纽约州长谈AI监管、数据中心禁令与Meta和解
New York Governor Kathy Hochul thinks AI should be ‘less evil’
Today, I’m talking with New York Governor Kathy Hochul, and I’ll just warn you — this episode moves really fast. It’s an election year, after all, with a shocking amount of tech policy at stake, and Governor Hochul has taken strong positions on almost every major tech issue there is.
今天,我与纽约州州长凯西·霍赫尔(Kathy Hochul)进行对话。我先提醒一下——这期节目节奏非常快。毕竟这是选举年,涉及大量科技政策问题,而霍赫尔州长几乎在所有重大科技议题上都采取了强硬立场。
For example, Meta just reached a settlement with dozens of states, including New York, which will restrict how teens use platforms like Instagram in very specific ways. Governor Hochul is a strong supporter of those restrictions and more, as you’ll hear. But those come with a cost — widespread age verification means adults will also have to show ID to use the internet, which will essentially make it impossible to be anonymous online.
例如,Meta 刚刚与包括纽约在内的数十个州达成和解,将以非常具体的方式限制青少年使用 Instagram 等平台的使用方式。正如你将在节目中听到的那样,霍赫尔州长是这些限制措施以及更多措施的坚定支持者。但这些措施也有代价——广泛的年龄验证意味着成年人也将必须出示身份证件才能使用互联网,这在本质上将使在线匿名变得不可能。
Verge subscribers, don’t forget you get exclusive access to ad-free Decoder wherever you get your podcasts. Head here. Not a subscriber? You can sign up here.
Verge 的订阅用户别忘了,你可以在收听播客的任何地方获得无广告的 Decoder 独家访问权限。点击这里。还不是订阅用户?你可以在这里注册。
So I asked about that, and if these new restrictions amount to Meta conceding in a lawsuit that these kinds of regulations on speech might not pass First Amendment scrutiny if the governor were to try and impose them in a law.
因此我对此进行了询问,并想知道这些新限制是否意味着 Meta 在一场诉讼中承认,如果州长试图通过法律实施此类言论监管,这类规定可能无法通过第一修正案(First Amendment)的审查。
I had similar questions about New York’s restrictions on ghost guns, which prevent 3D printers from printing gun parts. That law is already being challenged — not in courts, but by activists like Cody Wilson, who runs the largest database of 3D-printable gun files and who has started altering those files in a process he calls “Hochulization” in order to show the ban is technically toothless. I asked the governor about this, and, well, you’ll hear her challenge Cody right back.
我对纽约州关于幽灵枪(ghost guns)的限制也提出了类似的问题,该禁令禁止 3D 打印机打印枪支部件。这项法律已经遭到挑战——不是在法庭上,而是由像 Cody Wilson 这样的活动人士发起的,他运营着最大的可 3D 打印枪支文件数据库,并且已经开始修改这些文件,进行他称为“霍赫尔化”(Hochulization)的过程,以证明该禁令在技术上毫无效力。我问了州长这件事,嗯,你将在节目中听到她如何反过来挑战 Cody。
Oh, but there’s more: We also talked about surveillance and Flock cameras, and, of course, the politics of AI and data centers in an election year. Governor Hochul signed a one-year moratorium on data center construction in July, and I wanted to know what she’s looking for when that expires to make data centers a workable proposition.
哦,还有更多内容:我们还讨论了监控和 Flock 摄像头,当然还有选举年中人工智能和数据中心的政治问题。霍赫尔州长今年七月签署了一项为期一年的数据中心建设暂停令,我想知道当该禁令到期时,她在寻找什么条件以使数据中心成为一个可行的方案。
We also talked a little about Mayor Zohran Mamdani in New York City and of course, her org chart for the state government. This one is a lot, I think you’re going to like it.
我们还稍微谈到了纽约市市长佐兰·马姆达尼(Zohran Mamdani),当然还有她的州政府组织架构图。内容很多,我想你会喜欢的。
Okay: New York Governor Kathy Hochul, here we go.
好的:纽约州州长凯西·霍赫尔,我们开始吧。
This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
本次采访已根据篇幅和清晰度进行了轻微编辑。
Governor Kathy Hochul, you are the governor of the state of New York! Welcome to Decoder.
凯西·霍赫尔州长,你是纽约州的州长!欢迎来到 Decoder。
Thank you. Happy to be on.
谢谢。很高兴来到这里。
I have so much to talk to you about. We don’t have a ton of time, so we’re going to move fast. Are you up for it?
