跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选72Bloomberg Television(YouTube)股市

Jain基金被Millennium收购:高成本致净收益仅8%

Jain's Fund to Manage Money Just for Millennium

原文
发到 X

Let's get more on this story, Isabelle, and bring in hedge fund reporter Hema Parmar. Hema, the details of how much money they made pre Millennium deal, what does that tell us about why they maybe even made the deal to begin with? Yes. So what this shows is really just how expensive it is to run a multistrat. They made $1,800,000,000 in trading profit, but that's before you take into account all the expenses. The 1.4 1,800,000,000 translates to about 41% gross returns on called capital.

让我们更深入地了解这个故事,伊莎贝尔,并邀请对冲基金记者赫玛·帕尔马。赫玛,关于他们在千禧年交易之前赚了多少钱的细节,这告诉我们什么?是的。所以这表明的是运营多策略基金的昂贵程度。他们在交易中赚了18亿美元,但这是在扣除所有费用之前的数字。14亿至18亿美元的收益相当于已调用资本的约41%的毛回报。

What that actually spells for investors when you take into account of all the expenses is really more like an 8% gain. So you see that spread between a 41% gross profit, gross return and that 8% net return. 8% is what investors are walking away with, and that just shows the incredible costs that are associated with launching a multistrat, which is incredibly complicated. This is not a traditional long shoot equity funds.

当你考虑到所有费用时,这对投资者来说实际上更像是8%的收益。所以你可以看到41%的毛利润、毛回报和8%的净回报之间的差距。8%是投资者最终得到的,这也显示了启动一个多策略基金所涉及的惊人成本,这是非常复杂的。这不是传统的长期股票基金。

So what does this tell you about the economics of the business? And this Millennium may be becoming the venture capital, the hedge fund world? It is. So, you know, Millennium is sitting in this interesting spot where they are both a hedge fund, and they're increasingly an allocator of capital. And so they've really spawned this movement to, invest in other third party hedge funds, a hedge fund investing in another hedge fund and seeding them with money.

那么这告诉你关于业务的经济状况如何?千禧年是否正在成为对冲基金世界的风险投资?确实如此。所以你知道,千禧年处于一个有趣的位置,它既是对冲基金,又越来越多地成为资本配置者。因此,他们催生了一种运动,即投资于其他第三方对冲基金,一个对冲基金投资于另一个对冲基金,并向其注入资金。

And what that means for that individual manager is you get consistent capital from one investor. You get to rely on the infrastructure you get from Millennium. Some of the, trading assistance or data or AI help or whatever you want, but it can it can increase, the capability of the fund to be a little bit more cost effective, but you have one investor. So if that investor pulls or if that investor changes their mind, you have a little bit more concentration risk.

这意味着对于单个基金经理来说,你会从一个投资者那里获得稳定的资本。你可以依赖从千禧年获得的设施。一些交易辅助或数据或AI帮助或其他任何东西,但这可以增加基金的能力,使其更具成本效益,但你只有一个投资者。所以如果那个投资者撤资或者改变主意,你就会有更多的集中风险。

That that's exactly what I wanted to ask about because one of the interesting and and albeit cutthroat features of the pod shop model is that if you do well, you get money. Mhmm. If you don't do well, lines are cut off. Do you do we know if that model stands for when it's an outside hedge fund? Are they is the money as fickle as it is within the pawnshops? Yes. So it can be. For some of these external managers, you do face the same sort of we call them risk controls, where if you lose five percent, your fund is cut down a little bit.

这正是我想问的,因为Pod Shop模式的一个有趣且残酷的特点是,如果你做得好,你就会得到钱。嗯哼。如果你做得不好,资金就会被切断。我们知道这个模式在外部对冲基金中是否适用吗?他们的资金像内部那样善变吗?是的。所以它可以。对于这些外部经理来说,你确实面临着所谓的风险控制,比如如果你损失了5%,你的基金就会被削减一点。

If you lose 7% and closer to 10%, you could be fired. And so if you are an external pod, you may face those same constraints. Bobby James Fund is less of an external pod as it is an external business, which is a really interesting movement we're seeing from Millennium, which is now incorporating whole businesses into your firm or maybe not incorporating, but using them as an external fund versus just one individual PM and his his business.

如果你亏损达到7%,接近10%,你可能会被解雇。因此,如果你是外部pod(独立团队),你可能面临同样的约束。Bobby James Fund与其说是一个外部pod,不如说是一个外部业务,这是我们在Millennium看到的一个非常有趣的动向,即现在将整家业务纳入你的公司,或者可能不纳入,而是将其作为一只外部基金来运作,而不仅仅是一个个人基金经理及其个人业务。

So, Bobby James firm has seven different business lines, has 400 employees. It's a ginormous firm to integrate in some way even though it runs independently to, involve it with Millennium. It's a fascinating model that we're seeing take place in this industry at this point in time. How is it viewed in the industry? Is it more about is it more like Jane waving a white flag, or are they both viewed as winners and this is a great deal?

所以,Bobby James公司拥有七条不同的业务线,拥有400名员工。尽管它以独立方式运营,但要以任何方式将其整合进Millennium,这都是一家庞大的公司。这是一个令人着迷的模式,我们看到它在这个行业的当前阶段正在发生。业界如何看待这一情况?是更像Jane挥舞白旗投降,还是双方都被视为赢家,这是一笔很好的交易?

Is it mutually exclusive? Or I'm I'm just curious how it's viewed. No. So it's it's fascinating because on one side, you know, Bobby was able to produce decent returns on the gross side of things. But because costs were such an impediment, he would then had to rely on Millennium as, like, an opportunity to keep going. And so I think a lot of people did view that as, like, showing just how difficult it is to launch a hedge fund, especially Bobby's idea was to launch a multi shot all at once, fully formed with all the different parts.

这是互斥的吗?或者我只是好奇业界如何看待这件事。不。所以这很有趣,因为一方面,你知道,Bobby在毛收益方面能够产生不错的回报。但由于成本成为如此大的障碍,他不得不依赖Millennium,将其视为继续发展的机会。因此,我认为许多人确实将此视为展示了创办对冲基金的困难程度,尤其是Bobby的想法是一次性推出一个多策略、完全成型且包含所有不同部分的产品。

And his thesis was in doing that, all the parts talk to each other. You can better then set up the firm to be optimized in that way. But part of the struggle with that is then you have to, get all the talent in place, make sure you can deploy the money in a quicker fashion, but it took them twenty months to deploy the capital, and that's, a bit of a lag on returns too. So it's viewed also as him sort of coming back home because he came from Millennium.

他的论点在于,通过这样做,各个部分可以相互沟通。你可以更好地以这种方式优化公司的设置。但其中的挑战之一是,你必须到位所有人才,确保你能更快地部署资金,但他们花了二十个月才部署资本,这也导致回报有所滞后。因此,这也被视为他某种程度上回归家园,因为他来自Millennium。

He's now coming back home to Millennium. I think it can be viewed as a smart way to keep the business going in the environment that we're in. It's a bit it's a complicated matter. Definitely complicated. And it's such a cutthroat industry. Hema. Thank you for keeping us updated with all things hedge fund.

他现在正回到Millennium这个“家”。我认为在我们所处的环境中,可以将其视为保持业务持续运营的一种聪明方式。这有点……这是一个复杂的问题。绝对复杂。而且这是一个如此残酷的行业。Hema。感谢您一直向我们更新对冲基金的所有动态。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

另一事件,读法相近