Circle 2025 财报与 KelpDAO 攻击:利率敏感性与 DeFi
Circle Scenario Analysis and KelpDAO's DeFi Liquidity Shock
对 Circle 的利率敏感性、Coinbase 分成协议及 KelpDAO 攻击引发的 DeFi 流动性冲击进行了系统性分析,提供了可复用的情景矩阵和关键数据,适合关注稳定币与 DeFi 风险的投资者深入研究。
Get the best data-driven crypto insights and analysis every week:
Subscribe now
Circle Scenario Analysis and KelpDAO’s DeFi Liquidity Shock
By: Tanay Ved, Senior Research Associate
Key Takeaways
- Circle’s $2.7B in FY2025 revenue was almost entirely driven by interest on USDC reserves, making the interest rate path, USDC supply growth and August 2026 Coinbase renewal key variables for its earnings outlook.
- USDC is increasingly being used, not just held: adjusted transfer volumes grew ~320% YoY in 2025, with early traction in Circle Payments Network, CCTP, and subscriptions forming a fee-based layer alongside the reserve income foundation.
- A ~$290M exploit of KelpDAO’s rsETH bridge rippled into a broader DeFi liquidity shock as unbacked rsETH was used to borrow WETH on Aave, draining liquidity and sparking a wider “bank‑run” across affected DeFi markets.
Introduction
It’s been almost a year since Circle (CRCL) went public on the NYSE. Shares quickly ballooned from a $31 IPO price on June 5th to over $280, taking the stablecoin issuer to a peak market cap of roughly $70B.
Since then, however, the stock has round‑tripped from its lofty valuation, trading closer to $103 at a current market value of about $26B. As the post‑IPO momentum phase has settled, more focus has shifted to the fundamentals of Circle’s business model and whether to view it as a reserve‑income business or as a broader payments and infrastructure platform.
In this State of the Network, we take a closer look at the key forces shaping those fundamentals going ahead, building on our previous analysis of Circle’s IPO and USDC economics. We examine Circle’s sensitivity to interest rates, the evolution of the USDC economics with Coinbase, potential yield restrictions under the CLARITY Act, and Circle’s ability to grow other fee and subscription revenues beyond reserve income.
Circle Business Model & 2025 Financials
Circle’s business model today is largely driven by four levers:
- USDC circulating supply
- Effective yields on USDC reserve assets
- Circle’s take‑rate on USDC reserve income (after distribution to partners like Coinbase)
- Subscription, services, and other fee revenue
In FY 2025, Circle generated about $2.7B in total revenue and reserve income, up 64% YoY. This was boosted by USDC’s market cap reaching $75.3B by year end, maintaining a stablecoin market share of ~28% and 320% YoY growth in transaction volumes, implying higher velocity.
Source: Coin Metrics Network Data Pro
Reserve income tied to USDC balances and rates remained the dominant source of revenue ($2.64B, 96%) while subscription, services, and other fees grew from a smaller base but started to contribute more visibly to the top line ($110M).
Distribution, transaction, and other costs were $461M in Q4, reflecting the economics shared with partners for USDC distribution and usage. After those costs, Revenue Less Distribution Costs (RLDC) came in at $1.08B, for a full-year RLDC margin of 39%, a useful way to think about what Circle actually keeps from USDC economics before operating expenses.
Source: Circle Q4 2025 Earnings
The company’s near-term financial profile therefore remains driven mainly by USDC in circulation, reserve income, and the economics of revenue-sharing arrangements, particularly with Coinbase. In the sections ahead, we model how shifts in these levers could affect Circle’s financials and revenue profile.
Circle Scenario Analysis
Interest Rate Sensitivity
With roughly 96% of FY 2025 revenue coming from reserve income, Circle’s earnings power today is a function of short‑term interest rates on USDC reserves. Estimates based on Circle’s guidance suggest that a 100 basis point cut in rates would reduce annual revenue by roughly 25–30%, implying a close relationship between interest rates and Circle’s top line. Against Fed projections and futures that put the funds rate in roughly the 3–3.75% range through 2026–27, the key question is how much USDC growth can offset the drag from lower yields.
To illustrate this, we lay out a simple matrix of scenarios. Each cell shows an estimate of annualized reserve income at different combinations of effective reserve yield and USDC circulating supply, using FY 2025’s ~$2.7B at a 4.1% yield and ~$65B average supply as the baseline.
Circle Reserve Income Matrix:
Source: Coin Metrics Network Data Pro
At the high end of rate expectations (~4–4.5%), reserve income can grow from the 2025 base, with supply in the $90–110B range pushing reserve income well above $4B. Around 3–3.5%, roughly where the Fed’s 2026–27 projections and futures cluster, moderate USDC growth from the current ~$75B level can keep reserve income roughly flat to slightly higher versus FY 2025.
In a deeper easing scenario with effective yields closer to 2.5%, even very strong USDC growth only partially offsets lower rates, and reserve income could end up roughly 30–50% below what a higher‑for‑longer path would have delivered for a similar supply base.
Coinbase Revenue Sharing & Distribution
Circle’s economics are also heavily shaped by distribution arrangements, particularly with partners like Coinbase. Under the current agreement, Coinbase receives all of the interest on USDC held on its platform and 50% of the interest on USDC held elsewhere, in exchange for driving USDC distribution and demand through its products and user base.
Source: Coinbase Q4 2025 Shareholder Letter
In FY 2025, while Circle reported $2.63B in reserve income, roughly $1.35B (about 51% of gross reserve income) flowed to Coinbase under this revenue sharing structure. As a result, Circle’s revenue less distribution costs (RLDC) came in at $1.08B, leaving a 39% margin. This makes the Circle‑Coinbase relationship both strategic and economic: Coinbase is simultaneously one of the largest demand and distribution channels for USDC and a major beneficiary of USDC’s reserve income.
With this revenue‑sharing agreement up for renewal in August 2026, small changes in Circle’s take‑rate on USDC reserve income could compound with the rate and supply scenarios above. Using FY 2025 as a base, we can summarize the impact of different distribution outcomes as follows:
In the improved economics case, renewal terms and distribution diversification push costs down, raising Circle’s take‑rate and RLDC margins. The FY 2025 realized reflects where we are today, where Circle keeps roughly $0.37 of each dollar of reserve income and remains dependent on elevated rates and a ~$75B USDC base. The worsened economics case is a risk scenario in which Coinbase and other partners capture a larger share of USDC reserve income, pushing RLDC margins lower and leaving CRCL more exposed to any combination of lower yields and weaker USDC growth.
Other Revenue Streams & Potential Risks
Beyond reserve income and distribution costs, a handful of emerging factors will shape Circle’s longer-term revenue profile and competitive positioning. Other Revenue, which includes subscription and services fees, transaction revenue, and validator income, grew from just $15M in FY2024 to $110M in FY2025, and is guided to $150–170M in FY2026. At roughly 4% of total revenue today, it remains small, but its trajectory matters for how the market eventually values Circle. Key factors to watch include:
- CLARITY Act Yield prohibition: A draft provision in the CLARITY Act would prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying yield directly to holders, instead allowing “activity-based rewards”. This is a nuanced risk for Circle as the yield from USDC is not paid out to holders, so it may not directly impair Circle’s model and help them retain interest income. The indirect risk is Coinbase’s ability to attract USDC balances through its own yield-sharing programs becoming constrained, which could shift the on-platform/off-platform mix in ways that affect Circle’s distribution costs and overall USDC demand.
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力