跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选68Greg Isenberg(YouTube)产品与增长

Jev:低成本高并发AI分类器原理与邮件处理实战

Jev is HERE. How to use it

原文
发到 X

Jev is here and it's a big deal. It was created by Dooo Almeida. Yes, that's the same guy whose research built chatbt. Now, it's such a big deal because it's a whole new way to do AI. So, I brought on my friend Ryan who's on the founding team of Open Code to just come on and clearly explain what Jev is, what are some insane use cases, and break down some startup ideas that are now unlocked. As of publishing this, Jev is invite only.

Jev 来了,而且这是一件大事。它由 Dooo Almeida 创建。是的,就是那位研究成果构建了 chatbt 的同一位人士。现在,之所以如此重要,是因为它是一种全新的 AI 实现方式。所以我请来了我的朋友 Ryan,他是 Open Code 创始团队成员之一,来为我们清晰地解释 Jev 是什么、有哪些令人惊叹的使用场景,并拆解一些由此解锁的创业点子。截至本文发布时,Jev 仅限邀请制访问。

But good news, by the end of the episode, you're going to see how you can get access today. So, you're going to want to like, comment, and subscribe right now so your algorithm knows to bring you content like this to get your creative juices flowing in the future. Happy Jev Day, and I'll see you at the end of the episode. Ryan Vogle, welcome to the pod. By the end of the episode, what are people going to learn?

但好消息是,在本集节目结束时,你将看到如何今天就能获得访问权限。所以,你现在就要点赞、评论和订阅,这样你的算法才知道要为你推送这类内容,以便在未来激发你的创意灵感。祝 Jev 日快乐,我们本集结尾见。Ryan Vogle,欢迎来到播客。在本集结束时,大家将会学到什么?

We're going to learn about a new type of AI, a an type of AI that we haven't really seen before, but I think it's good. It's Jev. And uh people are ready for this new type of classifier AI because we've been so used to just learning and using these LLMs which are slow they stream and I think uh as we'll cover today this AI is fundamentally different in so many different ways with quality speed and price that there are so many different usage applications for it that the possibilities are truly endless and It just becomes on the humans again about how creative you can be.

我们将了解一种新型 AI,一种我们此前未曾真正见过、但我认为很棒的 AI,那就是 Jev。人们已经准备好迎接这种新的分类器 AI,因为我们早已习惯于学习和使用这些 LLM(大语言模型),它们速度缓慢且需要流式输出。我认为,正如我们今天所涵盖的那样,这种 AI 在质量、速度和价格等多个方面有着根本性的不同,因此拥有众多不同的应用场景,可能性 truly 无穷无尽。最终,这又回到了人类身上:你能发挥多大的创造力。

Cool. And I So I just have a few things I need from you because I haven't used Jev. I want you to give me the simplest possible explanation to Jev. I want you to ex give me like, you know, three or four insane use cases so that people can walk away from this episode with like productivity, making money, just like, you know, even boring use cases that could become, you know, $10 million businesses, $100 million businesses.

酷。我有一些东西需要你帮忙,因为我还没用过 Jev。我希望你给我一个关于 Jev 尽可能简单的解释。我还希望你提供三四个令人惊叹的使用场景,让人们听完这期节目后能带走一些关于提升生产力、赚钱的想法,甚至是那些看似无聊却可能发展成千万美元甚至亿美元企业的用例。

And I just want you to put it all together, wrap it in a bow that people understand, you know, if they stick around to the end that they'll be able to understand why should they care about it. Can you commit to that, Ryan Vogle?

然后我希望你把所有内容整合起来,用通俗易懂的方式呈现,让坚持听到最后的人能够理解为什么他们应该关心这件事。Ryan Vogle,你能承诺做到吗?

I can. I can. And I'll add one better. I'll make it entertaining so that way you can actually get excited about it because first up, I'm just going to start out with a demo. This is my email. I'm not afraid to share it. I uh been working with email. If you know me at all, you know that I love email because it seems unsolved. I mean, like, Greg, how many spam emails do you get every day? Like, there's too many, right?

我可以。我可以。而且我会做得更好。我会让它变得有趣,这样你们才能真正为此感到兴奋。首先,我将先进行一个演示。这是我的邮箱,我不介意分享它。我一直在研究邮件。如果你对我有所了解,你就知道我爱邮件,因为它似乎仍未被彻底解决。我的意思是,Greg,你每天收到多少垃圾邮件?太多了,对吧?

