黄仁勋被罢免,Colette Crest出任英伟达临时CEO
Jensen Huang's Exit Kicks Off Nvidia Strategy Reset | Bloomberg Businessweek
英伟达最高管理层突发变动,直接影响公司治理与未来战略走向,是市场高度关注的重磅事件。建议投资者密切关注董事会后续遴选进展及对公司AI业务连续性的潜在影响。
[music] Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts, radio news.
[音乐] 彭博音频工作室播客、广播新闻。
You're listening to Bloomberg [music] Business Week with Carol Masser and Tim Stenc on Bloomberg Radio. Staying on Nvidia, the company's longtime CEO Jensen Huang has been ousted. EVP and CFO Colette Crest has been named interim CEO. Nvidia's board in a statement today said she will continue to serve in those roles, quote, until a permanent successor has been named. The board initiating a search for a permanent CEO and will consider internal and external candidates.
您正在收听彭博[音乐]《商业周刊》,由卡罗尔·马瑟和蒂姆·斯滕克在彭博电台播出。继续聚焦英伟达,该公司长期首席执行官黄仁勋已被罢免。执行副总裁兼首席财务官科莱特·克雷斯特被任命为临时首席执行官。英伟达董事会在今天的一份声明中表示,她将“继续担任这些职务,直到指定永久继任者”。董事会将启动寻找永久首席执行官的搜索,并将考虑内部和外部候选人。
They will indeed. For more on how to make sure a CEO transition is successful, we're joined by Andy West. He's senior partner and global co-leader of strategy and corporate finance over at Mckenzian Company. Also the author of the forthcoming book, Strategy and Value, the four foundations that drive long-term performance. It is out next week. Lucky for us though, we've got an advanced copy, so we want to get into it.
他们确实会。为了进一步了解如何确保首席执行官过渡成功,我们请到了安迪·韦斯特。他是麦肯锡公司的资深合伙人及全球战略与企业金融联合负责人。他也是即将出版的书籍《战略与价值:驱动长期绩效的四大基石》的作者,该书将于下周出版。不过对我们来说幸运的是,我们已经拿到了提前版,所以我们想深入探讨一下。
Um Andy, of course, joining us on this Thursday, joining us from Boston. Andy, good to have you here on Bloomberg. Uh we got to ask you about the Nvidia story. It's nothing. It's everything. As one of our colleagues said, my wife who doesn't even talk about what I do, doesn't necessarily care about business news, is like, "Hey, what's up with this dude? Like, you think he's going to be like out or like what's his future?"
嗯,安迪,当然,今天周四与我们连线,来自波士顿。安迪,很高兴你来到彭博。呃,我们必须向你请教英伟达的故事。这既不是小事,也不是大事。正如我们的一位同事所说,我妻子甚至不谈论我的工作,对商业新闻也不一定感兴趣,但她却说:“嘿,这家伙怎么回事?你觉得他会出局吗?或者他的未来会怎样?”
Uh he is out. Nvidia, can they pull it off? Shareholders not so confident about a Jensen less Nvidia. So what's on their plate from your perspective?
呃,他确实出局了。英伟达能成功应对吗?股东们对没有黄仁勋的英伟达信心不足。那么从你的角度来看,他们面临哪些挑战?
Well, I mean I would frame the the entire discussion around just CEO transition in general. I mean any CEO transition has a big impact on an organization. In our book, we talk about the unelegatable roles of the CEO and strategy. I mean they set the vision, they set the tempo, they mobilize the organization. founders especially. So you know indie change especially an unplanned one can have a a destabilizing effect.
嗯,我的意思是,我会将整个讨论框架围绕一般意义上的首席执行官过渡来展开。任何首席执行官过渡都会对组织产生重大影响。在我们的书中,我们讨论了首席执行官和战略中那些难以言喻的角色。我的意思是,他们设定愿景,设定节奏,动员组织。尤其是创始人。所以你知道,特别是非计划内的变动,可能会产生破坏性影响。
What about a change where you know a culture is created by an executive uh the executive then has some very public missteps in his personal life and perhaps to some employees like the person they thought they knew didn't end up being the person that they knew. Does what does that do something to a company?
如果一种文化是由一位高管创建的,然后这位高管在个人生活中出现了一些非常公开的失误,也许对某些员工来说,他们以为认识的那个人最终并不是他们所了解的那个人。这种情况会对公司产生什么影响呢?
