康涅狄格州总检察长起诉Kalshi，要求禁止提供体育赛事合约
Connecticut Attorney General Escalates Action Against Kalshi Amid CFTC Lawsuit
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s ongoing lawsuit against officials in Connecticut hasn’t deterred the state’s attorney general, William Tong, from escalating enforcement actions against Kalshi.
商品期货交易委员会对康涅狄格州官员的持续诉讼并未阻止该州总检察长威廉·唐加强对Kalshi的执法行动。
Tong’s office announced a new lawsuit filed in a state court against Kalshi on Wednesday.
唐的办公室周三宣布在州法院对Kalshi提起新诉讼。
The lawsuit asks the court to enjoin Kalshi from offering sports event contracts to people in Connecticut, a restriction that Kalshi has already implemented in Washington to comply with a state court order there. The result could be new filings in federal court and a judiciary that grows more unfavorable for trading sports event contracts on prediction markets exchanges across the United States.
该诉讼要求法院禁止Kalshi向康涅狄格州居民提供体育赛事合约，这一限制Kalshi已在华盛顿实施以遵守那里的州法院命令。结果可能导致新的联邦法院诉讼，以及司法机构对在美国各预测市场交易所交易体育赛事合约变得更加不利。
Tong announces new lawsuit against Kalshi
唐宣布对Kalshi提起新诉讼
According to the announcement, Tong’s efforts are in collaboration with the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (CDCP) and Gov. Ned Lamont. The complaint petitions the court for an “injunction to block the online betting site from offering unlicensed sports wagers in Connecticut.”
根据公告，唐的努力是与康涅狄格州消费者保护部门（CDCP）和州长内德·拉蒙特合作进行的。诉状请求法院发出“禁令，阻止该在线投注网站在康涅狄格州提供未经许可的体育博彩。”
This is an escalation of efforts that began in December 2025 when the CDCP sent a cease-and-desist letter to Kalshi, ordering the company to stop providing sports event contracts to Connecticuters. The regulators stated that Kalshi doing so violates the state’s gambling laws.
这是自2025年12月CDCP向Kalshi发出停止函以来的升级行动，命令该公司停止向康涅狄格州居民提供体育赛事合约。监管机构表示，Kalshi这样做违反了该州的赌博法律。
Kalshi sued the CDCP that same month, and the CFTC brought its own case against Lamont and Tong in April 2026. While the US District Court for the District of Connecticut has yet to issue a substantial decision in the CFTC case, the same court denied Kalshi’s motion for an injunction against enforcement actions in early August 2026.
Kalshi在同月起诉了CDCP，而CFTC在2026年4月对拉蒙特和唐提起了自己的案件。虽然美国康涅狄格州地区法院尚未对CFTC案件作出实质性裁决，但同一法院在2026年8月初驳回了Kalshi对执法行动的禁令动议。
Kalshi has appealed that ruling to the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but in the meantime, the win seems to have emboldened Tong. Developments in Washington may have contributed as well.
Kalshi已向美国第二巡回上诉法院对该裁决提出上诉，但与此同时，这一胜利似乎助长了唐的气焰。华盛顿的事态发展可能也起到了作用。
Tong could be trying to replicate Brown’s success
唐可能试图复制布朗的成功
On August 13, a state judge in Washington ordered Kalshi to block access for people in the state to most of its event contract categories. Kalshi has since complied with that order, although it has the option to appeal in the Washington court system.
8月13日，华盛顿州的一名州法官命令Kalshi阻止该州居民访问其大多数赛事合约类别。Kalshi此后已遵守该命令，尽管它可以选择在华盛顿法院系统中提出上诉。
While Tong might be trying to achieve the same success as Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, Connecticut presents different circumstances. Most forms of online gambling, including sports wagering, remain illegal in Washington.
虽然唐可能试图取得与华盛顿总检察长尼克·布朗相同的成功，但康涅狄格州的情况有所不同。华盛顿的大多数在线赌博形式，包括体育博彩，仍然是非法的。
Meanwhile, Connecticut permits online sports betting through its state lottery and via compacts with the two tribal gaming authorities within the state’s borders. The compacts and state law limit legal sports wagering to those channels, though.
与此同时，康涅狄格州通过其州彩票以及与州内两个部落博彩管理局的协议，允许在线体育博彩。不过，协议和州法律将合法的体育博彩限制在这些渠道内。
Tong’s ask of the court is narrower than Brown’s as well, focusing only on sports event contracts. That may make the path to an injunction clearer, but it may not be all that it accomplishes.
汤的法院请求比布朗的更为狭窄，仅聚焦于体育赛事合约。这可能使禁令之路更为清晰，但其影响或许不止于此。
Possible responses from the CFTC, Kalshi
CFTC和Kalshi可能的回应
Tong’s lawsuit might prompt additional filings with the US District Court in Connecticut and the Second Circuit, seeking emergency stays of the litigation while the cases that preceded this new filing play out. The CFTC made a similar failed bid in a US district court in neighboring New York in early August.
汤的诉讼可能促使向康涅狄格州美国地区法院和第二巡回法院提交额外文件，寻求在先前案件审理期间紧急中止此诉讼。CFTC在8月初曾在邻近的纽约美国地区法院提出类似请求，但未成功。
Should the CFTC or Kalshi forgo those emergency petitions, or if those efforts fail, it could clear the way for Kalshi to apply its geofencing limits to Connecticut. That event would tip the balance even further away from a secure future for sports event contracts on the platform.
如果CFTC或Kalshi放弃这些紧急请求，或者这些努力失败，可能为Kalshi将其地理围栏限制应用于康涅狄格州铺平道路。这一事件将进一步削弱该平台上体育赛事合约的安全未来。
Unfavorable results for sports event contract trading adding up
体育赛事合约交易的不利结果累积
If Kalshi faces restrictions in Connecticut, it would be another in a series of court defeats for the CFTC and itself. The aforementioned results in New York and Washington were preceded by a disfavorable summary judgment from a federal judge in Utah and a denial of the CFTC’s injunction request in Wisconsin.
如果Kalshi在康涅狄格州面临限制，这将是CFTC和Kalshi一系列法庭败诉中的又一例。上述纽约和华盛顿的结果之前，犹他州联邦法官已作出不利的简易判决，威斯康星州也拒绝了CFTC的禁令请求。
Each unfavorable ruling against prediction market exchanges has a synergistic effect at the federal level, with judges citing previous cases as rationale for their decisions. While that isn’t as much of a concern in state-court cases across states, Tong’s move signals confidence that the court will grant him the injunction he seeks.
每次对预测市场交易所的不利裁决在联邦层面产生协同效应，法官引用先前案例作为裁决依据。虽然这在各州法院案件中不那么令人担忧，但汤的行动表明他对法院将批准他所寻求的禁令充满信心。
The post Connecticut Attorney General Escalates Action Against Kalshi Amid CFTC Lawsuit appeared first on DeFi Rate.
文章《康涅狄格州总检察长在CFTC诉讼中升级对Kalshi的行动》首发于DeFi Rate。
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力