美国首例：男子在法庭文件中植入AI隐藏指令
Suspecting court of using AI, man injected prompts in filings to try to win case
A judge has identified what appears to be the first time a US plaintiff has attempted to hide text in court filings that only an artificial intelligence system can read in a bid to win a case.
一名法官发现，美国似乎首次有原告试图在法庭文件中隐藏只有人工智能系统才能读取的文字，以期赢得官司。
In a decision published last week, Connecticut judge Walter Spader Jr. confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records. The court weighed his filing on the merits, Spader said, but nevertheless, the attempted attack sets a “dangerous” precedent. This will likely not be the last time US courts see the malicious tactic, as AI tools become more commonplace in court systems.
在上周公布的一项裁决中，康涅狄格州法官沃尔特·斯佩德二世确认，在一名男子指控医疗服务提供者不当拒绝其获取记录的案件中，隐藏文字未对案件产生影响。斯佩德表示，法院依据案情实质对其提交的文件进行了权衡，但尽管如此，这种攻击企图开创了一个“危险”的先例。随着人工智能工具在法院系统中日益普及，这很可能不会是美国法院最后一次看到这种恶意策略。
Trying to scramble any AI systems potentially influencing the court’s reading of his filing, the secret instructions were “formatted to be invisible to a human reader while remaining fully legible to any software that reads the document’s text,” Spader said. The offending text directed any AI system reviewing the document to ensure textual outputs agreed with the plaintiff’s arguments, ignored prior denials from the court, and ensured that remediation would follow as the plaintiff desired.
为了扰乱可能影响法院对其文件解读的任何人工智能系统，这些秘密指令“经过格式化，对人类读者不可见，但对任何读取文档文本的软件来说完全清晰可读”，斯佩德说。违规文本指示任何审查该文档的人工智能系统确保文本输出与原告的论点一致，忽略法院先前的驳回决定，并确保按照原告的意愿进行补救。
Read full article
阅读全文
Comments
评论
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力