彭博独家:外资借ETF调仓规避美股股息税
A $40 Billion ETF Shuffle Helps Foreigners Dodge US Taxes | Bloomberg Businessweek
揭示了跨境资金利用ETF机制进行税务优化的具体路径与规模,对理解机构资金流向有参考价值。
Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts, radio news.
彭博音频工作室播客、广播新闻。
You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Tim Stenc on Bloomberg Radio. It is today's big take. It's one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg terminal. It is a Bloomberg exclusive. I'm just going to read the beginning of it because I think this does a very good job of describing what exactly is going on in this intricate world of ETFs with different letters. Every 3 months, like clockwork, investors pull $40 billion or more from Black Rockck ETF that tracks the S&P 500, deposit most of it into a near identical Vanguard product.
您正在收听由卡罗尔·马瑟(Carol Masser)和蒂姆·斯滕克(Tim Stenc)主持的彭博商业周刊,节目来自彭博电台。这是今天的重磅观点。它是彭博终端上阅读量最大的报道之一,也是彭博独家新闻。我只读一下开头部分,因为我认为它非常准确地描述了在这个错综复杂、带有不同字母后缀的ETF世界中所发生的一切。每三个月,就像钟表一样准时,投资者会从追踪标普500指数的贝莱德(BlackRock)ETF中撤出400亿美元或更多资金,并将大部分资金存入几乎相同的先锋集团(Vanguard)产品。
A few days later, they reverse the trade and the money flows back the other way. We are talking about VO and IVV. Those are the tickers. The Black Shares, Black Rockck eyesshares, core S&P 500 ETF and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. On the buy line, Zach MIT a reporter for Bloomberg News. Also with us, Denita Seikova, cross asset reporter for Bloomberg News. They both join us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.
几天后,他们逆转交易,资金又反向流动。我们说的是VO和IVV,这些是股票代码。分别是贝莱德核心标普500 ETF(BlackRock iShares Core S&P 500 ETF)和先锋标普500 ETF(Vanguard S&P 500 ETF)。连线彭博新闻社记者扎克·米特(Zach Mitsa),以及彭博新闻社跨资产记者德尼察·塞科娃(Denita Seikova)。他们都在彭博Interactive Brokers演播室与我们一起参与节目。
It's all about taxes, Zach. How do why what are they avoiding here and who are who is moving this money?
这一切都与税收有关,扎克。他们在这里避免的是什么?是谁在转移这笔资金?
Right? So there's this massive movement in the market. People are going into going out of one position into another one and then back. The reason is these are foreign investors who want to avoid tax on the dividend. So just before the date when they would be owning that ETF would entitle them to the dividend, they sell it. They buy an almost identical ETF, hold it for a couple days, and then sell that one and go back to the one they were in before.
没错。因此市场上出现了大规模的资金流动。人们从一种头寸进出到另一种头寸,然后再回来。原因是这些外国投资者希望避免股息税。所以在他们持有该ETF从而有权获得股息之前的日期临近时,他们会卖出。然后买入一个几乎相同的ETF,持有一两天,再卖出那个,回到之前持有的那只。
Does it only happen in a month where there are gains?
这种情况是否只发生在有收益的月份?
It it happens right around the dividend date, which is four times a year. Okay. So, every quarter on a certain predictable date is is the date when you owning the ETF gives you the right to get that dividend. They don't want the dividend, so they just sell before and then switch into something else. and then buy after. It's very It's very clean.
它发生在股息发放日附近,一年四次。好的。所以每个季度在一个可预测的特定日期,持有该ETF就赋予你获得该股息的权利。他们不想要股息,所以就在之前卖出,然后切换到其他产品,之后再买回。整个过程非常干净利落。
Well, you really put into perspective because in the article you say the pattern is so big that it stands out in the $16 trillion US ETF market. Uh Denise, I wonder how long has this been going on?
你把这个问题看得很透彻,因为在文章中你说这种模式规模巨大,在美国16万亿美元的ETF市场中格外显眼。丹尼斯(Denise),我想知道这种现象持续多久了?
We started noticing around September 2024, but you can see especially in the past year, it's been more and more evident. We're talking about billions moving out of those ETFs. These are two of the most liquid ETFs in the world. We're talking about VU which is a 1 trillion with a with a T dollar ETF. So we're these are big moves. What we're seeing is that there are more vehicles involved into the trade. Uh we're talking about VU and IVV but there is a state street product that we're seeing similar flows that pretty much emerged in the past 3 to 6 months or so.
