Anthropic发布Opus 5.5使用指南：删除提示词中的冗余指令
Anthropic just published a guide to using Opus 5.5. It tells you to delete "thin…
提供了可直接复用的Prompt模板来优化AI工作流，结构清晰且具备实操价值。
Anthropic just published a guide to using Opus 5.5. It tells you to delete "think carefully" from your prompts. You can ask Opus 5.5 to use it to review the old rules in your project.
Anthropic 刚刚发布了一份关于使用 Opus 5.5 的指南。它告诉你从提示词中删除“仔细思考”。你可以让 Opus 5.5 用它来审查项目中的旧规则。
It already thinks before every reply, and it decides how much. Delete that line and replies start sooner, with no drop in quality. If your CLAUDE.md still says "take a deep breath" or "IMPORTANT: think hard," delete those too.
它已经在每次回复前进行思考，并自行决定思考的深度。删除该行后，回复开始得更快，且质量不会下降。如果你的 CLAUDE.md 仍然包含“深呼吸”或“重要：深入思考”，也请一并删除。
Send this prompt and the link below to Opus 5.5 👇
将此提示词和下面的链接发送给 Opus 5.5 👇
"Read this guide and review my project's CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, skills, and saved prompts. Find three kinds of problems: lines that push you to think more, like 'think carefully' or 'take a deep breath'; rules and prompts that hand out tasks one step at a time or don't define what done looks like; and rules that make you stop for confirmation when you don't need to.
“阅读这份指南，并审查我项目的 CLAUDE.md、AGENTS.md、技能（skills）和已保存的提示词。找出三类问题：促使你更多思考的行，例如‘仔细思考’或‘深呼吸’；一次只分配一个步骤的任务规则或未定义完成标准的规则；以及在你不需要确认时却要求你停下来等待确认的规则。”
For each issue, quote the original instruction, explain its impact, and suggest the smallest change needed. List any approval rules involving safety, permissions, or destructive actions separately for me to decide. Also suggest adding one rule: at the end of every long run, report under three headings: Blocked on me, Changed, Found.
对于每个问题，引用原始指令，解释其影响，并建议所需的最小改动。将涉及安全、权限或破坏性操作的审批规则单独列出，以便我做出决定。此外，建议添加一条规则：在每次长流程结束时，在三个标题下报告：阻塞于我、已更改、已发现。
Show me the recommendations first. Don't modify anything yet."
先向我展示建议。暂时不要修改任何内容。'
https://claude.dev/blog/getting-the-most-out-of-opus-5-5/
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力