我有太多想和你聊的话题了。我们没有太多时间,所以我们要加快节奏。你准备好了吗?
I’m up.
我准备好了。
All right. I want to start with what I call the Decoder questions, lightning round style. I think the operation of your office and state government is really opaque to most people. So I ask everybody this question. How is the governor’s office structured? How did you make decisions about how to structure that office? How did you organize it?
好的。我想从我称之为“解码器问题”的闪电问答环节开始。我认为,大多数人对你们州政府和州政府办公室的运作方式非常不了解。所以我向每个人提出这个问题:州长办公室是如何架构的?你们是如何决定该办公室的组织结构的?你们又是如何组织它的?
Governor at the top. Then there’s a leadership team, senior leadership team. There’s a secretary to the governor who is the top advisor. It sounds like the person taking notes at meetings, but the secretary of the governor is the most powerful non-elected position in the state. When I first became governor five years ago, I said, “I want the smartest, the best, the brightest people I could surround myself with.” I didn’t know a lot of these individuals, but they were highly recommended from having business experience, government experience, or technological experience. I said, “Bring me the smartest.”
州长位于顶层。然后是一个领导团队,即高级领导团队。有一位州长秘书,他是最高级别的顾问。听起来像是会议中负责记录的人,但州长秘书是州内权力最大的非民选职位。五年前我刚成为州长时,我说:“我要让最聪明、最优秀、最杰出的人围绕在我身边。”我并不认识其中的许多人,但他们因拥有商业经验、政府经验或技术经验而受到高度推荐。我说:“给我找来最聪明的人。”
There’s a layer of senior team members. There’s one individual who oversees all the agencies. There are 45 different agencies for everything from the Department of Transportation to the environment to our housing development agency, economic development. It all trickles down to a pretty large bureaucracy. I’m the decision maker, but I take input from a lot of different levels of government before I make a final decision. But I’m a fairly quick decision-maker. Show me the facts and I can make a decision instantaneously.
还有一层高级团队成员。其中有一位负责人监督所有机构。共有45个不同的机构,涵盖从交通部到环境部门,再到我们的住房发展机构和经济发展机构等各个领域。这一切最终汇聚成一个相当庞大的官僚体系。我是决策者,但在做出最终决定之前,我会听取来自政府各个层面的意见。不过,我是一个相当快速的决策者。把事实摆在我面前,我就能瞬间做出决定。
You took over in a complicated way from your predecessor and then you won reelection. Did you sit down and make an org chart of how you wanted your office to work?
你是以一种复杂的方式从前任手中接管的,随后又赢得了连任。你是否坐下来绘制了一张你希望办公室如何运作的组织架构图?
Yes, I did.
是的,我做了。
How long did that take?
这花了多长时间?
I inherited one in a sense, but also early on I didn’t have a lot of tools. In fact, we had a hurricane in my first week. I didn’t know how to declare a disaster. I hadn’t hired that person yet, the head of emergency services. We were caught off-guard a little bit. The state still functioned, but I knew I needed to do more.
从某种意义上说,我继承了一个现成的架构,但起初我的工具并不多。事实上,在我上任的第一周就遭遇了飓风。我当时还不知道如何宣布灾难状态。我也还没有雇用那个人,即应急服务部门的负责人。我们有点措手不及。州政府仍然在运转,但我意识到我需要做更多工作。
I’m always in search of talent, smart people, and trying to rotate people in. Sometimes I start commissions like the Future Works Commission to bring in experts, not just from my administration but around the country, who understand the displacement of jobs because of AI: who’s most vulnerable, how we deal with that, and how we train people to be able to overcome those obstacles or to embrace AI as a possible career. I’m always finding ways to supplement my team with industry- or issue-specific experts.
我总是在寻找人才、聪明人,并尝试轮换人员。有时我会启动像“未来工作委员会”这样的委托项目,以引入专家,不仅来自我的管理团队,还包括全国各地的专家,他们了解因人工智能导致的岗位流失:谁最脆弱,我们如何应对,以及如何培训人们克服这些障碍或将人工智能作为一种可能的职业来拥抱。我总是寻找方法用行业或问题特定的专家来补充我的团队。
This question’s going to sound ridiculous, but I’ve asked a lot of people a variation of this question. Almost no one ever is going to sit down and say, “I need to write a new org chart for the governor’s office of New York.” Did you do that on a whiteboard? Did you open PowerPoint? Was it just you alone with a laptop? What was it actually like?