我们大约在2024年9月开始注意到这一现象,但在过去一年中,这种趋势变得愈发明显。我们谈论的是数十亿美元从这些ETF中流出。这是全球流动性最强的两只ETF之一。我们说的是VU,这是一只规模达1万亿美元的ETF。因此,这些都是大幅度的资金流动。我们看到的是,参与交易的工具越来越多。我们提到的是VU和IVV,但我们也观察到State Street的一款产品出现了类似的资金流向,这主要出现在过去的3到6个月左右。
So there are more and more products that are part of this and a lot of those firms are making changes. uh for example, State Street changed its dividend date and one of the reasons they do that uh is they said to make switching between their own funds easier. Uh so obviously there is the tax benefit for the people doing the trade but those big organizations are getting massive flows coming in and sometimes out uh around this and we saw state street we also see a similar treasury ETF as golf from black rockck that is seeing so it's a small ecosystem of products that are shaping around those products
因此,越来越多的产品参与其中,许多公司都在做出调整。例如,State Street改变了其分红日期,他们表示这样做的原因之一是为了方便投资者在其自有基金之间切换。显然,对于进行交易的人来说存在税收优惠,但这些大型机构正因此获得巨大的资金流入和流出。我们在State Street看到了这一点,同时也看到贝莱德(BlackRock)的类似国债ETF Golf也呈现出相似的情况,这是一个围绕这些产品形成的小型生态系统。
yeah denita knows a thing or two about ETFs guys so if you want more ETFs just follow Danita Zach when I when I read this story and I think about your own reporting history. I I think back to your Pulit surprise 2015. You wrote about inversions and US companies dodging taxes. Right now you're writing about foreign investors dodging US taxes. Are there any similarities or is there a through line here?
是的,Denita对ETF非常了解,各位如果想了解更多关于ETF的信息,请关注Danita Zach。当我读到这个故事并回顾你自己的报道历史时,我想起了你2015年获得的普利策惊喜奖。你当时撰写了关于美国公司通过倒置结构避税的文章。而现在你正在撰写关于外国投资者规避美国税收的内容。这两者之间有相似之处吗?或者这里是否存在一条贯穿始终的主线?
Uh wow that's a great question. I I don't really know. I mean one one important difference is that uh the government was very unhappy with the uh corporate um tax avoidance that we wrote about a long time ago uh in where companies would renounce their US citizenship as it were to avoid to avoid paying US taxes. Here um the government has kind of said this one's okay. Um it's it's basically just you're allowed to buy and sell stock whenever you want to.
哇,这是个很好的问题。我真的不太确定。我的意思是,一个重要的区别是,政府对我们很久以前报道过的企业避税行为非常不满,当时一些公司通过放弃其美国公民身份等方式来避免缴纳美国税款。而在这里,政府某种程度上表示这种情况是可以接受的。基本上,这只是允许人们随时买卖股票而已。
And here um the the the foreign investors are simply selling one stock and then buying another and going back. So unlike previous versions of this dividend avoidance that involved uh kind of a product that a bank would sell that involved a swap or something, those were attacked by the IRS and Treasury. Here um it looks like the government is is uh doesn't see this as an abuse. Do we do then the question for either of you do we do we know how much over the last few years has been avoided in taxes by this happening?
那么,这里的海外投资者只是简单地卖出一种股票,然后买入另一种股票,再循环往复。因此,与以往涉及银行出售的某种产品(包含互换交易等)的股息规避方式不同,那些方式曾遭到美国国税局(IRS)和财政部的打击。而在这里,政府似乎并不认为这是一种滥用行为。那么,我想请问二位:我们是否知道在过去几年中,通过这种方式避免了多少税款?
Yeah. So the um compared to the size of all the trading it's actually quite tiny. We calculated maybe 147 million just in last in the last um in 2025. That's but in order to achieve that, you had to move $40 billion in and out of these uh these um these uh ETFs four different times just to achieve that that relatively modest tax savings.
是的。因此,相较于所有交易的规模,这实际上非常微小。我们计算出仅在2025年,这一数额可能仅为1.47亿美元。但为了获得这笔相对 modest(适度)的税收节省,你必须将400亿美元进出这些ETF四次。
How did this get on your radar in the first place? That's my question. So, a couple years, a couple months ago, uh, uh, Denisa and I and another colleague were kind of looking at these flows. Um, and we're just kind of mystified by why they were so large because you can see if you just look at how much is is in IVV, um, it just goes up and down a lot and it's very much like clockwork every quarter. And, uh, so we just started asking around and, uh, people gave us the answer eventually.
