跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选88Latent Space(RSS)行业动态

Simile AI获20亿美元B轮融资,探索人类行为模拟新范式

Simulation: the new Scaling Law — Joon Sung Park, Simile AI

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

20亿美金的巨额融资标志着AI Agent从交互向深层社会模拟的重大转折,值得行业关注其商业化路径与技术可行性。

When we first dicsussed the Summer of Simulative AI in 2024 we knew it would be a brief summer, but it has recently come back with a vengeance with SimGym in April and now Simile AI’s $2B Series B, backed by GreenOaks and Index Ventures with prominent backers like Fei-Fei Li and Andrej Karpathy, running tens of millions of simulations for Fortune 100 clients like CVS and 85–99% accuracy vs human focus groups.

2024年我们首次讨论‘模拟AI之夏’时,就知道那将是一个短暂的夏天,但今年四月SimGym的强势回归以及如今Simile AI获得的20亿美元B轮融资(由GreenOaks和Index Ventures领投,Fei-Fei Li和Andrej Karpathy等知名投资人参投),让这股热潮卷土重来。Simile AI为CVS等财富100强客户提供服务,运行着数以千万计的模拟,其准确率高达85–99%,远超人类焦点小组。

Time to catch up on why this Second Summer of simulation is working!

是时候来了解一下为什么这次“模拟的第二夏”如此奏效了!

From creating Smallville, the landmark 2023 paper on Generative Agents that showed AI characters could remember, plan, socialize, and develop emergent behaviors, to now building foundation models of human behavior, Joon Sung Park is trying to answer a much bigger question: what if we could simulate the world before making decisions in it? In this episode, the Simile co-founder and CEO joins us to unpack the path from generative agents to digital twins, why today’s frontier models still fail to capture how humans actually behave, and what it would take to eventually simulate all 8 billion people on Earth.

从创建Smallville——那篇展示AI角色能够记忆、规划、社交并产生涌现行为的2023年开创性论文《生成式智能体》——到如今构建人类行为的基础模型,Joon Sung Park正试图回答一个更大的问题:如果我们在做决定之前就能模拟世界,会怎样?在本期节目中,Simile联合创始人兼CEO与我们深入探讨了从生成式智能体到数字孪生的发展路径,为何当今的前沿模型仍无法捕捉人类的真实行为,以及最终模拟地球上80亿人口需要付出怎样的努力。

We go deep on Simile’s approach to modeling human behavior: long-form interviews, observational and transaction data, randomized controlled trials, population-level and individual-level models, and post-training on the causal mechanisms behind why people make decisions. Joon explains how his research created digital twins that reproduced human behavior and attitudes 85% as accurately as people reproduced their own responses, why models optimized to be rational can be bad simulations of irrational humans, and why understanding “social physics” may require changing model weights rather than simply prompting frontier LLMs.

我们深入探讨了Simile对建模人类行为的方法:长篇访谈、观察与交易数据、随机对照试验、群体层面与个体层面的模型,以及对人们做出决策背后的因果机制进行后训练。Joon解释了其研究如何创造出能复现人类行为和态度的数字孪生,其准确度达到人类复现自身反应的85%;为何旨在追求理性的模型可能成为对非理性人类糟糕的模拟;以及为何理解“社会物理学”可能需要改变模型权重,而不仅仅是提示前沿的大语言模型。

We also explore the much larger ambition behind simulation: testing products and policies before deploying them, finding counterintuitive paths toward desired outcomes, modeling emergent behavior across entire societies, and potentially tackling problems like climate change, democratic instability, and UBI. Joon reflects on scaling laws for simulation, the economics of data-center-scale simulated worlds, the connection to Thomas Schelling and psychohistory, why simulation is surprisingly similar to painting, and whether we might already be living in one.

我们还探讨了模拟背后更宏大的愿景:在部署产品和服务之前进行测试,寻找通向预期结果的反直觉路径,对整个社会的涌现行为进行建模,并有可能解决气候变化、民主不稳定和基本收入(UBI)等问题。Joon反思了模拟的扩展定律、数据中心规模模拟世界的经济学、与Thomas Schelling及心理史学的联系、模拟与绘画惊人的相似之处,以及我们是否已经生活在一个模拟之中。

We discuss:

我们将讨论:

