跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选88Hacker News Best(web_list)行业动态

OpenAI高管曾担心Hacker News曝光使用盗版书籍训练模型

OpenAI Feared "Optics" of what might appear on Hacker News

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

诉讼披露的内部邮件直接证实了OpenAI早期对数据合规风险的知情态度,是理解AI行业版权争议的关键一手证据,从业者必读。

All News

全部新闻

Press Releases

新闻稿

Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Top Execs Knew Their Mass Book Piracy Was Illegal And Would Put Authors Out of Work

作者诉微软/OpenAI案中的未密封简报:高管明知其大规模盗版行为违法,并将导致作者失业

Added to last week’s revelations, new filings reveal OpenAI's lawless determination to do virtually anything to win the AI arms race, including using books from a “sketchy Russian website” and releasing products “that will make people unemployed”

继上周披露的内容之后,新提交的档案显示,OpenAI以无视法律的态度决心在人工智能军备竞赛中获胜,包括使用来自“可疑俄罗斯网站”的书籍,并发布“将导致人们失业”的产品

September 21, 2026

2026年9月21日

  • Share
  • on Twitter (opens in a new tab)
  • on Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • on Linkedin (opens in a new tab)
  • via email
  • 分享
  • 在 Twitter 上(在新标签页中打开)
  • 在 Facebook 上(在新标签页中打开)
  • 在 Linkedin 上(在新标签页中打开)
  • 通过电子邮件

(New York, September 21, 2026) Explosive new documents released last Thursday in Authors Guild v. OpenAI—the major book authors’ ongoing lawsuit alleging OpenAI and Microsoft illegally trained their products on copyrighted books—show that executives and employees at both companies intentionally broke the law and their disdain for human authorship. The brief meticulously documents AI developers’ knowledge of the damage their actions could do to authors, publishers, and American culture itself, warning that “OpenAI’s GPT models pose an existential threat to those who write and publish books.”

(纽约,2026年9月21日)上周四在作家协会诉OpenAI案中公布的爆炸性新文件——这是一起主要图书作家提起的ongoing诉讼,指控OpenAI和微软非法在其产品中训练受版权保护的书籍——表明两家公司的高管和员工故意违反法律,并表现出对人类创作的蔑视。该简报细致地记录了人工智能开发者对其行为可能对作者、出版商乃至美国文化本身造成损害的认知,并发出警告称:“OpenAI的GPT模型对撰写和出版图书的人构成生存威胁。”

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include The Authors Guild, writers David Baldacci, Taylor Branch, Michael Connelly, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen, Christopher Golden, Andrew Sean Greer, John Grisham, David Henry Hwang, Matthew Klam, George R.R. Martin, Jodi Picoult, Stacy Schiff, James Shapiro, and others. Their filings (here and here) mark a turning point in the case, putting the defendant companies’ guilty knowledge and reckless actions at the center of the narrative.

本案原告包括作家协会、作家大卫·巴尔达奇(David Baldacci)、泰勒·布兰奇(Taylor Branch)、迈克尔·康奈利(Michael Connelly)、西尔维亚·戴(Sylvia Day)、乔纳森·弗兰岑(Jonathan Franzen)、克里斯托弗·戈登(Christopher Golden)、安德鲁·肖恩·格里尔(Andrew Sean Greer)、约翰·格里沙姆(John Grisham)、大卫·亨利·黄(David Henry Hwang)、马修·克拉姆(Matthew Klam)、乔治·R·R·马丁(George R.R. Martin)、乔迪·皮科尔特(Jodi Picoult)、斯塔西·席夫(Stacy Schiff)、詹姆斯·沙皮罗(James Shapiro)等人。他们提交的档案(此处和此处)标志着案件的一个转折点,将被告公司的有罪认知和鲁莽行为置于叙事的核心位置。

Authors Guild CEO Mary Rasenberger observed, “These filings reveal shocking disdain for writers and their work through repeated, intentional decisions to steal books rather than pay for them with full knowledge that their products will destroy the careers of authors. OpenAI pursued its mass piracy scheme even in the face of clear evidence that doing so would degrade American culture by substituting human works with AI slop and would put thousands of writers out of work. We are grateful to our entire legal team for uncovering and telling this critical story.”

