跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选88Hacker News Best(web_list)模型发布/更新多源精选 ×8

Meta发布轻量模型Muse Ember,主打Agent工具调用与编码

Muse Ember: Our smallest, most efficient model

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

Meta发布全新轻量级模型Muse Ember,直接对标竞品旗舰小模型,提供极具竞争力的性价比与Agent专项能力数据,对优化Agent推理成本有重要参考价值。

Today, we're introducing Muse Ember, our smallest and most efficient model designed for complex reasoning execution and the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks, routing, extraction, and long document parsing.

今天,我们推出 Muse Ember,这是我们最小、最高效的模型,专为复杂推理执行以及代理全天重复的工作而设计:工具调用、编码子任务、路由、提取和长文档解析。

Muse Ember delivers more intelligence per dollar than Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna at any reasoning setting: it matches Haiku's best score at about a third of the cost and beats every Luna setting. It also sits on the efficiency frontier of the full Artificial Analysis leaderboard: no model scores higher for less per task.

在任何推理设置下,Muse Ember 每美元的智能产出均高于 Claude Haiku 5.5 或 GPT-6 Luna:它以约三分之一的成本达到 Haiku 的最高得分,并优于所有 Luna 设置。它还位于整个 Artificial Analysis 排行榜的效率前沿:没有模型能在每项任务成本更低的情况下获得更高的分数。

Intelligence vs. Cost Per Task

智能与每项任务的成本对比

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against cost per task at each reasoning effort, from the raw Artificial Analysis results. Muse Ember costs are estimates at proposed pricing.

基于原始 Artificial Analysis 结果,在不同推理努力程度下,Artificial Analysis 智能指数与每项任务成本的对比。Muse Ember 的成本是基于建议定价的估算值。

Intelligence vs. Cost Per Task$0.00$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40152025303540Cost Per Task (USD)Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexxhighmaxmediumhighxhighmaxhighxhighmaxMuse EmberClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna

智能与每项任务的成本对比$0.00$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40152025303540每项任务成本(美元)Artificial Analysis 智能指数xhighmaxmediumhighxhighmaxhighxhighmaxMuse EmberClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna

Intelligence vs. Cost Per Task$0.00$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40152025303540Cost Per Task (USD)Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexxhighmaxmediumhighxhighmaxhighxhighmaxMuse EmberClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna

智能与每项任务的成本对比$0.00$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40152025303540每项任务成本(美元)Artificial Analysis 智能指数xhighmaxmediumhighxhighmaxhighxhighmaxMuse EmberClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna

  • xhigh
  • max
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
  • Muse Ember
  • Claude Haiku 5.5
  • GPT-6 Luna
SeriesMeasurementValue
Muse EmberCost Per Task (USD)$0.116
Muse EmberScore33.9
Muse EmberCost Per Task (USD)$0.136
Muse EmberScore35.8
Claude Haiku 5.5Cost Per Task (USD)$0.092
Claude Haiku 5.5Score24.6
Claude Haiku 5.5Cost Per Task (USD)$0.159
Claude Haiku 5.5Score29.6
Claude Haiku 5.5Cost Per Task (USD)$0.248
Claude Haiku 5.5Score34.3
Claude Haiku 5.5Cost Per Task (USD)$0.411
Claude Haiku 5.5Score36.2
GPT-6 LunaCost Per Task (USD)$0.073
GPT-6 LunaScore21.4
GPT-6 LunaCost Per Task (USD)$0.104
GPT-6 LunaScore23.3
GPT-6 LunaCost Per Task (USD)$0.152
GPT-6 LunaScore27.8
系列测量指标数值
Muse Ember每项任务成本(美元)$0.116
Muse Ember得分33.9
Muse Ember每项任务成本(美元)$0.136
Muse Ember得分35.8
Claude Haiku 5.5每项任务成本(美元)$0.092
Claude Haiku 5.5得分24.6
Claude Haiku 5.5每项任务成本(美元)$0.159
Claude Haiku 5.5得分29.6
Claude Haiku 5.5每项任务成本(美元)$0.248
Claude Haiku 5.5得分34.3
Claude Haiku 5.5每项任务成本(美元)$0.411
Claude Haiku 5.5得分36.2
GPT-6 Luna每项任务成本(美元)$0.073
GPT-6 Luna得分21.4
GPT-6 Luna每项任务成本(美元)$0.104
GPT-6 Luna得分23.3
GPT-6 Luna每项任务成本(美元)$0.152
GPT-6 Luna得分27.8

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026. Each point is one reasoning-effort setting. Muse Ember cost at list pricing.