Well, you know, the short answer is of course. I mean, but the key for any of these transitions is to focus on the role you need going forward versus trying to recreate the past. So, you know, you're never going to be able to and nor do you need to create the journey that you've been on. And so, you need to find somebody who can take the strategy forward, which is why strategy is so important in these times of change.
嗯,你知道,简短的回答当然是。我的意思是,但这些转型的关键在于关注你未来需要扮演的角色,而不是试图重现过去。所以,你知道的,你永远无法也不必要重现你所走过的旅程。因此,你需要找到能够推动战略前进的人,这就是为什么在这些变革时期战略如此重要。
You also need to focus on the organization. I'm glad you're talking about it because I think it is really quite important to quiet the organization. For a mature company that's wellperforming, you know, very few leadership changes in general require immediate or fundamental change in strategy. So if your market has changed, if your ability to compete has changed as a result, of course, you need to be quite precise in thinking about things.
你还需要关注组织。我很高兴你在谈论这一点,因为我认为让组织安静下来确实非常重要。对于一家表现良好的成熟公司来说,通常很少有领导层的变更需要立即或根本性的战略调整。所以如果你的市场发生了变化,或者你的竞争能力因此发生了变化,当然,你需要在思考问题时非常精准。
But in in most of these cases, the immediate answer is no. So you know, the board's got to figure out what they're going to do about a transition. But most people should just get back to business and let the transition play itself.
但在大多数情况下, immediate answer is no(直接答案是否定的)。所以你知道,董事会必须弄清楚他们打算如何处理过渡问题。但大多数人应该只是回归业务,让过渡自然发生。
You know, one thing I want to ask you, so the book is Strategy and Value, the four foundations that drive long-term performance. Uh, safe to say that Jensen Wong um created a lot of performance at his company. Uh, also a lot of um investor wealth in terms of the returns in that share price. your team sharing with us that according to research from McKenzie fewer than one in five executives now believe in the quality of their strategy a share that has fallen roughly 40% since 2011 even as the value of great strategy has been rising AI is part of that problem I am curious when you are a CEO so identified with a narrative a trend um when you think about AI and the build and the boom we think about Jensen Wong and they have the numbers to show it in certainly at their company.
你知道吗,我想问你一件事,这本书是《战略与价值》,驱动长期表现的四大基础。可以说,Jensen Wong 在他的公司创造了大量的业绩。从股价回报的角度来看,也为投资者创造了大量财富。你的团队与我们分享说,根据麦肯锡的研究,如今不到五分之一的执行官相信其战略的质量,这一比例自2011年以来下降了约40%,尽管优秀战略的价值一直在上升。AI是这个问题的一部分,我很好奇当你作为CEO时,你对一个叙事、一个趋势如此认同,比如当我们想到AI以及构建和繁荣时,我们会想到Jensen Wong,并且他们有数据来证明这一点,至少在他们公司是如此。
But I do think about
但我确实会想到
CEO when they're so involved with one strategy.
当CEO如此卷入单一战略时。
Yeah.
是的。
If something starts to change and they see that how hard it is to back off from it.
如果事情开始发生变化,他们会看到退出的难度有多大。
I'm just kind of playing around here. I have no nothing to base this on, but I'm just saying. I just wonder how
我只是在这里随便说说。我没有依据,但我只是这么说。我只是想知道如何
Yeah, there's there's a lot packed in there. So, let me talk about the first thing that you mentioned. I think one we are very much in a strategy moment across the world right now. Every every executive is thinking about strategy. If you just look at something as simple as Google search on what is strategy, it's up 14x right from its 10-year average. So people are asking the question and as you mentioned the value of strategy is more relevant than ever, but the quality of strategy has gone down.
是的,里面包含了很多内容。那么,让我谈谈你提到的第一件事。我认为,目前全球正处于一个战略时刻。每位高管都在思考战略。如果你只看一个简单的例子,比如在 Google 搜索“什么是战略”,其热度比十年平均水平高出 14 倍。因此,人们正在提出这个问题,正如你所提到的,战略的价值比以往任何时候都更加相关,但战略的质量却下降了。
So we're in this strategy moment and yet you know people are not getting what they need out of strategy. Now the problem when you look at it and I think what's affecting everyone everywhere and AI is a big part of that is mobilization. So executives in a lot of ways are addicted to complexity. They're addicted to nuance. You know uncertainty is at an all-time high. When you look at the world uncertainty index that the economist puts out it's four standard deviations above the mean.