作家协会首席执行官玛丽·拉森伯格(Mary Rasenberger)表示:“这些文件揭示了通过反复、故意决定窃取书籍而非付费购买所表现出的对作家及其作品的令人震惊的蔑视,且完全知晓其产品将摧毁作者的职业生涯。即使在面临明确证据表明此举将通过用人工智能垃圾作品取代人类作品而损害美国文化,并使数千名作家失业的情况下,OpenAI仍继续推进其大规模盗版计划。我们感谢整个法律团队揭露并讲述这一关键故事。”

Alongside equally scorching but separate revelations in a brief filed by news media organizations, the authors’ brief reveals:

与新闻媒体组织提交的另一份同样严厉但独立的简报中的惊人披露并列,作者的简报揭示了:

  • OpenAI and Microsoft Knew Their Systems Would Replace Human Writers – OpenAI Policy Director Jack Clark stated in May 2020: “Our work on AI and Creativity is going to increasingly lead to us creating systems that substitute for the labor of [] people . . . The better we do on GPT-X, the more worried genre fiction authors will become about us substituting for them on Amazon.” He then doubled down: “Our work in this area will make people unemployed. . . There will be a point where a bunch of artists express worry about what we’re doing here and we’ll likely ignore their concerns and release anyway . . .”
  • “Autocompleting” Other People’s Work – OpenAI hired Tarun Gogineni in 2022 to lead its efforts to improve the writing quality of its models. Gogineni stated his “research mission” was to have GPT models write the “last two books of [Martin’s] A Song of Ice and Fire” series by “finishing it one day.” Gogineni even mused that he would “rest easy knowing that even if GRRM [George R. R. Martin] dies early, GPT-5 will autocomplete his series.”
  • “Acceptable Economic Disruption.” – “Although [Gogineni] was aware of authors’ complaints that the ‘datasets are stolen’ and that authors were losing work to AI-generated competition, he did not find those complaints ‘all that sympathetic’ and instead viewed them as ‘acceptable economic disruption.’ He wrote that the world would soon experience ‘the death of the reader’ as ‘machines creat[ed] slop for more machines.’”
  • Microsoft Knew OpenAI Used Pirated Books from the Start – “Microsoft knew about OpenAI’s use of LibGen as early as April 2019 when Sam Altman and Dario Amodei presented an early version of GPT-3 to Bill Gates and disclosed the use of LibGen to Gates and Microsoft’s Chief Technology Officer Kevin Scott, among others.”
  • OpenAI Feared “Optics,” Not the Law – “Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s then-Research Director, responded that ‘as a training set [LibGen is] a bit sketchier.’ [OpenAI researcher Sam] McCandlish explained: ‘I was just worried about optics – i.e. ‘openai uses copyrighted data from sketchy russian website’ showing up on [Hacker News] would be unfortunate.”
  • They Tried to Hide the Evidence – In an effort to cover its tracks the company called “Project Clear,” OpenAI deleted its LibGen files in the summer of 2022. “On June 15, 2022, in an OpenAI Slack channel, [OpenAI Corporate Designee] Paino asked: ‘general q: how concerned are we about mentions of libgen? (they’re all over google docs/slack/github . . .). That evening, [OpenAI VP of Research Bob] McGrew wrote to Paino and Nicholas Ryder: “Given how much OpenAI is in the news, now is the right time to excise Libgen from our systems and storage. What would be involved in that?’”
  • OpenAI 和微软深知其系统将取代人类作家——OpenAI 政策总监 Jack Clark 于 2020 年 5 月表示:“我们在 AI 与创意方面的工作将日益导致我们创造出替代 [] 人力的系统……我们在 GPT-X 上做得越好,类型小说作者就越担心我们会取代他们在亚马逊上的地位。”随后他进一步强调:“我们在此领域的工作将导致人们失业……届时,一批艺术家会对我们在此所做之事表达担忧,而我们很可能会无视他们的关切并照常发布……”
  • “自动补全”他人的作品——OpenAI 于 2022 年聘请 Tarun Gogineni 领导提升其模型写作质量的工作。Gogineni 称其“研究使命”是让 GPT 模型通过“总有一天完成它”的方式写出马丁《冰与火之歌》系列的“最后两本书”。Gogineni 甚至遐想,如果乔治·R·R·马丁(GRRM)早逝,他将因知道 GPT-5 会为其系列作品进行自动补全而“安心”。
  • “可接受的经济破坏”——尽管 Gogineni 知晓作者们抱怨“数据集是被盗取的”,且作者正失去工作给 AI 生成的竞争者,但他并不觉得这些抱怨“多么令人同情”,反而将其视为“可接受的经济破坏”。他写道,世界即将经历“读者的消亡”,因为“机器将为更多机器制造垃圾内容”。
  • 微软从一开始就知晓 OpenAI 使用盗版书籍——“早在 2020 年 4 月,当 Sam Altman 和 Dario Amodei 向比尔·盖茨展示 GPT-3 的早期版本时,微软就已知晓 OpenAI 使用 LibGen 的情况,并向盖茨及微软首席技术官 Kevin Scott 等人披露了使用 LibGen 一事。”
  • OpenAI 担忧的是‘舆论’而非法律——OpenAI 时任研究总监 Dario Amodei 回应称,“作为训练集,[LibGen] 确实有些可疑。”[OpenAI 研究员 Sam] McCandlish 解释道:“我只是担心舆论影响——即‘openai 从可疑的俄罗斯网站使用受版权保护的数据’这样的说法出现在 [Hacker News] 上会很不幸。”
  • 他们试图掩盖证据——为了掩人耳目,该公司启动了“清理计划”(Project Clear),OpenAI 于 2022 年夏季删除了其 LibGen 文件。“2022 年 6 月 15 日,在 OpenAI 的 Slack 频道中,[OpenAI 公司指定代表] Paino 问道:‘一般性问题:我们对提及 LibGen 的关注程度如何?(它们在 Google Docs/Slack/GitHub 上到处都是……)。当晚,[OpenAI 研究副总裁 Bob] McGrew 向 Paino 和 Nicholas Ryder 写道:‘鉴于 OpenAI 近期新闻不断,现在是时候从我们的系统和存储中剔除 LibGen 了。这需要涉及哪些工作?’”