  • How Smallville and Generative Agents led to Simile
  • Why Joon’s team asked: “What if we can just recreate the world that we live in?”
  • Why useful personal agents require deep models of their users
  • Memory architectures, Markdown files, and the limits of prompting
  • “Social physics” and behavioral foundation models
  • Why web data captures what people say more than what they actually do
  • Interviews, transactions, observational data, and randomized controlled trials
  • Why predicting the future matters less than understanding how to shape it
  • How Simile creates representative simulated populations
  • Simulation versus prediction and the connection to Foundation’s psychohistory
  • How to evaluate simulations instead of simply stacking LLM hallucinations
  • Creating digital twins of 1,000 real people and reaching 85% behavioral accuracy
  • Why frontier models can struggle to reproduce real human behavior
  • Why good simulations need to reproduce human biases and mistakes
  • Post-training models on randomized controlled trials
  • Population-level versus individual-level simulation
  • Scaling laws for human simulation
  • The long-term ambition to simulate all 8 billion people on Earth
  • Whether simulations could help solve climate change or detect collapsing democracy
  • Thomas Schelling and the history of agent-based modeling
  • Why future simulations could require an entire data center
  • Multi-agent simulations and what happens when simulated people interact
  • Replacing expensive human panels with synthetic populations
  • Why market research is only the starting point for simulation
  • Why Joon sees simulation as surprisingly similar to painting
  • Using simulation to study questions like UBI
  • Whether we are already living in a simulation
  • Why AGI and simulation may be the twin technologies of advanced civilizations
  • Smallville和生成式智能体如何催生了Simile
  • 为何Joon的团队提出:“如果我们能重现我们所生活的世界呢?”
  • 为何有用的个人智能体需要对其用户有深入的模型
  • 记忆架构、Markdown 文件以及提示工程的局限
  • "社会物理学"与行为基础模型
  • 为何网络数据更能捕捉人们所说的话,而非他们实际的行为
  • 访谈、交易记录、观察数据以及随机对照试验
  • 为何预测未来不如理解如何塑造未来重要
  • Simile 如何构建具有代表性的模拟人群
  • 模拟与预测的区别,及其与 Foundation 心理史学的联系
  • 如何评估模拟结果,而非简单堆砌大语言模型的幻觉
  • 为 1,000 名真实人物创建数字孪生,并达到 85% 的行为准确率
  • 为何前沿模型难以复现真实的人类行为
  • 为何优质的模拟需要复现人类的偏见与错误
  • 在随机对照试验上对模型进行后训练
  • 群体层面与个体层面的模拟
  • 人类模拟的缩放定律
  • 模拟地球上全部 80 亿人的长期愿景
  • 模拟能否帮助解决气候变化或检测民主制度的崩溃
  • 托马斯·谢林与基于智能体的建模历史
  • 为何未来的模拟可能需要整个数据中心
  • 多智能体模拟以及模拟人物互动时发生的情况
  • 用合成人群取代昂贵的人工专家小组
  • 为何市场调研仅是模拟的起点
  • 为何 Joon 认为模拟与绘画惊人地相似
  • 利用模拟研究全民基本收入(UBI)等问题
  • 我们是否已经生活在模拟之中
  • 为什么通用人工智能(AGI)与模拟可能是高级文明的双生技术

Joon Sung Park

Joon Sung Park

  • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joonspark
  • X: https://x.com/joon_s_pk
  • Website: https://www.joonsungpark.com
  • Simile: https://www.simile.com
  • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joonspark
  • X: https://x.com/joon_s_pk
  • 网站: https://www.joonsungpark.com
  • Simile: https://www.simile.com

Timestamps

时间戳

00:00:00 Introduction and Joon’s Path from Art to AI

00:00:00 引言以及 Joon 从艺术到 AI 的历程

00:01:46 Smallville, Generative Agents, and the Origins of Simulation

00:01:46 《小镇》、生成式智能体以及模拟的起源

00:05:03 “Let’s Just Create a World” and the Future of Personal Agents

00:05:03 “让我们创造一个世界”与个人智能体的未来

00:09:53 Social Physics and Behavioral Foundation Models

00:09:53 社会物理学与行为基础模型

00:14:08 Prediction vs. Simulation: How Do You Shape the Future?

00:14:08 预测与模拟:如何塑造未来?

00:16:59 How Simile Models Real People and Populations

00:16:59 Simile 如何建模真实人群与人口

00:25:35 Evaluating Simulations, Digital Twins, and 85% Accuracy

00:25:35 评估模拟、数字孪生及 85% 的准确率

00:30:23 Post-Training Models to Reproduce Human Behavior

00:30:23 用于复现人类行为的后训练模型

00:40:04 Scaling Laws and Simulating 8 Billion People

00:40:04 缩放定律与模拟 80 亿人

00:43:10 From Schelling to Society-Scale Agent Simulations

00:43:10 从谢林到社会规模智能体模拟

00:46:13 The Cost and Economics of Simulating the World

00:46:13 模拟世界的成本与经济模型

00:52:05 Real-World Use Cases, Synthetic Populations, and the Market

00:52:05 现实世界用例、合成人口与市场

00:57:27 The Future of Simulation, Painting, and UBI

00:57:27 模拟的未来、绘画与全民基本收入(UBI)

01:04:23 Are We Already Living in a Simulation?

01:04:23 我们是否已经生活在模拟之中?

01:06:08 Building Simile and Hiring

01:06:08 构建 Simile 与招聘

Transcript

逐字稿

Introduction: Joon Sung Park, Simile, and the Story So Far

引言:Joon Sung Park、Simile 以及迄今为止的故事

Vibhu [00:00:00]: Today, we have Joon in the podcast. Excited to kick this one off. Very exciting company. I wanna kick off and ask you the question, talk us through the story of your life. How have you gotten here?