There's too many. You can't reply to all of them. And it's just so frustrating. And some of the email algorithms that exist are good, but it's not the best. But then some people are trying to like take like traditional AI where it's like they're having like a GPT 5.6 Luna like kind of read every email and then score it, but that takes time and it's not like instant and it's just like h I wish we could just have something that could like instantly categorize all the emails.

邮件太多了,你无法回复所有邮件。这真的让人很沮丧。虽然现有的某些邮件算法还不错,但并非最佳。另一方面,有些人试图采用传统的 AI 方法,比如让类似 GPT 5.6 Luna 的模型阅读每封邮件并进行评分,但这需要时间,不是即时的,所以我只希望有一种能即时对所有邮件进行分类的工具。

So this is that this is using Jev. And before I run it, uh I'm going to break down Jev in a super simple example. Jev is a classifier at its truest being that's what it is. I won't get into the architecture and stuff like that because honestly I don't even understand it that well, but essentially you define an input. Let's say uh you have this iPhone as an input, right? And that's the input and then the output is a schema.

所以这里使用的是 Jev。在运行它之前,我会用一个超级简单的例子来拆解 Jev。Jev 本质上就是一个分类器,这就是它的定义。我不会深入探讨架构之类的内容,因为老实说我也没完全搞懂,但基本上你需要定义一个输入。假设我们以这个 iPhone 作为输入,对吧?这就是输入,而输出则是一个模式(schema)。

So we could uh have the schema be what color is the iPhone is the question almost. and it has uh blue, orange, red, green, yellow as the output options for that question. And the classifier Jev then looks at this phone in a text uh format and says, "hm, what uh is this orange? Is it is it red? It could be red." But then it says, okay, this is about I'm pretty confident it's 80% orange, but it could be 10% red or it could be 10% blue, which adds up to 100.

所以我们可以让模式成为问题的答案,比如“iPhone 是什么颜色?”这个问题。对于该问题,输出选项包括蓝色、橙色、红色、绿色和黄色。然后分类器 Jev 会以文本格式查看这部手机并说道:“嗯,这是什么?是橙色吗?还是红色?可能是红色。”但它接着会说,好吧,我相当有把握认为它是 80% 的橙色,但也可能是 10% 的红色或 10% 的蓝色,加起来正好是 100%。

And it's the probabilities of those choices. So, it's not just going to be a 100% affirmative. This is orange, this is blue, this is red. It's a hey, I'm 80% confident that this is orange or this is red. And the best way to illustrate that is with this email example. So each one of these rows that you see on the table is a full email object. It's got a subject. It's got a description. It's got a body. It's got a sender.

这些就是各个选项的概率。所以结果不会只是 100% 肯定的判断,比如“这是橙色,这是蓝色,这是红色”。而是说:“我有 80% 的把握认为这是橙色或红色。”用这个邮件例子来说明这一点是最好的。因此,你在表中看到的每一行都是一个完整的邮件对象。它有主题、描述、正文和发件人。

All the the snazzy email jazz. And what the input is is that just entire email object. There's no sugar coding or any special treatment. It's just the email object. And we have four outputs. We've got a category which is an option where basically it can say is this shopping, work, marketing, finance, security, yada yada yada. Then we've got a priority which it can allow to select from I think five different options where it's like low priority, medium, high, important or urgent which is like oh no, you have a missed credit card payment or something like that.

所有那些花哨的邮件信息。而输入就是这个完整的邮件对象。没有特殊的编码处理或任何特殊待遇,就是纯粹的邮件对象。我们有四个输出项。一个是类别,这是一个选项,基本上它可以表示这是购物、工作、营销、财务、安全等等。另一个是优先级,它可以从我认为的五种不同选项中选取,比如低优先级、中等、高、重要或紧急,后者类似于“哦不,你漏付了信用卡账单”之类的情况。

That's obviously urgent. You want to be able to nail that right on the head as soon as that comes in. And then we have a spam score. This is what I was talking about with those percentages. Obviously, not every email is going to be a true or false when it comes to spam. It's going to be a percentage. It's it's a it's a range, if you will. So, it's like some emails are more spammy, like this uh Kickstarter one. It's obviously trying to sell me a bunch of stuff and junk.

这显然是紧急的。你需要在收到邮件的第一时间就能准确判断出来。然后我们还有一个垃圾邮件评分。这就是我刚才提到的那些百分比的含义。显然,就垃圾邮件而言,并非每封邮件都是非黑即白的。它是一个百分比,或者说是一个范围。所以,有些邮件更像垃圾邮件,比如这个 Kickstarter 的邮件。它显然是在试图向我推销一堆东西和杂物。

I don't really care about that. I signed up for that Kickstarter thing like two years ago. Still haven't been able to unsubscribe from the list since. And then we've got some uh some like Mercury things. Okay, this is just like a payment thing. It's like, okay, Exxon Enterprise received $22 from Stripe. That doesn't seem spammy. That seems just like it's infor uh informative uh and it's just informing me that uh something happened.

