跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选7020VC(YouTube)战略与拆解

Uber总裁谈自动驾驶生死局与如何击败DoorDash

Uber President on Travis, China & Self-Driving | Why Autonomy Is Existential | How to Beat DoorDash

原文
发到 X

We're doing like 300 million trips a week. We were burning 52 million a week in China. We were competing in China with one hand tied behind our back. Andrew McDonald, he's the president and COO at Uber. He is Uber's longest tenur active employee. And today Uber is an absolute monster. They have a market cap of 160 billion, revenues of 52 billion in the full year of 2025. They have 200 million consumers that use the app monthly.

我们每周大约完成3亿次出行。在中国,我们每周烧掉5200万。我们在中国竞争时,相当于一只手被绑在背后。安德鲁·麦克唐纳,他是Uber的总裁兼首席运营官。他是Uber任职时间最长的在职员工。而今天的Uber绝对是个巨头。他们的市值达到1600亿,2025年全年营收为520亿。他们每月有2亿消费者使用这款应用。

This was a behind the scenes on Uber like we haven't seen before.

这是前所未见的Uber幕后故事。

Autonomy is as bad as it's ever going to be today, right? And every single day, it's going to get better. Like in the end, distribution wins. We could do everything we do today with less people in 5 years because of the power of AI. No one's been at the company longer than me at this point.

自动驾驶今天的状态,就是它未来最差的样子,对吧?而每一天,它都会变得更好。说到底,最终是分销渠道获胜。因为AI的力量,五年后我们可以用更少的人完成我们今天所做的一切。目前公司里没有人比我待得更久。

Ready to go. Mac, I am so excited for this, dude. I've wanted to make this happen. And we've been DMing for like a long time. It's It's so good to do it in person.

准备好了。Mac,我对此超级兴奋,兄弟。我一直想促成这件事。我们私信聊了很久了。能面对面交流真是太好了。

So great to be here. And you're right. I remember the first Twitter DM from you. And I was a bit of a fan from afar, as you probably hear often, but uh great to be here now and so glad to do it in person. So, I spoke to Dar before the show and I said, "What's his superpower?" He's been here for like over a decade, whatever, 12, 13 years,

很高兴来到这里。你说得对。我记得你给我的第一条Twitter私信。我以前算是远方的粉丝,你可能经常听到这种话,但现在很高兴能来到这里,也很高兴能当面交流。所以,节目开始前我跟Dar聊过,我问:"他的超能力是什么?"他在这里已经待了十多年了,大概12、13年,

14 years. 15 in May.

14年。到5月就15年了。

No one's been at the company longer than me at this point.

目前公司里没有人比我待得更久。

My god. Um, and I said, "What's his super?" And he said, "Oh, very simple. People really like him, but he is an execution machine, and he is very good at driving people." And I I suck at that. So can you no seriously how do you do that but retain people liking you?

天哪。嗯,我说:"他的超能力是什么?"他说:"哦,很简单。大家都很喜欢他,但他是一台执行机器,而且他非常擅长驱动别人。"而我在那方面很糟糕。所以你能不能——说真的,你是怎么做到既驱动别人,又让大家喜欢你的?

I get the question in the context of career advice. People start they join Uber they say you know you've been very successful at Uber. How do I you know how should I be successful here? What what did you do to get successful? And it it's hard because like every formula is different. Um but there's a couple things I say. One is and I think the most important thing is if you genuinely are just trying to do what you think is the right thing for the company and that is your filter and you kind of build uh trust that that's what you're optimizing for all the time on every decision big decisions and small decisions that you are using the lens of what is the best thing for Uber.

我经常在职业建议的语境下被问到这个问题。人们加入Uber后会问:你知道,你在Uber非常成功。我该怎么——你知道,我在这里该怎么取得成功?你做了什么才获得成功的?这很难回答,因为每个人的成功公式都不一样。但有几件事我会说。第一件,也是我认为最重要的一件事是:如果你真心只是想为公司做你认为正确的事,并以此为准则,然后你建立起信任,让大家相信你在每一个决策——无论大小——中始终以什么对Uber最有利为出发点,那么你就会成功。

You're not always going to get the decision right, but if people know that you're filtering on that, then I think that builds followership and trust over time. And then you can move people because if you're pushing on something, they know it's because you genuinely think it's the right thing to do. And then if you pair that with a deep knowledge of the business, and I' I've grown up in this business, so I know, especially ride hailing, like I know that better than anyone in the world at this point.

