Gary Marcus评白宫AI协议：缺乏监管与公众参与
Hot take on a weak White House Accord on “Super Intelligence”
Here’s the Accord, which Trump apparently described as a “tremendous” exercise in “self-policing”:
这就是《协议》，特朗普显然将其描述为一项“自我监管”的“巨大”举措：
Reading the Accord between the lines
解读《协议》的字里行间
- We agree not be regulated
- We agree not to give the public a voice
- Trust us
- 我们同意不受监管
- 我们同意不赋予公众发言权
- 信任我们
Also, what does the word “independent” really mean above? Subcontractors working for other companies that we (the big companies who signed) choose and hang out with and perhaps already do business with?
此外，上面的“独立”一词究竟意味着什么？是为其他公司工作的分包商，而这些公司由我们（签署协议的各大公司）挑选、与之交往，甚至可能已经与我们有业务往来？
Finally, if I may ask, what happened to the Pacing everybody was talking about two weeks ago?
最后，如果我可以问的话，两周前大家都在谈论的“节奏控制”（Pacing）去哪了？
Surprise, surprise: Dario, Sam, and Elon all chickened out.
不出所料：达里奥、山姆和埃隆全都退缩了。
Subscribe now
立即订阅
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力