跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选72SaaStr 博客(RSS)产品与增长

B2B营销难规模化?看总花费与首年ACV比值,而非单次活动

Dear SaaStr: What Are Some Signs That Your B2B Marketing Programs Won’t Scale Well?

原文
发到 X

Dear SaaStr: What Are Some Signs That Your B2B Marketing Programs Won’t Scale Well?

亲爱的SaaStr:有哪些迹象表明你的B2B营销项目无法良好扩展?

The #1 flag your marketing efforts aren’t working is that you are spending too much — but importantly, in the aggregate. Don’t overindex on any individual campaign or initiative.

你的营销努力不起作用的头号标志是花费过多——但重要的是,总体而言。不要过度关注任何单个活动或计划。

Let me dig in a bit. Most B2B companies, once they have a mini-brand, start to get some amount of organic, “free” leads. People hear about you. They come to you. Not a ton, at first, but some. The CPA here is basically $0. And that’s the boost that all marketing teams get. It flatters marketing. It makes it look more cost-effective, and effective overall, than it really is.

让我深入一点。大多数B2B公司,一旦有了小品牌,就开始获得一定数量的有机的、“免费”的线索。人们听说你,他们来找你。起初不多,但有一些。这里的获客成本基本上是0美元。这是所有营销团队都能得到的助力。它美化了营销,让它看起来比实际更具成本效益,整体上也更有效。

All paid marketing is expensive. All of it. You’ll wince and cry. A sponsored webinar for $35,000? A trade show for $80,000? An ad in a top newsletter for $20k?

所有付费营销都很昂贵。全部都是。你会皱眉甚至哭泣。一个赞助的网络研讨会要35,000美元?一个贸易展要80,000美元?顶级通讯中的一则广告要20,000美元?

But if things are going well, on a blended basis, at least, it should all work out. Your marketing costs should be < 3–6 months of your first year ACV, averaged across all sources of customers, including free. Ultimately, all the best software companies get the majority of their new customers from word-of-mouth and referrals. You need to invest there, too. But even once you put real $$ there, the CAC will be low.

但如果一切顺利,至少在混合基础上,应该都能平衡。你的营销成本应低于首年ACV的3-6个月,平均计算所有客户来源,包括免费来源。最终,所有最好的软件公司大部分新客户都来自口碑和推荐。你也需要在那里投资。但即使你投入真金白银,CAC也会很低。

So my rule from all of this is basically, invest in any marketing program that even returns $1 for $1 spent. Yes, that’s expensive. But if your brand is strong and your customers are happy, and second-order revenue kicks in, that should blend to a decent CAC when you add in the free-ish leads. And if those customers are happy, that $1 will beget $5 and $10 over time. So it’s worth it. More on that here:

所以我从中得出的规则基本上是,投资于任何即使只回报1美元对1美元支出的营销项目。是的,那很昂贵。但如果你的品牌强大,客户满意,二阶收入开始产生,加上那些近乎免费的线索,应该能混合成一个合理的CAC。如果那些客户满意,那1美元会随着时间变成5美元和10美元。所以这是值得的。更多内容在这里:

CLTV Isn’t The Whole Story. Don’t Shortchange Second-Order Revenue.

CLTV不是全部。不要低估二阶收入。

If your head of marketing can’t even do that — if your total marketing spend / total new customer (paid + free) revenue doesn’t make sense — it’s a sign to find someone new. That may sound harsh. But they’ll just spend all the money.

如果你的营销负责人连这一点都做不到——如果总营销支出/总新客户(付费+免费)收入不合理——那就是该找新人的迹象。这听起来可能苛刻。但他们只会把钱都花光。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

另一事件,读法相近