你并不总能做出正确的决定,但如果人们知道你在依据那个标准筛选,那么我认为这会随着时间建立起追随者和信任。然后你就能推动人们,因为如果你在推动某件事,他们知道那是因为你真心认为那是正确的事。如果你再将其与对业务的深入了解结合起来,而我是在这个行业里成长起来的,所以我知道,尤其是网约车,我比现在世界上任何人都更了解这个。

Um, those two things together, I think, are pretty powerful.

嗯,这两件事结合在一起,我认为是非常强大的。

You do literally know it better than anyone else in the world. Yeah,

你确实比世界上任何人都更了解这个。是的,

it's hard. I mean, it's only been around since 2009. I've been working on it since 2012, and you know, most folks from that time period are not working on it anymore. So,

这很难。我的意思是,它从2009年才出现。我从2012年开始从事这个,而且你知道,那个时期的大多数人已经不再从事这个了。所以,

you said when you genuinely believe it's the right thing for the company.

你说过当你真心相信这对公司是正确的事时。

What did you genuinely believe was the right thing for the company and it turned out you were wrong?

你真心相信对公司是正确的事,但结果证明你错了的是什么?

Uh, I mean, the first thing I say is like I I am wrong every single day. Um, big things and small things, right? I actually love the I think it's a Bezos quote which is if you want to be right most of the time you got to change your mind a lot or something something to that effect right which is effectively like you're going to be wrong a lot and actually the people who are successful over time are willing to change their mind so I I think that's true so I'm wrong a lot this is probably the most common running debate that Dar and I will have as I think of his tenure as CEO which is and and thematically it's like the tension between short-term levers and long-term levers for the business.

嗯,我的意思是,我首先说的是我每天都在犯错。嗯,大事和小事,对吧?我其实很喜欢,我想这是贝索斯的一句名言,大意是如果你想大多数时候都是对的,你就得经常改变你的想法,或者类似的意思,这实际上就是说你会经常犯错,而真正能长期成功的人是愿意改变想法的,所以我认为这是真的,所以我经常犯错。这可能是达尔和我之间最常有的争论,我想想他担任CEO的任期,主题上就是业务短期杠杆和长期杠杆之间的张力。

So, like a short-term lever for ride hill is like price, right? Um, every dollar that we can put back into lower pricing, I think is valuable. Even uh even if long-term there may be other things you want to do like acquire new users or build a membership program or build new business units, you should be weighing those investments versus I could just put a dollar back into price. And so I think I have been too short- termist on certain issues like membership Uber Uber one for example.

所以,比如网约车的短期杠杆就是价格,对吧?嗯,我们每能省下来用于降低价格的一美元,我都认为是有价值的。即使长期来看你可能想做其他事情,比如获取新用户、建立会员计划或建立新的业务部门,你也应该权衡这些投资与我可以把一美元放回价格中相比。所以我认为我在某些问题上过于短视了,比如会员计划,比如Uber One。

I was running the mobility business. I you're smiling. So I I I suspect you maybe thought of I don't know like well I'm smiling because I said to D, what is the single when I say like biggest disagreement that you've had with Mac that comes to mind first? And he's like say it's from me. Say it's from me. Normally people like anonymize this. Say it's from me. He was reticent about membership programs and I think now he's changed

我当时在负责出行业务。你在笑。所以,我猜你可能是想到了,我不知道,嗯,我笑是因为我跟D说,当我说你和Mac之间最大的分歧时,你最先想到的是什么?他说,就说是我说的。就说是我说的。通常人们会匿名处理这个。就说是我说的。他当时对会员计划持保留态度,我想现在他已经完全改变了。

totally and and I've I've turned out to be wrong. I mean the the the the reason I've changed is because our first of all Uber one is I I think on many metrics one of the more successful membership programs in the world. I mean we're not at like Amazon Prime or Costco levels but we're we're not we're within getting to within spit spitting distance. And from a company lever perspective it's highly efficient. And when we look at efficiency, we usually look on like if I put a dollar in, you know, what am I getting back in terms of topline?