Artificial Analysis | 2026年11月9日。每个点代表一个推理努力设置。Muse Ember 成本按列表定价计算。

Muse Ember evaluation results

Muse Ember 评估结果

Evaluation resultsFeatured model. Muse Ember (max)Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)GPT-6 Luna (max)
AgentsAutomationBench-AAE2E business workflowsBest result. 37.813.920.2
Agents' Last ExamEnd-to-end agent tasksBest result. 61.657.057.1
Personal Superintelligence IndexInternal composite index of personal and knowledge workBest result. 46.836.137.0
CodingTerminal-Bench 4.0Agentic terminal coding, best published harnessBest result. 40.939.216.4
Coding Agent Index-AACoding in real agent harnessesBest result. 463731
FrontierCode 2.0-AAReal engineering tasks judged on mergeability27.2Best result. 34.925.2
MultimodalGDP.pdf-AAProfessional work over long documentsBest result. 22.820.8Best result. 22.8
OSWorld 2.1Computer use across desktop appsBest result. 69.5(partial)33.8(binary)68.9(partial)27.8(binary)50.5(partial)17.0(binary)
PerceptionBench (w/ tools)Fine-grained visual perceptionBest result. 80.678.662.8
GeneralArtificial Analysis IndexBest result. 36Best result. 3628
评估结果精选模型。Muse Ember (max)Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)GPT-6 Luna (max)
智能体AutomationBench-AAE2E 业务流程最佳结果。37.813.920.2
智能体上次考试端到端智能体任务最佳结果。61.657.057.1
个人超级智能指数个人与知识工作的内部综合指数最佳结果。46.836.137.0
编程Terminal-Bench 4.0代理式终端编程,最佳已发布基准测试最佳结果。40.939.216.4
编程智能体指数 - AA在真实代理基准测试中的编程能力最佳结果。463731
FrontierCode 2.0-AA根据可合并性评判的真实工程任务27.2最佳结果。34.925.2
多模态GDP.pdf-AA长文档的专业工作最佳结果。22.820.8最佳结果。22.8
OSWorld 2.1跨桌面应用的计算机使用最佳结果。69.5(部分)33.8(二进制)68.9(部分)27.8(二进制)50.5(部分)17.0(二进制)
PerceptionBench (带工具)细粒度视觉感知最佳结果。80.678.662.8
通用Artificial Analysis Index最佳结果。36最佳结果。3628

For more details about our evaluations, see our report.

有关我们评估的更多详细信息,请参阅我们的报告。

Muse Ember is available today on the Meta Model API, at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens.

Muse Ember 今天已在 Meta Model API 上提供,输入 token 价格为每百万 0.10 美元,输出 token 价格为每百万 0.50 美元。

In early testing, our partners put Muse Ember to work on the kinds of tasks agents repeat all day, from reviewing contracts to writing code.

在早期测试中,我们的合作伙伴让 Muse Ember 处理智能体整天重复执行的任务类型,从审查合同到编写代码。

BoxClineOracleCloudflareYou.com

Box

Previous slideNext slide

上一张幻灯片下一张幻灯片

“On the Box AI Complex Work Eval, Muse Ember delivers impressive accuracy, speed and token efficiency. It can score a contract against a company's negotiation playbook clause by clause and land on the right overall risk rating, or screen candidates against a detailed brief and flag the borderline ones who still qualify as alternates. Muse Ember is a fast, efficient foundation for agents doing real work on enterprise content.”

“在 Box AI 复杂工作评估中,Muse Ember 展现了令人印象深刻的准确性、速度和 token 效率。它可以逐条款将合同与公司谈判指南进行比对并得出正确的总体风险评级,或根据详细简报筛选候选人并标记那些仍符合资格的边缘人选。Muse Ember 是从事企业内容实际工作的智能体的快速、高效基础。”

Author

作者

Yashodha Bhavnani

Role

职位

VP of AI Products

AI 产品副总裁

Company

公司

Box

“It's incredible seeing Meta release a lightweight model for developers who want a fast, low-cost model they can rely on, and for teams cutting costs by running it as the subagent in their harness. Muse Ember is purpose-built for, and excels at, subagent work like coding and document analysis.”

“看到 Meta 为希望获得快速、低成本且可靠模型的开发者,以及通过将其作为子智能体运行以削减成本的团队发布轻量级模型,这令人惊叹。Muse Ember 专为子智能体工作而设计,并在编码和文档分析等子智能体工作中表现出色。”

Author

作者

Saoud Rizwan

Role

职位

Founder

创始人

Company

公司

Cline

“Muse Ember showed an encouraging ability to tackle complex engineering tasks in our early testing. We see strong potential for it to become a valuable tool for engineering teams.”

“在早期测试中,Muse Ember 展现了应对复杂工程任务的令人鼓舞的能力。我们认为它有很大潜力成为工程团队的宝贵工具。”

Author

作者

Konstantinos Papamiltiadis (kp)

Role

角色

SVP, Global Partnerships

全球合作伙伴关系高级副总裁

Company

公司

Oracle

甲骨文

“What stood out in our testing was speed. Muse Ember ran up to 30% faster at the tail than the comparable model we tested, and it handled broad, multi-repo investigation tasks well. It’s a strong fit for fast, high-throughput agentic workloads.”

