跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选88r/LLMDevs(Reddit)模型发布/更新

Commerce-1:面向电商 Agent 决策的开源 27B 模型

Commerce-1: an open-weight 27B decision model for commerce agents

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

Agent 开发者关注,这款模型针对特定决策场景优化,零生成 Token 且性能指标明确,值得集成测试。

We built Commerce-1 for a specific part of an AI agent: the moment it must choose an action.

我们为 AI 智能体的特定部分构建了 Commerce-1:即它必须选择行动的时刻。

A commerce agent may need to select a product, resolve an inventory conflict, route a payment, choose a fulfillment path, prioritize a return, or escalate an uncertain transaction.

商业智能体可能需要选择产品、解决库存冲突、路由支付、选择履约路径、优先处理退货,或升级不确定的交易。

These are usually bounded decisions with known candidate actions. They don't always need another generated paragraph.

这些通常是具有已知候选行动的有界决策。它们并不总是需要生成另一段文本。

How it works

工作原理

Commerce-1 receives a structured state and ordered Choice, Noul, or Score questions. It scores the supplied options directly and returns typed answers with an ordered probability distribution.

Commerce-1 接收结构化状态以及有序的 Choice、Noul 或 Score 问题。它直接对提供的选项进行评分,并返回带有有序概率分布的类型化答案。

  • Zero generated output tokens
  • Up to 255 candidate actions
  • Typed decisions and probability distributions
  • Choice-order augmentation and per-primitive held-out temperature calibration
  • 零生成输出令牌
  • 最多 255 个候选行动
  • 类型化决策和概率分布
  • Choice 顺序增强和每个基元保留温度校准

The model builds on perplexity-ai/pplx-decider-v1.1-27b, using a noncausal full-attention decision backbone, last-position pooling, and a dedicated decision readout.

该模型基于 perplexity-ai/pplx-decider-v1.1-27b,采用非因果全注意力决策主干、最后位置池化和专用的决策读取头。

Benchmarks

基准测试

We reproduced the complete Decision Index 0.2.1 public suite:

我们复现了完整的 Decision Index 0.2.1 公开套件:

MetricResult
Decision Index score60.99
Evaluation rows150,317
Throughput (1× H200)8.836 decisions/sec
Three-decision fixture p50340.146 ms
Three-decision fixture p95349.026 ms
指标结果
Decision Index 得分60.99
评估行数150,317
吞吐量 (1× H200)8.836 次决策/秒
三次决策固定装置 p50340.146 毫秒
三次决策固定装置 p95349.026 毫秒

These measurements come from our qualified single-H200 runtime.

这些测量数据来自我们合格的单 H200 运行时环境。

Limitations

局限性

There are important boundaries:

存在重要的边界条件:

  • Current BF16 weights are approximately 54 GiB.
  • This release is qualified on one NVIDIA H200.
  • Commerce-1 recommends actions; application code remains responsible for inventory truth, payments, fraud rules, budgets, and execution.
  • 当前的 BF16 权重约为 54 GiB。
  • 此版本在单个 NVIDIA H200 上经过合格认证。
  • Commerce-1 推荐行动;应用程序代码仍负责库存真实性、支付、欺诈规则、预算和执行。

Open source and demos

开源与演示

The model weights are public. The runtime source is Apache-2.0, with model and training-source notices documented separately.

模型权重是公开的。运行时源代码采用 Apache-2.0 许可证,模型和训练来源通知单独记录。

  • Model weights: https://huggingface.co/infercrane/Commerce-1
  • GitHub / local runtime: https://github.com/infercrane/commerce-1
  • Interactive demos: https://huggingface.co/spaces/infercrane/commerce-1-arcade
  • Technical article: https://infercrane.com/blog/commerce-1
  • 模型权重:https://huggingface.co/infercrane/Commerce-1
  • GitHub / 本地运行时:https://github.com/infercrane/commerce-1
  • 交互式演示:https://huggingface.co/spaces/infercrane/commerce-1-arcade
  • 技术文章:https://infercrane.com/blog/commerce-1

Feedback wanted

期待您的反馈

For developers building commerce agents: Would a native Decisions SDK or broader OpenAI-compatible tooling make this easier to integrate into your stack?

对于正在构建商务智能体的开发者:原生的 Decisions SDK 或更广泛的 OpenAI 兼容工具集,是否能让将其集成到您的技术栈中变得更加容易?

I'd also be interested in hearing which bounded decisions in your agents are currently handled by general-purpose LLMs.

我也很感兴趣,想了解您的智能体中目前由通用大语言模型(LLM)处理的具体决策场景有哪些。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

关联信息,但可能不是同一事件