我其实并不在意那个。我大概两年前注册了那个 Kickstarter 项目。从那以后我就一直没能从列表中退订。然后我们还有一些像 Mercury 这样的邮件。好的,这就像是一笔付款通知。意思是,好的,Exxon Enterprise 收到了来自 Stripe 的 22 美元。这看起来不像垃圾邮件。这看起来只是信息性的,它在通知我某件事发生了。

And then we've got the reply percentage. This is how much does this warrant your reply. So, if we go back here, and I'm not going to click on this because this is a real email, but 90% account violation possibility. This is a user saying, "Hey, my account seems to be violated somehow." Jev identified, hey, this user seems to be having some trouble. We should probably warrant a response on this. Now, I've already got these all uh categorized, and there are uh 1,700 of these emails.

然后我们有回复概率。这是指这封邮件值得你回复的程度。所以,如果我们回到这里,我不会点击它,因为这是一封真实的邮件,但有 90% 的账户违规可能性。这是一个用户说:“嘿,我的账户似乎以某种方式被侵犯了。”Jev 识别出,嘿,这个用户似乎遇到了一些麻烦。我们应该对此做出回应。现在,我已经把这些邮件都分类好了,总共有 1,700 封这样的邮件。

And and and this is where we come back where it's it's so sad because it just takes so much time to run all of these and it's probably going to take like 10 hours to do and then and then I'm going to have to go through and probably pick out some of the data and oh my god the price is going to be so expensive and oh it it's done. Oh it didn't cost 18 cents

这就是我们要回来的地方,这太令人难过了,因为运行所有这些操作需要花费大量时间,可能需要大约 10 个小时,然后我还得去筛选一些数据,天哪,价格会非常昂贵,哦,它完成了。哦,它并没有花费 18 美分

1,700 emails.

1,700 封邮件。

That is the power of Jev. I can't explain it any better than that. We had 4.2 million input tokens and 500,000 output tokens. The entire cost was 18 cents for each one of those emails. All categorized, all I mean, you can see here they're all categorized. They're all ranked. They're all given that score.

这就是 Jev 的力量。我无法用更好的语言来解释它。我们有 420 万输入 token 和 50 万输出 token。每封邮件的总成本仅为 18 美分。所有邮件都已分类,我是说,你可以在这里看到它们都已分类。它们都已排名。它们都得到了评分。

So, if you were to imagine like let's say

所以,如果你想象一下,比如说

Ryan, what I'm here's what I'm hearing. I just want to make sure I I I have a good mental model for what Jeb is and correct me you know where I'm wrong. Okay.

Ryan,我在这里听到的是我想确保我对 Jeb 有一个良好的心智模型,如果我错了请纠正我。好的。

So Jev is basically like an AI decision maker.

所以 Jev 基本上就像一个 AI 决策者。

Yes.

是的。

So you you give it some information. In this case you're giving it you know the contents of the email and like a set of possible choices like is it spam or not? Jev's going to go ahead and look at that information and choose an answer. So, for example, like is this email spam or urgent or no normal? Um, but you can also have it do things like, you know, is this customer likely to buy or unlikely to buy,

所以,你给它一些信息。在这种情况下,你提供的是邮件内容以及一组可能的选项,比如它是否是垃圾邮件?Jev 会查看这些信息并选择一个答案。例如,这封邮件是垃圾邮件、紧急事项还是普通邮件?嗯,但你也可以让它执行其他任务,比如判断这位客户是否可能购买或不太可能购买,

right? Exactly. You're almost there. That's like 90% correct. It makes a it makes a probability of a decision.

对吧?没错。你已经快掌握了。这就像 90% 正确率一样。它会做出一个决策的概率。

Okay. So the difference between it making a decision because a decision would be you uh like you uh submit an API or something like that and it tells you buy or not to buy. Technically what happens on the underside is that percentage. So it would

好的。那么它做出决策的区别在于:决策意味着你提交一个 API 调用之类的操作,然后它告诉你买或不买。从技术层面来说,底层发生的是这个百分比计算。所以它会

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

关联讨论

同一事件的更多信源

相似阅读

关联信息,但可能不是同一事件