这最初是如何进入你们视野的?这是我的问题。所以,大约几个月前,Denisa、我和另一位同事正在观察这些资金流向。我们对它们为何如此庞大感到困惑,因为如果你只看IVV中的资金量,它波动很大,而且每个季度都像时钟一样规律。于是我们开始四处打听,最终人们给出了答案。
You know what's fascinating that if you ask anyone in the ETF industry, they say we've seen the flows. They don't necessarily know what it is, but when when you look at the X dividend day, X dividend date and we see this flow, it says, oh, it all makes sense. Um, so definitely it's been growing bigger and bigger. We wrote about some of the institutional players uh who are taking part of it and we have some reporting uh that people familiar see that Marshall waste which is obviously a massive British hedge fund uh is one of the players involved into this trade and more generally one of the trades we're looking at is the cash and carry trade which is a very popular institutional trade as funds have been rising and a lot of pension funds endowments are really interested in the trade.
你知道有趣的是,如果你询问ETF行业的任何人,他们都说看到了这些资金流向。他们不一定知道具体是什么,但当你查看X除息日或X除息日期并看到这种资金流动时,就会恍然大悟,一切都说得通了。因此,这种情况肯定越来越大。我们报道过一些参与其中的机构投资者,我们有消息人士透露,显然庞大的英国对冲基金Marshall Wace是参与这项交易的玩家之一。更广泛地说,我们正在研究的一种交易是现金与持有套利(cash and carry trade),这是一种非常流行的机构交易,随着基金规模的扩大,许多养老基金和捐赠基金都对这项交易很感兴趣。
So obviously we uh mentioned just a few names in the stories but um here we have more of a kind of an institutional profile of the people that are doing those trades.
因此,显然我们在故事中只提到了少数名字,但这里我们更多地是对进行这些交易的机构进行了一种画像分析。
So I guess the question you know if it's not so much money that the government is losing as a result of this uh if it's a totally legal loophole that these companies are are are finding I'll put on my you know what my editor used to say to me all the time. Why should we care?
所以我想,问题不在于政府因此损失了多少资金,而在于这是否是一个完全合法的法律漏洞,这些公司正在利用它。我会用我编辑以前常对我说的话来回答:我们为什么要关心?
Yeah. So, I mean, I think part of what's interesting is just the the the massive nature of these transactions. Um, you know, some 40 or 50 billion dollars every quarter is kind of moving in and out. In fact,
是的。我的意思是,我认为有趣的部分在于这些交易的规模之大。你知道,每个季度有大约400亿到500亿美元的资金在进出。事实上,
I think a if I'm not wrong here, Denise, a couple quarters ago or maybe last quarter, there was a it actually caused
如果我没记错的话,Denise,几个季度前或者可能是上个季度,确实发生了一件
um you can tell the rest of the story.
嗯,你可以把剩下的故事讲完。
Yeah. because because obviously like those are the big S&P 500 funds and there is a constant competition of like who's the biggest. So there was a little competition between Black Rockck and Vanguard in terms of the biggest uh and those flows were so big and they're so predictable that they kind of ruined the the table of who's first and who's second because we're talking about billions moving all the time. So even for those companies it's kind of changing the leadership board.
是的。因为显然,这些都是标普500指数基金,而且存在一种持续的竞争,看谁规模最大。所以在最大规模方面,贝莱德(BlackRock)和先锋领航(Vanguard)之间有一点竞争。由于这些资金流动量巨大且可预测性很强,它们某种程度上扰乱了第一和第二名的排名,因为我们谈论的是数十亿美元一直在流动。因此,即使对这些公司来说,领导层的排名也在不断变化。
But on whether how important is that? It's very interesting cuz uh we attended the meeting with Treasury officials that flagged a couple tax aare trades and there is a similar trade that's packaged inside of a ETF that they do care about and they're worried about. There are a few different
但这有多重要呢?这非常有趣,因为我们参加了与美国财政部官员的会议,他们指出了几笔税务套利交易,而在ETF中打包进行的类似交易也是他们关心和担忧的。这里有几种不同的
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力