所以我们正处于这样一个战略时刻,然而你知道,人们并没有从战略中获得他们所需的东西。现在,当你审视这个问题时,我认为影响各地每个人的因素是动员(mobilization),而 AI 是其中很大一部分。在很多方面,高管们对复杂性上瘾,对细微差别上瘾。你知道,不确定性处于历史最高水平。当你查看《经济学人》发布的全球不确定性指数时,它比均值高出四个标准差。
And AI is playing a rich role in that. I mean it's creating tremendous opportunity but it's creating a lot of questions. So you know the issue is mobilization. And most organizations are frozen and they need to find a way to actually take advantage of this moment and you know create better strategy and actually get strategy done.
AI 在其中扮演了丰富的角色。我的意思是,它创造了巨大的机会,但也带来了许多问题。所以你知道,问题在于动员。大多数组织处于冻结状态,他们需要找到一种方法来真正利用这一时刻,并制定更好的战略,真正落实战略。
Well, what what causes a like what what are some examples of companies in your view that are not frozen?
那么,导致这种情况的原因是什么?在你看来,有哪些公司没有处于冻结状态的例子?
Well, I mean I think you'd have to look at companies that are able to actually materially move resources from one place to another to take advantage of the moment. So in the book we talk about the four foundations and I think organizations that are close to these foundations are able to actually have a shared reality about what's happening. They're able to debate their strategy and they're able to act. So things like recognizing a discontinuity in your market and being able to move resources towards that, moving quickly, thinking about sources of competitive advantage and actually am I you know taking advantage of what makes me particularly unique and not just strengths and you know most importantly reallocating resources and you know organizations have a really hard time doing that.
嗯,我的意思是,我认为你必须看看那些能够实际将资源从一个地方大规模转移到另一个地方以利用这一时刻的公司。所以在书中,我们讨论了四大基础,我认为接近这些基础的组织能够就正在发生的事情形成共同认知。他们能够辩论他们的战略,并且能够采取行动。例如,认识到市场中的不连续性,并能够将资源向此移动,快速行动,思考竞争优势的来源,以及实际上,你知道,利用使我特别独特的因素,而不仅仅是优势,最重要的是重新配置资源,而 organizations 在这件事上真的很难做到。
I think in a lot of ways the machine that allocates strategy or that connects strategy and value is not working as well as it should in kind of times of high uncertainty.
我认为,在很多方面,分配战略或将战略与价值连接起来的机制在高不确定性的时期并没有像应该的那样良好运作。
Okay. do I do want to go back to the the Nvidia story because this is something that that you know has been the story today. You you've got this this chapter in here about the CEO's unique role in in strategy and value. And if you when you do have a change at the top with somebody as fundamental to an organization as Jensen Wong at Nvidia uh and somebody who has been such an ambassador not just to uh the the investor class but also to the the general world of what he has called a transformative technology.
好的。我们要不要回到英伟达(Nvidia)的故事上来,因为这是今天的话题焦点。书中有一章专门探讨首席执行官在战略和价值创造中的独特作用。当像英伟达的黄仁勋(Jensen Wong)这样对组织具有根本性影响的高层发生变动时,他不仅作为投资者群体的代表,也作为他所称的“变革性技术”在全世界的代言人,这种情况下,公司的战略和价值难道不会发生变化吗?
How does that not change the strategy and value of a company?
这难道不会改变一家公司的战略和价值吗?
Well, think about what strategy and value actually is. I mean, I think the whole book is about deconstructing it and making it actually quite simple, right? Because this complexity is what's keeping people from mobilizing effectively. And if you think about, you know, the removal of any CEO from any organization, does that change the shape of the market? Does that change the applicability of their technology or whatever product that they they sell?
嗯,想想战略和价值实际上是什么。我认为整本书都在解构它,使其变得相当简单,对吧?因为正是这种复杂性阻碍了人们有效地采取行动。如果你思考一下,任何首席执行官从任何组织中离任,这会改变市场的格局吗?会改变他们技术的适用性或他们所销售的产品吗?
Does that change what makes the organization unique and special? And if the answer is yes, you need to look at that in a pret
这会改变使该组织独特和特别之处吗?如果答案是肯定的,你需要对此进行更深入的审视(pret...)
原文超出正文长度上限,此处截断——上游还有内容,完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力