跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选82MortezaAI 产品与模型

用AI员工Viktor做创作者筛选与Brief匹配

Made a new hire on our creator team this month...

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

通过具体的内部工作流案例(筛选、匹配、核款)展示 AI 工具的实际应用效果,有清晰的结构和可参考的数据对比,写法值得同行学习。

Made a new hire on our creator team this month...

本月我们创作团队新增了一名成员……

He didn't get a laptop, he got our Slack, the roster sheet and every brief we're working on

他没有分到笔记本电脑,而是分配了我们的 Slack 账号、名单表以及我们正在处理的所有简报

His name is Viktor and he's an AI employee

他的名字叫 Viktor,是一名 AI 员工

Tbh the first week I used him like a search bar. One question, one answer, close the tab

说实话,第一周我像用搜索栏一样使用他。一个问题,一个答案,然后关闭标签页

Then we onboarded him like anyone else on the team and gave him 3 jobs:

然后我们像对待团队其他成员一样对他进行入职培训,并分配了 3 项工作:

1. Creator vetting: before we pitch anyone, he reads who actually replies under their posts

1. 创作者审核:在向任何人发出合作邀请前,他会阅读其帖子下真正回复的人是谁

2. Brief matching: every new brand brief goes to him first and comes back with a shortlist

2. 简报匹配:每个新的品牌简报都会先交给他,然后返回一份候选名单

3. Payout check: before anyone gets paid, he checks the post is still up and the numbers match

3. 付款核查:在任何人获得报酬之前,他会检查帖子是否仍然在线且数据相符

His first run: 50 creators, 12 matched the brief

首次运行结果:50 位创作者中,有 12 位符合简报要求

The result → 3 of the best fits had under 30K followers, creators we would have skipped if we only looked at follower count

结果 → 其中 3 位最匹配的创作者粉丝数不到 3 万,如果只看粉丝数,我们会跳过他们

He proposes, we decide. He never messages a creator or pays anyone on his own

他提出建议,我们做出决定。他从不自行联系创作者或支付任何费用

Follower count was never the job. Fit is

粉丝数量从来不是考核标准。契合度才是

Hire @viktor_com for your team. Start free.

为你的团队雇佣 @viktor_com。免费开始使用。

#AIemployee #InfluencerMarketing

#AI员工 # influencer营销

Paid Partnership

付费合作伙伴关系

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

关联信息,但可能不是同一事件