where we're only two weeks away from the next Fed meeting and the odds are are are like this, like approximately 50/50.
但随着今天最新的就业报告出炉,这在一定程度上抵消了沃勒昨天言论的影响,对吧?所以目前市场对 9 月加息的预期又回到了 60%。虽然不像之前那么高,比如不是 66% 或 67%,也不是三分之二对三分之一的比例,但加息概率为 60%。我很好奇,当我看着当前的加息概率,并回想昨天还是 50/50 的局面时,我不禁在想:历史上真的有过很多次,在下次美联储会议仅剩两周时, odds 还像这样接近 50/50 的情况吗?
Because from my memory, and I'm not saying it hasn't happened before, but just as I'm sort of thinking about it right now, from my memory, normally when you're within one or two weeks of the meeting, the market like the the market expectations of what's actually going to happen tends to be closer to like 80 to 90%. So, I I think what it essentially does is it it almost makes the stakes higher in every single data point that happens because there's just a lot of uncertainty, right?
因为根据我的记忆,我不是说以前没发生过,只是我现在这么一想,通常当距离会议只有一两周时,市场对于实际发生什么的预期往往更接近 80% 到 90%。所以我认为,这实际上提高了每一个后续数据点的权重,因为存在很大的不确定性,对吧?
And of course, markets generally are not a huge fan of uncertainty. And so when you do get these slight changes, it can then have more adverse effects on on markets and and so we'll see what the Fed does. My guess is if they don't raise rates, you'll just see the long end of the yield curve continue to go higher. So, I know they keep fighting the long end of the yield curve. Uh, and of course, Bessant with the uh, you know, the the Treasury the the bond buybacks, but one of the most effective ways to combat the long end of the yield curve would just be to raise rates.
当然,市场通常对不确定性并不买账。因此,当出现这些细微变化时,可能会对市场的负面影响更大,所以我们将看看美联储会怎么做。我的猜测是,如果他们不加息,你将看到收益率曲线的长端继续走高。我知道他们一直在与收益率曲线的长端作斗争。嗯,当然还有贝桑特(Bessant)提到的财政部债券回购计划,但对抗收益率曲线长端最有效的方法之一就是加息。
But that's also like the one thing that the current administration really has no interest in in them doing. So, we'll see what happens. I mean the Fed again is theoretically an independent body and they do not you know need to sort of oblige the current administration but we will in fact see I I think what we what we have seen what we have seen is a um a transition from a Fed with Powell where there were there were not a whole lot of dissenting voices.
但这恰恰是当前政府最不愿意看到的情况。所以,我们拭目以待吧。我是说,美联储在理论上是一个独立机构,他们不需要去迎合当前的政府,但实际上我们会看到——我认为我们所看到的是一种转变:从鲍威尔领导下的美联储时期,当时持反对意见的声音并不多。
Right? I I think that the Fed chair was able to do a good job of kind of getting everyone on the same page. But if you look at the last Fed meeting, there were three dissents, right? Three people wanted to raise rates. And so I I think it it's almost becoming this more of an independent thing, right? Rather than getting everyone on the same page, there's a lot more dissense. And I I think we'll probably continue to see that as as time goes on.
对吧?我认为美联储主席能够很好地让所有人达成共识。但如果你看最近一次美联储会议,有三票反对,对吧?三个人希望加息。所以我认为这变得越来越像是一个独立的行为,而不是让所有人达成共识,现在存在更多的分歧。而且我认为随着时间的推移,我们可能会继续看到这种情况。
So let's dive into what actually caused the odds of the rate hike to go back up to 60%. So, first of all, you have the unemployment rate and and it's now back at it's still at 4.1%. So, again, the labor market is historically fine. Again, with it being low, that's not in and of itself a declaration that things can't get worse at some point, as nonlinear accelerations and the unemployment rate often start from low levels.
那么让我们深入探讨到底是什么导致加息的概率回升至60%。首先,失业率数据再次回到4.1%。所以,劳动力市场在历史上一直表现良好。同样,尽管失业率处于低位,但这本身并不意味着情况不会在某一点恶化,因为非线性加速和失业率往往都是从低位开始的。
But again, who knows how many months or even years away we are from that. So in the short term, the market is far more concerned about inflation than it is a a recession caused by a weak labor market. And it's not just the unemployment rate, right? Because the unemployment rate has been coming down and while and since November of 2025. And while the unemployment rate has been going down, the um you know, other things have have also gone down.
但同样,谁知道距离那种情况还有几个月甚至几年呢?所以在短期内,市场更担心的是通胀,而不是由疲软的劳动力市场引起的衰退。而且不仅仅是失业率的问题,对吧?因为自2025年11月以来,失业率一直在下降。而在失业率下降的同时,其他一些指标也在下降。
And one of the things that, you know, we've we've talked about some is the non-farm payroll. So if you look at at the employment level and and look at non-farm payroll last month, it was actually negative, but in the recent report, it was revised back to being positive. So again, it's it's interesting that markets react so much on the news of of you know, these data points that come in when the next month it all just gets revised.