完全改变了,而且我结果证明我错了。我的意思是,我改变的原因是因为,首先,Uber One,我认为在很多指标上,它是世界上最成功的会员计划之一。我的意思是,我们还没到亚马逊Prime或好市多的水平,但我们离得很近,就差一点点。从公司杠杆的角度来看,它非常高效。当我们看效率时,我们通常看,如果我投入一美元,你知道,我在营收方面能得到什么回报?

And it's one of the best levers we have. And the longer out we can measure it, the more efficient it gets and the better it stacks up versus other levers. So you're like, okay, Mac, well, like how did you get that wrong? Like if that's what the data showed you, then why why weren't you just sort of all in on membership? And when he says like when I say I wasn't all in on membership, what I mean by that is like, you know, I would constrain the capital envelope that we would have in the mobility business to invest in this.

这是我们最好的杠杆之一。而且我们能衡量的时间越长,它就越高效,与其他杠杆相比也越有优势。所以你会说,好吧,Mac,那你怎么会搞错呢?如果数据是这样显示的,那你为什么不全力投入会员计划呢?当他说,当我说我没有全力投入会员计划时,我的意思是,你知道,我会限制出行业务中用于投资这方面的资本额度。

So if I had 40 million bucks next quarter to invest, you know, my gut was always like, put as much of that into pricing as you can or put as much of that into driver supply to prove the health of the marketplace so the service is more reliable because like ride sharing at the end of the day is price, reliability, and safety. That's all it is. That's what it was 10 years ago. I think that's what it's going to be 10 years from now.

所以,如果下个季度我有4000万美元可以投资,你知道,我的直觉总是,尽可能多地投入到定价上,或者尽可能多地投入到司机供给上,以证明市场的健康,让服务更可靠,因为拼车归根结底就是价格、可靠性和安全性。就这些。十年前是这样。我想十年后也会是这样。

Even when it's autonomous vehicles, it's like price, reliability, safety. Um, and putting money into something like membership where people get a suite of benefits or part of which is price, but a whole other host of things like you're explicitly choosing not to put that dollar back into price. And that that's just the tension. And I probably was short- termist in my thinking there.

即使到了自动驾驶汽车时代,也还是价格、可靠性、安全性。嗯,把钱投入到像会员计划这样的东西上,人们会得到一系列福利,其中一部分是价格,但还有一大堆其他东西,你是在明确选择不把那美元投回到价格上。这就是矛盾所在。我可能在那方面的想法有点短视。

You said there about dollar leverage, putting in dollars to what you get out. What is the single most efficient dollar in to dollar out business for you today?

你刚才提到了美元杠杆,投入美元看产出。对你来说,今天哪个业务的美元投入产出效率最高?

I think membership is the most efficient long-term consumer lever that we've got. Uh and the reason for that is like ultimately we we are looking at like IGB as a critical input metric for any dollar I deploy. So what's

我认为会员制是我们拥有的最高效的长期消费者杠杆。原因在于,最终我们会将IGB视为我投入每一美元的关键输入指标。那么什么是

incremental gross bookings? Think of it as incremental revenue. Okay? Right? Like if I put a dollar of incentive into the market, if I give Harry a dollar and I give a million other consumers a dollar discount, how much incremental revenue do I get back of that? And by the way, like the ROI on that is different because ROI is like if I get $2 of revenue back from Harry by offering you a dollar, um you might be like, okay, that's great.

增量总预订量?可以将其视为增量收入。明白吗?比如,如果我向市场投入一美元的激励,给哈里一美元,并给一百万名其他消费者一美元的折扣,我能从中获得多少增量收入?顺便说一句,这方面的投资回报率是不同的,因为如果通过给你一美元,我从哈里那里获得两美元的收入,你可能会说,那太好了。

That's a, you know, a 2:1 ratio, but actually we only make 7.5% of your dollar from a profit margin perspective. So you're still negative ROI, but you make those sorts of investments to grow the platform over time because, you know, I've increased Terry's engagement and then your LTB goes up over time. So, um, we

那是一个,你知道,2:1的比例,但实际上从利润率角度看,我们只从你的美元中赚取7.5%。所以仍然是负投资回报率,但你进行这类投资是为了长期增长平台,因为,你知道,我提高了特里的参与度,然后你的LTB随时间增长。所以,我们

原文超出正文长度上限,此处截断——上游还有内容,完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

相似阅读

另一事件,读法相近