这个问题听起来可能很荒谬,但我已经问过很多人这个问题的变体。几乎没有人会坐下来写一份新的纽约州长办公室的组织架构图。你是在白板上做的吗?还是打开了 PowerPoint?还是只有你一个人对着笔记本电脑?实际上是什么样的?
Can I tell you something I’m embarrassed of, since you phrased it that way? I did it on a legal pad.
既然你这么问,我可以告诉你一件让我感到尴尬的事吗?我是在法律记事本上做的。
Nice.
不错。
Old school. Sorry.
老派风格。抱歉。
Yeah, pen and paper. No, it’s great. Very few people do that. You would be surprised at some of the answers we’ve gotten to questions like that.
是的,笔和纸。不,这很好。很少有人这样做。你会对我们收到的类似问题的答案感到惊讶。
I just laid out, “This is what I need, this is the team I need.” Now that was five years ago. I’ve gotten a little better. I’d probably ask Claude or ChatGPT for some recommendations.
我只是列出了:“这就是我需要的,这是我需要的团队。”那是五年前的事了。我现在做得更好了。我可能会向 Claude 或 ChatGPT 寻求一些建议。
Oh boy. We’re going to come to that. Don’t worry about it. You started answering this question, but this is the other Decoder question. How do you make decisions? What’s your framework?
哦,天哪。我们会谈到那一点的。别担心。你已经开始回答这个问题了,但这是另一个解码器问题。你是如何做决策的?你的框架是什么?
Bring in all the information as quickly as possible, pressure-test it, and then go with my gut.
尽可能快地收集所有信息,对其进行压力测试,然后跟随我的直觉。
One of the more unique parts about structure in New York government is the relationship between the state and the city. We’re talking here in person in New York City. Mayor Zohran Mamdani has been pretty aggressive about going after billionaires and tech companies. Most recently the city went after Amazon for its labor practices. Do you think that’s been effective here?
纽约政府结构中比较独特的一部分是州与城市之间的关系。我们在这里面对面交谈,在纽约市。市长佐兰·曼达尼(Zohran Mamdani)在对准亿万富翁和科技公司方面相当激进。最近,该市针对亚马逊的劳工做法进行了行动。你认为这在当地有效吗?
I need to make sure that New York City and the state overall continue to be a place where we support innovation, new jobs. Technology is leading the forefront right now. I’m really proud that we now have been named the number-one job creator for tech jobs in the country, surpassing California, which has always dominated in this space. That says something about our ecosystem and I want to foster that. I want people who have just an idea who can use technology to create something that no one else had ever conceived of and be successful in marketing it. That is what I’m leaning hard into.
我必须确保纽约市和整个州继续成为我们支持创新、创造新就业岗位的地方。如今,科技正引领前沿。我深感自豪的是,我们现在已被评为全美科技岗位的第一大创造者,超越了在这个领域一直占据主导地位的加州。这说明了我们的生态系统具有某种优势,我希望培育这种优势。我希望那些仅凭一个想法的人能够利用技术创造出前所未有的事物,并在市场推广中取得成功。这正是我大力推动的方向。
The mayor has his own approach, but I think overall we both want New York City to succeed. To me, success also means creating more opportunities for jobs because of the spinoff effect. Five guys in an office right in this building could lead to 500 jobs in a couple of years. Those opportunities help lift people out of their circumstances and achieve what I’m hoping for is more opportunity for more people.
市长有他自己的方法,但我认为总体而言,我们都希望纽约市取得成功。对我来说,成功也意味着通过溢出效应创造更多的就业机会。在这栋大楼里,办公室中的五个人可能在几年内带来500个就业岗位。这些机会帮助人们摆脱困境,实现我所期望的——为更多人提供更多机会。
There’s a WeWork just above us. We got to go find those five guys.
我们楼上就有一家WeWork。我们必须去找到那五个人。
I’m asking specifically about the more aggressive approach the mayor has taken. He’s taken a very aggressive approach. And like you said, the numbers show that the billionaires didn’t run, they’re actually investing; the tech companies didn’t run, they’re actually hiring at a rate that surpasses San Francisco. Is that emboldening you to take a harsher regulatory approach to tech companies?
我特别想问的是市长采取的更为激进的方法。他确实采取了非常激进的举措。正如你所说,数据显示亿万富翁们并没有逃离,他们实际上在进行投资;科技公司也没有撤离,它们的招聘率甚至超过了旧金山。这是否让你更有底气对科技公司采取更严厉的监管措施?
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力