Vibhu [00:00:00]:今天,我们请到了 Joon 做客播客。很兴奋能开启这一期。这是一家非常令人兴奋的公司。我想先开场问你一个问题,跟我们讲讲你的人生故事吧。你是如何走到今天的?

Joon [00:00:13]: Yeah, for sure. I’m really excited to be here. A story of my life. So I was born in Korea, and I lived there for a good 11 years or so of my life, and then my family moved to Boston. So we moved when I was 11, and my parents were doctors, so they were going through their postdoctoral studies. My dad was a surgeon, so he was doing his sabbatical years at the Boston Children’s Hospital. So I grew up there, not too close to tech. I was very much a music and artsy, painting kind of guy.

Joon [00:00:13]:是的,当然。我很兴奋能来到这里。我的人生故事是这样的:我出生在韩国,在那里生活了大约 11 年,之后我的家人搬到了波士顿。我们在我 11 岁时搬家,我的父母都是医生,当时他们正在进行博士后研究。我父亲是一名外科医生,所以他在波士顿儿童医院度过他的休假年(sabbatical years)。我就在那里长大,离科技圈不太近。我当时是个非常喜欢音乐和艺术、喜欢画画的人。

Vibhu [00:00:49]: Painting.

Vibhu [00:00:49]:画画。

Joon [00:00:49]: Exactly. I got into painting a little bit later, in high school, but that’s what I used to do. And then I grew up mostly in the East Coast after Korea. So I lived a good number of years in New Hampshire, and then I went to college in Pennsylvania. And I got into more of this tech scene, in college. So I was originally trained to be an artist. I thought that would be my professional career. So it wasn’t a hobby. It was like, “Hey, let’s make a living out of this.” And then gradually, I got really interested in this idea of, hey, the greatest artist often creates their own medium, and the best medium that we had available today was in computation. So I decided to go deeper into that, and one thing led to another, and we can go deeper into this, but I decided that research was something that I gradually got interested in, and here I am.

Joon [00:00:49]:没错。我高中时才稍微开始接触绘画,但那就是我以前常做的事。在韩国之后,我主要在美国东海岸长大。所以我在新罕布什尔州度过了很多年,然后在宾夕法尼亚州上大学。在大学里,我开始更多地接触科技领域。我最初是接受艺术家训练的,我以为那会成为我的职业道路。所以这不仅仅是一个爱好,而是想着“嘿,让我们靠这个谋生吧。”然后渐渐地,我对这样一个想法产生了浓厚的兴趣:最伟大的艺术家往往创造自己的媒介,而今天我们可用的最佳媒介就是计算。于是我决定深入钻研这一点,一环扣一环,我们可以深入探讨这个话题,但我逐渐对研究产生了兴趣,于是我就来到了这里。

Smallville, Generative Agents, and the 2023 Breakout Paper

Smallville、生成式智能体以及 2023 年的突破性论文

Swyx [00:01:46]: So there’s a lot that you packed into the research components. You had one of the best papers of 2023, which was the generative agents paper, commonly known as the Smallville paper.

Swyx [00:01:46]:你在研究部分投入了很多精力。你有一篇 2023 年最好的论文,也就是生成式智能体论文,通常被称为 Smallville 论文。

Swyx [00:01:58]: Feel free to call back to anything else that you mentioned, but most people would have heard of you from this. Do you have any statistics on how many people have, like, read it? arXiv gives you something, right? Some stats.

Swyx [00:01:58]:你可以随时回顾你提到的其他内容,但大多数人是通过这篇论文认识你的。关于有多少人读过它,你有什么统计数据吗?arXiv 会给你一些数据,对吧?有一些统计信息。

Joon [00:02:10]: Yeah, it’s a good question. How many people have read it, I’m not sure.

Joon [00:02:10]:嗯,这是个很好的问题。我不确定有多少人读过它。

Joon [00:02:14]: I know we do keep track of citations, and they are going up quite fast.

Joon [00:02:14]:我知道我们一直在跟踪引用情况,而且引用量增长得相当快。

Swyx [00:02:23]: Yeah, Google Scholar has 7,200 citations.

Swyx [00:02:23]:是的,Google Scholar 上有 7,200 次引用。

Vibhu [00:02:25]: I feel like it made a bigger hit than that, and it was a pretty instrumental paper. It got cited so many times.

Vibhu [00:02:25]:我觉得它的影响比这更大,这是一篇非常有影响力的论文。它被引用了无数次。

Swyx [00:02:34]: It is frequently the answer when people ask, “What is the best paper you’ve read recently?” It’s this one.

Swyx [00:02:34]:当人们问“你最近读过最好的论文是哪篇?”时,答案往往就是它。就是这篇。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

另一事件,读法相近