“在我们的测试中,最引人注目的是速度。Muse Ember 在尾部处理速度比我们要测试的同类模型快高达 30%,并且能很好地处理广泛的、涉及多个仓库的调查任务。它非常适合快速、高吞吐量的智能体工作负载。”

Author

作者

Dane Knecht

Role

角色

CTO

首席技术官

Company

公司

Cloudflare

“Muse Ember completed every coding quest in our testing with the lowest latency of any model we tested: a p95 of 2.2 seconds, about 4x to 13x faster than leading open-weight models, and with 36–48% fewer output tokens. We’re excited about what Meta Superintelligence Labs is building next and about bringing it to our customers.”

“Muse Ember 在我们测试的所有编码任务中均完成了最低延迟:p95 为 2.2 秒,比领先的开源权重模型快约 4 到 13 倍,且输出 token 数量减少了 36–48%。我们对 Meta Superintelligence Labs 即将构建的内容感到兴奋,并期待将其带给我们的客户。”

Author

作者

Chak Pothina

Role

角色

Inference Lead

推理负责人

Company

公司

You.com

Agents

智能体

Agents spend most of their tokens on many small, structured steps, and Muse Ember is built for exactly that. It can carry a business workflow end to end, pulling records, calling tools in sequence, and updating systems across apps.

智能体将大部分 token 花费在许多小型的结构化步骤上,而 Muse Ember 正是为此而构建的。它可以端到端地执行业务工作流,提取记录、按顺序调用工具,并在跨应用系统中更新数据。

With a 1M-token context window and up to 512K output tokens, it can take in a full codebase or document set in a single call.

凭借 100 万 token 的上下文窗口和最多 51.2 万 token 的输出能力,它可以在单次调用中接收完整的代码库或文档集。

AutomationBench-AA

AutomationBench-AA results at max reasoning, reproduced from the doc's current chart.. Score

最大推理能力下的 AutomationBench-AA 结果,源自文档当前图表。得分

AutomationBench-AAMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%Score37.8%20.2%13.9%

AutomationBench-AAMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%得分37.8%20.2%13.9%

AutomationBench-AAMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%Score37.8%20.2%13.9%

AutomationBench-AAMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%得分37.8%20.2%13.9%

SeriesMeasurementValue
Muse Ember (max)ModelMuse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)Score37.8%
GPT-6 Luna (max)ModelGPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)Score20.2%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)ModelClaude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)Score13.9%
系列测量值数值
Muse Ember (max)模型Muse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)得分37.8%
GPT-6 Luna (max)模型GPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)得分20.2%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)模型Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)得分13.9%

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026. Strict pass@1.

Artificial Analysis | 2026年11月9日。严格 pass@1。

Agents' Last Exam

Agents' Last Exam results at max reasoning, reproduced from the doc's current chart.. Score

Agents' Last Exam 在最大推理能力下的结果,源自文档当前图表。得分

Agents' Last ExamMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Score61.6%57.1%57.0%

Agents' Last ExamMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%得分61.6%57.1%57.0%

Agents' Last ExamMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Score61.6%57.1%57.0%

Agents' Last ExamMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%得分61.6%57.1%57.0%

SeriesMeasurementValue
Muse Ember (max)ModelMuse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)Score61.6%
GPT-6 Luna (max)ModelGPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)Score57.1%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)ModelClaude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)Score57.0%
系列测量值数值
Muse Ember (max)模型Muse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)得分61.6%
GPT-6 Luna (max)模型GPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)得分57.1%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)模型Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)得分57.0%

Meta internal evaluation. Linux subset.

Meta 内部评估。Linux 子集。

Personal Superintelligence Index

Personal Superintelligence Index results at max reasoning, reproduced from the doc's current chart.. Score

Personal Superintelligence Index 在最大推理能力下的结果,源自文档当前图表。得分

Personal Superintelligence IndexMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%Score46.8%37.0%36.1%

Personal Superintelligence IndexMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)Claude Haiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%得分46.8%37.0%36.1%

Personal Superintelligence IndexMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%Score46.8%37.0%36.1%

Personal Superintelligence IndexMuse Ember(max)GPT-6 Luna(max)ClaudeHaiku 5.5(max)0%10%20%30%40%50%得分46.8%37.0%36.1%

SeriesMeasurementValue
Muse Ember (max)ModelMuse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)Score46.8%
GPT-6 Luna (max)ModelGPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)Score37.0%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)ModelClaude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)Score36.1%
系列测量值数值
Muse Ember (max)模型Muse Ember (max)
Muse Ember (max)得分46.8%
GPT-6 Luna (max)模型GPT-6 Luna (max)
GPT-6 Luna (max)得分37.0%
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)模型Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)得分36.1%

Internal composite index of personal and knowledge work.

个人与知识工作的内部综合指数。

Coding

编程

Muse Ember is built for the coding subtasks an agent sends off hundreds of times a session: reading files, running tests, making targeted fixes.

Muse Ember 专为智能体在每次会话中数百次调用的编程子任务而构建:读取文件、运行测试、进行针对性修复。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →