马拉维700美元现金补助计划成效显著
$700 Cash Grants Transform Lives in Malawi
More now, we're joined by Bloomberg News reporter, in Johannesburg. Nancy, can you explain I mean, there have been different ways to do this. I think about, you know, microloans and and kind of direct lending. But what makes this program different, and and why was it so successful? Successful? Yeah. Well, basically, what makes it different is the size. It has been done before by GiveDirectly, which has been active in a number of countries, including The US.
现在,我们连线约翰内斯堡的彭博新闻社记者。南希,你能解释一下吗?我的意思是,实现这一目标有不同的方式,比如小额贷款和直接借贷。但这个项目有何不同,又为何如此成功?成功?是的。嗯,基本上,不同之处在于规模。GiveDirectly此前已经做过类似的事,该组织在包括美国在内的多个国家活跃。
But in the past, either it's been much smaller trials or just certain people in a community. For example, the poorest people in the community would have got the the money. What they've done here is taken what they call a district level, in fact, two districts, and all eligible adults, which are anyone with an ID book, which is a Malawian ID, is eligible to get the the 700. And almost everybody takes it out, something like 98 to 99%.
但在过去,要么是规模小得多的试验,要么只针对社区中的特定人群。例如,社区中最贫困的人会得到这笔钱。而他们在这里做的是,选取了他们所称的区级单位,实际上是两个区,所有符合条件的成年人,即任何持有身份证件(即马拉维身份证)的人,都有资格获得这700元。而且几乎每个人都领取了,大约有98%到99%的人。
And then, yes, you can do whatever you want with it with the idea being that most people will use it to better their lives or start up some sort of economic activity. And how are we seeing the funds be deployed? Are people renovating their houses or buying produce? What's kind of the on the ground reporting that you guys saw? Well, there's all sorts of things. So the main village we went to, Kamala, what we noticed is we met a couple of people.
然后,是的,你可以用它做任何你想做的事,其理念是大多数人会用这笔钱来改善生活或开展某种经济活动。那么我们看到这些资金是如何被使用的呢?人们是在翻修房屋还是购买农产品?你们在现场报道中看到了什么?嗯,有各种各样的用途。我们去的那个主要村庄,卡马拉,我们注意到我们遇到了一些人。
We met a lot of people. One of them was had set up a a cinema. I mean, it's just a room where he bought a CV and a sound system, and it was showing dubbed Nigerian movies dubbed in which is a local language. Oh, that's great. In Hollywood. We love that. We had a tailor who there was suddenly huge demand because people had money, so they wanted better clothes. So he bought himself an electric sewing machine so he could make better dresses and put up the cost of it.
我们遇到了很多人。其中一个人开了一家电影院。我的意思是,那只是一个房间,他买了一台CV和一套音响系统,正在播放配音成当地语言的尼日利亚电影。哦,那太好了。在好莱坞,我们喜欢这个。我们还遇到了一位裁缝,突然有大量需求,因为人们有钱了,所以他们想要更好的衣服。于是他给自己买了一台电动缝纫机,这样他就能做出更好的衣服,并提高了价格。
Somebody else had bought a fridge so they could sell chilled water. It's quite hot there. A lot of people were plastering inside of their houses, which is not always the case. And what does surprise me is that a lot of people putting corrugated iron on their roof. Now corrugated iron sheets in a lot of countries is indicative of poverty, but Malaga, which is really poor, most people have to make do with thatch. And in summer, it rains heavily, so water comes straight through the thatch and destroys the bags of pigeon peas or millets or corn or whatever you might have grown the previous season that you're not relying on.
另一个人买了一台冰箱,这样他们就能卖冰水。那里天气很热。很多人都在粉刷房屋内部,这并不总是常见的。让我惊讶的是,很多人都在屋顶上铺了波纹铁皮。在许多国家,波纹铁皮是贫困的象征,但马拉维非常贫穷,大多数人只能用茅草屋顶。夏天雨水多,雨水会直接透过茅草,毁掉一袋袋的鸽子豆、小米或玉米,或者你上一季种植并依赖的任何作物。
So it makes a big difference. It's interesting. Most of the cases, it seems like people did try to do something entrepreneurial with it, something that would continue to better their lives in the future. Can you talk to us about was there any research or anything that you learned as you why you think that was? And put us into perspective, $700 there. What does that mean? How much is the average salary per month? How much money is that in local terms?
所以这产生了巨大的差异。有趣的是,在大多数情况下,人们似乎确实尝试用它做些有创业精神的事情,一些能在未来持续改善他们生活的事情。你能跟我们谈谈,你有没有学到什么研究或发现,让你觉得为什么会这样?并且给我们一个背景参考,那700美元意味着什么?当地平均月薪是多少?按当地标准,这笔钱有多少?
Well, dealing dealing with that first, it's a lot of money. The capital income in Malawi is something like 670 US a year. So that's about a year's income for a British Malawian. Now we're in rural areas, which are a lot poorer than where the little wealth there is is concentrated, which is in the two big cities of Blanta and Longue. So people really don't have much money. So you can do an awful lot with that. You can you can fix your house to a certain extent.
嗯,先处理第一个问题,那是一大笔钱。马拉维的人均年收入大约是670美元。所以这大约相当于一个英国马拉维人一年的收入。我们现在说的是农村地区,那里比财富集中的两个大城市布兰太尔和隆圭要贫穷得多。所以人们真的没有多少钱。因此,用这笔钱你可以做很多事情。你可以在一定程度上修缮你的房子。
You can buy, you know, a sewing machine, farming equipment. You can buy livestock. A lot of people did that as well. And from there, you can make money. So for instance, if you set up, you know, a few chickens, you can sell eggs. If you have a cow, you can sell them milk, things like that. How do they actually go through distributing the the cash? Is it all in one lump sum, and who's actually behind the effort? Okay.
你可以买一台缝纫机、农具。你可以买牲畜。很多人也这么做了。然后从那里,你可以赚钱。比如,如果你养几只鸡,你可以卖鸡蛋。如果你有一头牛,你可以卖牛奶,诸如此类。他们实际上是如何分发现金的?是一次性全部发放吗,谁在背后推动这项工作?好的。
So most of the money for this particular program comes from Canva, which is an Australian startup design startup. And the billionaire founders of of Canva really like this program. So they gave a $150,000,000 to it, and they visited it and had some input into its design. The way it's done is people are registered. It's explained how it works, Basically, it's the no strings. You don't have to do anything particularly with the money.
所以这个特定项目的大部分资金来自Canva,一家澳大利亚的初创设计公司。Canva的亿万富翁创始人非常喜欢这个项目。所以他们给了1.5亿美元,并且他们参观了项目,还对设计提出了一些意见。操作方式是人们先登记。会解释这是如何运作的,基本上,这是无附加条件的。你不必用这笔钱做任何特别的事情。
You can make your own mind up. Then your details are taken down. Then you are given the money through a mobile finance app. You know, in Africa, most people get money via mobile finance as opposed to mobile banks. First of all, they send a small token amount. I think it was 80,000 of the 1,200,000. Then they follow-up to make sure you've got it so they've got the right number. There were no mistakes. And then a few weeks later, you get the rest.
你可以自己做决定。然后记录下你的详细信息。接着通过一个移动金融应用给你钱。你知道,在非洲,大多数人通过移动金融而不是移动银行收钱。首先,他们会发送一小笔象征性的金额。我记得是120万中的8万。然后他们会跟进确认你收到了,确保号码正确。没有差错。然后几周后,你会收到剩下的部分。
Anthony, I think there's a lot of issues right now with some of the major aid groups. So we've got USAID being basically deleted off the map here in The US, but there's a lot of controversy right now about when you give to a charity, what the charity does with that money. It seems to me like this is not only good for the people receiving it, but it's good for the people who are giving it when they can see the direct use of their dollars.
安东尼,我认为目前一些主要援助组织存在很多问题。比如在美国,美国国际开发署(USAID)基本上被从地图上抹去了,但现在有很多争议,关于当你向慈善机构捐款时,该机构如何使用这笔钱。在我看来,这不仅对受助者有益,而且当捐赠者能看到他们的钱被直接使用时,对捐赠者也是有益的。
Do you expect given the it's new, but the nominal success of this program that you will see more programs like this going forward? Yeah. I think it is would be really liked by donors. The reason being is 83% of what they give goes directly to recipients. Now that's very high for a for an aid organization because normally, say, you were conducting some sort of program, you know, basically building irrigation facilities or something like that, you'd have to pay for labor, transport, equipments, people flying out, experts.
鉴于这个项目是新的,但名义上取得了成功,您是否预期未来会有更多类似的项目?是的。我认为捐赠者会非常喜欢它。原因在于,他们捐赠的83%直接用于受助者。这对援助组织来说是非常高的比例,因为通常来说,比如你开展某种项目,比如建设灌溉设施之类的,你需要支付劳动力、运输、设备、人员出差和专家费用。
It all adds up. Whereas here, there's minimal staff, trans by mobile money, so pretty cheap, And there's not much beyond that that needs to be done to administer the program. Just a little bit of research to follow-up and see what happens to the money. So if successful and, you know, on the face of it, it was pretty successful from what I saw. It could definitely be replicated, and that's what Go Directly and Canva really want people to see and hope to see it replicated in other countries or other parts of Malawi even.
这些费用加起来就很多了。而在这里,工作人员极少,通过移动货币转账,所以成本很低,而且除此之外,管理这个项目所需的工作并不多。只需进行一点研究来跟进,看看资金的使用情况。所以如果成功的话,而且从表面上看,据我所见,它相当成功。它肯定可以被复制,这正是Go Directly和Canva希望人们看到的,并希望看到它在其他国家甚至马拉维的其他地区得到复制。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力