陶哲轩发文回应25位菲尔兹奖得主反AI宣言
A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics
A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics
AI在数学领域的严重错位
New blog post by Terry Tao and a new anti-AI declaration signed by 25 Fields medallists.
特里·陶（Terry Tao）发布的新博客文章，以及25位菲尔兹奖得主签署的新反AI宣言。
I'm not sure what the intendent effect should be. The ban of AI use in mathematics and science in general because of "math community"?
我不确定预期的效果应该是什么。因为所谓的“数学界”而禁止在数学和科学中使用AI？
Fortunately math community is broader than just math academia, and thanks to AI, booming like never before.
幸运的是，数学界不仅仅局限于数学学术界，而且得益于AI，它正以前所未有的势头蓬勃发展。
Also this "mass production of true/false statements" is such a wrong description. As if there's no proofs by AI that you can study, deepen your knowledge, build upon, engage. The "AI slop" is still better written than what 90% of mathematicians write.
此外，这种对‘真假陈述的大规模生产’的描述是错误的。仿佛不存在可供你研究、深化知识、在此基础上构建并参与讨论的AI证明。所谓的‘AI垃圾内容’的写作质量仍优于90%的数学家所写的内容。
Mathematics doesn't belong to math academia. It is a tool to understand the world and help other domains with necessary tooling. AI boosts the understanding and engages wider community.
数学不属于数学学术界。它是理解世界的工具，并为其他领域提供必要的技术支持。AI促进了理解，并吸引了更广泛的社区参与。
Swan song of academia.
学术界的挽歌。
Link: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/11/a-severe-misalignment-of-ai-in-mathematics/
链接：https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/11/a-severe-misalignment-of-ai-in-mathematics/
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力