跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选65Serenity行业动态多源精选 ×3

Marvell收购Lumentum交易细节与估值分析

$LITE standalone would likely be up on earnings after their new $5B CPO/NPO anno…

原文
发到 X

$LITE standalone would likely be up on earnings after their new $5B CPO/NPO announcement (separate from $NVDA).

$LITE 独立运营后,在宣布新的 50 亿美元 CPO/NPO 项目(与 $NVDA 无关)后,其盈利状况可能会改善。

The margins on that are likely 60%+… which shows how profitable laser players would be at scale.

该业务的利润率可能在 60% 以上……这表明激光厂商在规模化生产时将具有极高的盈利能力。

(Greensboro alone would be $5B revenue/year)

(仅格林斯伯勒一地每年就能带来 50 亿美元的营收)

In terms of the $MRVL deal:

关于 $MRVL 的交易方面:

  • Extremely positive for Marvell strategically. Also makes remaining laser players very valuable
  • $LITE shareholders can cry though about the 1+ year overhang until deal goes through in 2028.
  • 这对 Marvell 的战略非常有利。同时也使得其他剩余的激光厂商变得非常有价值。
  • 不过,$LITE 的股东们可能要忍受长达一年多的不确定性悬顶,直到交易在 2028 年完成。

There’s less independent price discovery as well since a lot of it will be pegged around 4.5 Marvell shares : 1

此外,由于大部分定价将锚定在 4.5 股 Marvell 股票换 1 股的比例上,独立的价格发现机制也会减少。

  • I think Lumentum shareholders probably would be happier if Marvell shares didn’t crash before the deal was announced..
  • 我认为,如果 Marvell 的股票在交易宣布前没有暴跌,Lumentum 的股东们可能会更开心一些。

since it was originally valuing $LITE at $115B with a 23.9% premium.

因为最初是以 1150 亿美元估值 $LITE,并给出了 23.9% 的溢价。

  • Marvell dropping does show the downside of the deal straight away though, if it rose then $LITE shareholders might be a tad happier given valuation.
  • 不过,Marvell 股价下跌确实立即显示了该交易的 downside(下行风险),如果股价上涨,考虑到估值因素,$LITE 的股东们可能会稍微高兴一点。

Having a fixed dollar MC value floor probably would have been better than the 4.5x:1 ratio.

设定一个固定的市值美元底线可能比 4.5:1 的比率更好。

There was a lot of long $LITE, short ___ pressuring other photonics valuations, so at least those trade pairs might unwind now

此前有很多做多 $LITE、做空其他光子学公司的头寸在压制其他光子学公司的估值,所以至少这些交易组合现在可能会平仓。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →