好文化是最大生产力,而非AI
Good Culture is the Biggest Productivity Hack, Not AI
良好文化是最大的生产力提升手段,而非AI
AI definitely helps with productivity, but only when you have the right culture in place first!
AI确实有助于提高生产力,但前提是你首先拥有合适的文化!
Gregor Ojstersek
格雷戈尔·奥伊斯特塞克
Aug 24, 2026
2026年8月24日
78
78
6
6
18
18
Share
分享
This newsletter is sponsored by Unblocked.
本通讯由Unblocked赞助。
[Webinar] How to stop babysitting your agents
[网络研讨会] 如何停止对代理的过度监督
Agents can generate code. Getting it right for your system, team conventions, and past decisions is the hard part. You end up wasting time and tokens in the correction loops.
代理可以生成代码。但要让代码符合你的系统、团队规范和过去的决策,这才是难点。你最终会在纠正循环中浪费时间和令牌。
More MCPs, rules, and bigger context windows give agents access to information, but not understanding. The teams pulling ahead have a context layer to give agents exactly what they need for the task at hand.
更多的MCP、规则和更大的上下文窗口让代理能够访问信息,但无法理解。领先的团队拥有一个上下文层,为代理提供手头任务所需的确切信息。
Join live on Sep 2 (FREE) to see:
9月2日在线参加(免费)以了解:
- Where teams get stuck on the AI maturity curve and why common fixes fall short
- How a context layer solves for quality, efficiency, and cost
- Live demo: the same coding task with and without a context layer
- 团队在AI成熟度曲线上卡住的地方以及常见修复为何效果不佳
- 上下文层如何解决质量、效率和成本问题
- 现场演示:有和没有上下文层的相同编码任务
Register now
立即注册
Thanks to Unblocked for sponsoring this newsletter. Let’s get back to today’s thought!
感谢Unblocked赞助本期通讯。让我们回到今天的思考!
Intro
引言
This is something that has been on my mind for quite a while now. It seems like everything these days revolves around “AI”, “AI tools”, “AI productivity”.
这是我思考已久的问题。如今似乎一切都围绕着“AI”、“AI工具”、“AI生产力”展开。
- “You need to use this AI tool”
- “You need to be using this AI workflow”
- “Your engineers should be 2x, 5x, or even 10x more productive with AI”
- “你需要使用这个AI工具”
- “你需要使用这个AI工作流程”
- “你的工程师应该通过AI提高2倍、5倍甚至10倍的生产力”
And I get it. AI is changing how we build software, and I use AI tools myself every day as well.
我理解这一点。AI正在改变我们构建软件的方式,我自己也每天使用AI工具。
But we’re focusing too much on AI tools alone and not enough on the environment in which the tools are being used. Because there’s something a LOT more important than AI tools, and that’s a great culture.
但我们过于关注AI工具本身,而没有足够关注使用这些工具的环境。因为有比AI工具重要得多的东西,那就是良好的文化。
Throughout my 13+ year career in the engineering industry, I’ve seen both the negative effects of bad culture and the positive effects of a good one. I even felt it myself as an engineer and an engineering manager, when departments spent whole days blaming each other for problems.
在我13年以上的工程行业职业生涯中,我既看到了不良文化的负面影响,也看到了良好文化的积极影响。作为工程师和工程经理,我甚至亲身经历过部门之间整天互相指责问题的情况。
So, I am a big believer that everything starts with a good culture, and I’ll tell you all about it in this article.
因此,我坚信一切始于良好的文化,我将在本文中详细阐述这一点。
Let’s start!
让我们开始吧!
"This is very easy to build now that we have AI, and we don't need as many people"
“有了AI,现在建这个很容易,我们不需要那么多人了”
This is a sentence that breaks a good culture and makes people believe that their job is not important. Especially if it comes from an executive, e.g., a CEO, CPO, or even worse, a CTO.
这句话会破坏良好的文化,让人觉得自己工作不重要。尤其如果出自高管之口,比如CEO、CPO,甚至更糟的是CTO。
The problem with it is that it totally decreases psychological safety, and everyone starts wondering whether they'll still be needed or not.
问题在于它完全降低了心理安全感,每个人都开始怀疑自己是否还会被需要。
But here is an important thing that many people forget:
但这里有一个很多人忘记的重要事情:
There is no better productivity hack than a great culture. No AI tools will provide bigger productivity gains.
没有比良好文化更好的生产力提升技巧。没有任何AI工具能带来更大的生产力提升。
I’ve unfortunately seen and heard this sentence quite a few times, either directly or from an engineer or engineering leader who has reported that to me.
不幸的是,我多次听到或看到这句话,无论是直接听到,还是从工程师或工程领导那里报告给我。
I think things have gotten a bit better this year, but in 2025 and in early 2026, I heard this many times.
我觉得今年情况有所好转,但在2025年和2026年初,我多次听到这句话。
Let’s go more into why this is really problematic.
让我们更深入地探讨为什么这确实是个问题。
Without good culture, everything else won’t work well
没有良好的文化,其他一切都不会顺利运作
Many executives believe that AI will just magically increase the productivity of everyone. But the reason that often doesn’t work is Conway’s law. It states:
许多高管相信AI会神奇地提高每个人的生产力。但往往不奏效的原因是康威定律。它指出:
Organizations which design systems (in the broad sense used here) are constrained to produce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations.
设计系统(在此广义上使用)的组织,其设计受到限制,只能产生与其沟通结构相仿的设计。
I mention this law quite a lot in different articles, because it’s just so important. And the reason why it’s particularly relevant in this case is that the overall productivity and the “end product” mimic the overall culture of the organization.
我在不同文章中多次提到这条定律,因为它太重要了。而它在此特别相关的原因是,整体生产力和“最终产品”模仿了组织的整体文化。
If the culture is bad, the end product will be bad as well, because people just don’t work together well and they don’t communicate properly. But if the culture is good, then often the end product will be good as well.
如果文化不好,最终产品也会不好,因为人们不能很好地合作,沟通也不顺畅。但如果文化好,那么最终产品往往也会好。
So, you should always think about good culture as a prerequisite for everything else. And I like to make an analogy to what health is to us, humans. Without health, we can’t do anything else well.
所以,你应该始终把良好的文化视为其他一切的前提。我喜欢把它类比为健康对我们人类的意义。没有健康,我们无法做好其他任何事情。
And the same is true for organizations with bad culture, everything else won’t be good as well.
对于文化不佳的组织也是如此,其他一切也不会好。
“Other companies are 10x more productive by using this AI tool”
“其他公司使用这个AI工具生产力提高了10倍”
Now, here comes the problem that many people fall into, especially CEOs and other executives. They see either a competitor or some other company reporting 10x higher productivity using a certain AI tool.
现在,这里出现了很多人,尤其是CEO和其他高管容易陷入的问题。他们看到竞争对手或其他公司报告使用某个AI工具生产力提高了10倍。
They start to panic, they start feeling FOMO (fear of missing out), and they start blaming people around them: “Why don’t we have that same amount of productivity as well?”
他们开始恐慌,开始感到FOMO(错失恐惧症),并开始责怪周围的人:“为什么我们没有同样的生产力?”
A lot of the CEOs are unaware of what kind of problems this may bring. Especially to the culture of the organization. When you start actively “blaming”, it shows to everyone that they are not doing their job well, and that you don’t trust them to make good decisions.
许多CEO并未意识到这可能带来的问题,尤其是对组织文化的影响。当你开始积极“指责”时,这向所有人表明他们工作不力,且你不信任他们能做出明智决策。
And this especially falls hard on engineers and engineering leaders, as they are often viewed as people who should be initiating AI adoption.
这对工程师和工程领导者尤其沉重,因为他们常被视为应推动AI应用的人。
What many CEOs don’t realize is that a lot of the “reporting” of AI increasing productivity by 10x is more or less selling a certain AI product, or a certain partnership where they are promoting the other product.
许多CEO没有意识到的是,很多关于AI将生产力提升10倍的“报告”多少是在推销某种AI产品或某种合作关系,其中他们是在推广另一产品。
So, many of the CEOs fall for the trick and make their company culture a lot worse.
因此,许多CEO中了这个圈套,使公司文化变得更糟。
My recommendation: Always take a look at what the incentives are behind people saying something, that says a lot about whether it’s true or not.
我的建议:始终审视人们言论背后的动机,这能很大程度上说明其真实性。
AI makes good culture even more valuable
AI使良好文化更具价值
Here is another really important point, and many people seem to forget it. As we mentioned, good culture is a prerequisite for everything else. But when it comes to AI, it amplifies everything you already have.
这里还有另一个非常重要的点,许多人似乎忘记了。正如我们提到的,良好文化是一切的前提。但谈到AI时,它会放大你已有的一切。
So, both AI and good culture go hand in hand really well together. AI makes bad communication even worse, it also makes bad architecture even worse as well.
因此,AI和良好文化相辅相成。AI使糟糕的沟通更糟,也使糟糕的架构更糟。
But if you have a good culture and good architecture, people will be more productive because they will help each other, and AI will also have a better blueprint of what good looks like because of good architecture.
但如果你有良好的文化和架构,人们会更高效,因为他们会互相帮助,而AI也会因良好架构而对“好”的样子有更好的蓝图。
Always keep this in mind. Just starting to use AI for everything just makes things worse if you don’t have good processes, architecture, and people don’t work together as a team.
始终记住这一点。如果没有良好的流程、架构,且人们不团结协作,仅仅开始到处使用AI只会让事情更糟。
Everyone just goes in the wrong direction faster.
每个人只会更快地朝错误方向前进。
This is my recommendation for building a good culture
这是我关于构建良好文化的建议
If you’re wondering whether you have a great culture inside your team or organization, here are some useful questions to answer:
如果你想知道团队或组织内是否有优秀文化,以下是一些有用的问题来回答:
- Do people know what they are responsible for?
- Can they make decisions without unnecessary approvals?
- Do they feel safe challenging leadership?
- Do teams trust each other?
- Are priorities clear?
- Can people disagree constructively?
- Do we reward outcomes?
- Do people understand why they are building something?
- Do we learn from failures, or do we look for someone to blame?
- 人们知道自己的职责吗?
- 他们能在无需不必要审批的情况下做决策吗?
- 他们是否感到可以安全地质疑领导层?
- 团队之间相互信任吗?
- 优先级是否清晰?
- 人们能否建设性地提出异议?
- 我们奖励成果吗?
- 人们理解他们为何构建某物吗?
- 我们是从失败中学习,还是寻找指责对象?
If the answer to these is “Yes”, then you are on a good track to have a good culture. Additionally, here is my personal checklist that I look at when doing an assessment of a certain engineering culture:
如果这些问题的答案是“是”,那么你正走在良好文化的正确道路上。此外,这是我评估特定工程文化时查看的个人清单:
Checklist for a great engineering organization
优秀工程组织的清单
You can find my full checklist for assessing whether a certain engineering organization is great or not.
你可以在这里找到我用来评估某个工程组织是否优秀的完整检查清单。
You can use the same checklist in your case as well. This checklist provides you with a guide on what you should focus on in order to create a great engineering organization where everyone can thrive.
你也可以在自己的案例中使用同样的检查清单。这份清单为你提供了指导,告诉你应该关注哪些方面,以创建一个让每个人都能蓬勃发展的优秀工程组织。
It works for organizations with multiple teams or smaller organizations. You can also use this for a specific team that is part of the bigger organization as well.
它适用于拥有多个团队的组织或较小的组织。你也可以将其用于更大组织中的特定团队。
Paid subscribers, you can get it here: 🎁 Products for paid subscribers.
付费订阅者,你可以在这里获取:🎁 付费订阅者的产品。
Additionally, take a look at how I do a full engineering organization audit in this article:
此外,看看我在这篇文章中如何进行完整的工程组织审计:
This is How I do a Full Engineering Org Audit
这是我进行完整工程组织审计的方式
Gregor Ojstersek
Gregor Ojstersek
·
·
December 10, 2025
2025年12月10日
Read full story
阅读完整故事
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力