其中一点,也就是我们之前讨论过的,是非农就业数据。所以如果你看就业水平以及上个月的非农就业人数,实际上是负值,但在最近的报告中,该数据被修正为正值。因此有趣的是,市场对这类数据点发布时的反应如此剧烈,而到了下个月,这些数据往往都会被重新修订。
Anyways, but what this shows you is that the the labor market isn't quite as bad, right? If you take the year-over-year change, you can see that when it goes negative, that is where recessions occur, right? When this chart goes negative, and we came really close back in late 2025 and early 2026, but didn't happen, right? And now it's starting to accelerate again off of the lows. So, the lowest it got was back in in December of 2025.
总之,这表明劳动力市场并没有那么糟糕,对吧?如果看同比变化,你可以看到当它转为负值时,衰退就会发生,对吧?当这张图表显示负值时,我们在2025年底和2026年初曾非常接近这一情况,但并未发生,对吧?而现在它正从低点开始再次加速上升。最低点出现在2025年12月。
The year-over-year non total non-farm payroll difference was 116,000. We're back up to 600. We're back up to 603,000. So, the labor market is actually showing signs of being resilient. It is right. And again, that's just what's happening, right? I mean, you can pretty clearly see it that the labor market has been improving and and this report confirms it. So, one of the things that Waller did say was he he said that that while he's leaning more towards holding rates constant, it wouldn't take him it wouldn't take much for him to be in the other camp, right, of of a rate hike.
非农就业总数同比差异为11.6万。我们已回升至60万,具体为60.3万。因此,劳动力市场实际上显示出韧性。确实如此。而这正是正在发生的事情,对吧?也就是说,你可以清楚地看到劳动力市场一直在改善,这份报告证实了这一点。沃勒(Waller)提到的一点是,他表示虽然自己更倾向于维持利率不变,但要让他转向加息阵营,并不需要太多条件,对吧?
And and so, one of the things you could look at is average hourly earnings. That one has also just continued to climb. Now, when you look at it from a year-over-year perspective, it's been dropping. So, it's moving in the direction of where they wanted to go. The question is is it moving fast enough? And as it stands right now, the market clearly doesn't think so. Now, we're going to have the next Fed meeting on September 16th.
你可以关注的一个指标是平均小时工资。该指标也持续攀升。现在,从同比角度来看,它一直在下降。因此,它正朝着他们希望的方向发展。问题是:它的下降速度够快吗?就目前而言,市场显然认为不够快。接下来我们将在9月16日举行下一次美联储会议。
All right. There's also going to be a Bank of Japan meeting around that time. I would expect the Bank of Japan to raise rates. Okay. So they're they're very very likely going to raise rates. In fact, the Bank of Japan might end up raising twice potentially before the end of the year. If you were to go look at interest rates over in Japan, they're currently 1%. But if you look at the 2-year yield in Japan, and let's actually go ahead and add this to the same axis as as the other one.
好的。届时日本银行也将举行会议。我预计日本银行会加息。好吧。所以他们极有可能加息。事实上,日本银行年底前可能会两次加息。如果你去查看日本的利率,目前为1%。但如果看看日本的两年期收益率,让我们实际将其添加到与上述相同的坐标轴上。
What you'll notice is that the 2-year yield is all the way up at 1.74%. And there's an argument to be made that, you know, the 2-year yield is essentially showing the Bank of Japan where interest rates need to be. So, I would argue you're likely going to have a rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September. And there's a good chance you might have another one before the end of the year, potentially around the December time frame and maybe sooner, but I I would say, you know, September, December can make could make a lot of sense to get two more rate hikes from the Bank of Japan.
你会注意到,2年期收益率已经升至1.74%。有一种观点认为,2年期收益率实际上反映了日本央行认为利率应该处于的水平。因此,我认为日本央行很可能在9月加息。而且年底前可能还会再加息一次,时间可能在12月左右,甚至更早。但我会说,9月和12月这两个时间点让日本央行再加息两次是非常合理的。
That would then get rates up to about 1.5%. So that's the direction I think the the Bank of Japan is going. Now, for the Fed, I think they likely will raise once. I'm not as sure about the second time. Okay. you know, one time might be enough and and it's going to depend on a lot of things. You know, one of the reasons why I expect inflation to remain sticky here in the short term is if you look at at I mean again, I'm not a geopolitical expert.
这将使利率升至约1.5%。这就是我认为日本央行的方向。至于美联储,我认为他们很可能会加息一次。我对第二次加息不太确定。好吧,你知道的,加一次息可能就足够了,这取决于许多因素。你知道,我预期通胀在短期内保持顽固的原因之一是,如果你看看我的意思是,再说一遍,我不是地缘政治专家。
I am not claiming to be one, but I don't have to be a geopolitical expert to just look at the price of oil, right? And and the price of oil i
我并不声称自己是地缘政治专家,但我无需成为地缘政治专家就能观察油价,对吧?而油价的
原文超出正文长度上限,此处截断——上游还有内容,完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力