All quotes taken from Class Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket 1982) and Class Plaintiffs’ Corrected Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Docket 1987).

所有引文均摘自集体原告支持部分简易判决动议的法律备忘录(案卷号 1982)以及集体原告修正后的 Rule 56.1 无争议实质事实陈述(案卷号 1987)。

This briefing was filed in the class action case brought on behalf of the Authors Guild and book copyright owners, Alter v. OpenAI and Microsoft, with lead counsel Justin A. Nelson from Susman Godfrey. The case is part of multidistrict litigation against those defendants pending in Manhattan. We expect more briefing over the next couple months and a hearing in early 2027.

本简报系在代表作者协会及图书版权所有者提起的集体诉讼 Alter v. OpenAI and Microsoft 一案中提交,首席律师为 Susman Godfrey 律师事务所的 Justin A. Nelson。该案是曼哈顿 pending 的多区诉讼的一部分。我们预计在未来几个月内会有更多简报提交,并于 2027 年初举行听证会。

About the Authors Guild and Authors Guild Foundation

关于作者协会及作者协会基金会

With more than 18,000 members, the Authors Guild is the nation’s oldest and largest professional organization for published writers. It advocates on behalf of working writers to protect free speech, freedom of expression, and authors’ copyrights; fights for fair contracts and authors ability to earn a livable wage; and provides a welcoming community for writers and translators of fiction, nonfiction, poetry, and journalism. Through its educational and charitable arm, the Authors Guild Foundation, it also offers free programming to teach working writers about the business of writing, as well as organizing public events that highlight the importance of a rich, diverse American literary culture and the authors who contribute to it.

作者协会拥有超过 18,000 名成员,是美国历史最悠久、规模最大的出版作家专业组织。它代表在职作家发声,以保护言论自由、表达自由以及作者的版权;争取公平合同和作家获得体面收入的能力;并为小说、非虚构作品、诗歌和新闻领域的作家和译者提供一个友好的社区。通过其教育和慈善部门作者协会基金会,它还提供免费课程,教导在职作家了解写作业务,并组织公共活动,强调丰富多元的美国文学文化及其贡献者的重要性。

Become a Member

成为会员

Join the Guild and support our work to protect authors’ rights.

加入协会,支持我们保护作者权利的工作。

Join now

立即加入

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

关联信息,但可能不是同一事件