Evercore策略师:美联储加息概率或上升,美股将现熊市
Odds of a Fed Rate Hike May Rise, Emanuel Says
To begin this hour with stocks holding firm near record highs as tech regains momentum, Julian Emanuel of Evercore writing, even as the long term trajectory of stocks remains higher, a bear market will happen. AI does not negate the cycle. It has intensified and potentially elongated the upside. Julian joins us now for more. Julian, great to see you. Thank you for being here. So let's start there. There is this feeling even among bulls that this is as good as it gets.
在科技股重拾涨势、股市接近历史高位之际,开始本小时的节目。Evercore的朱利安·伊曼纽尔写道,即使股市长期轨迹仍在上行,熊市终将到来。人工智能并不能消除周期,它只是加剧并可能延长了上行阶段。现在朱利安加入我们,带来更多分析。朱利安,很高兴见到你,感谢你的到来。让我们从这里开始。即使是看涨者中也有一种感觉,认为这已是最好情况。
That's what we heard, from Nikolai Tangan of, the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. It sounds like you're kind of in that camp. So I think this is one of these times where given the rally that we've had, given the fact that the AI bull market is about to turn four years old, you have to just sort of step back and understand that these things have time frames. Right? If we we've talked about the comparisons with the late nineteen nineties very often, and and in the the year 1999 prior to the top in y two k, you had a 100% higher in the Nasdaq, but four separate 10% pullbacks at the same time.
我们也听到了类似观点,来自挪威主权财富基金的尼古拉·坦根。听起来你似乎也持这种看法。我认为,鉴于我们经历的上涨,鉴于人工智能牛市即将满四年,现在正是需要退一步,明白这些事物都有时间框架的时候,对吧?我们经常谈论与上世纪九十年代末的比较。在2000年见顶之前的1999年,纳斯达克上涨了100%,但同时也出现了四次10%的回调。
If you think about this year, we've had this constant push and pull between AI jitters. We just got through AI jitters in July. And then prior to that, you know, concern about geopolitics. And from our point of view, we think that the market you, said it at the the top of the show that financial conditions are as the loosest that they've been this entire century. We're a little bit concerned about that bit of complacency.
想想今年,我们一直在人工智能的担忧情绪中反复拉锯。我们刚刚在七月经历了人工智能引发的焦虑。在那之前,还有对地缘政治的担忧。从我们的角度看,我们认为市场——你在节目开头提到——金融状况是本世纪最宽松的。我们有点担心这种自满情绪。
There's a different tone to this market also. I was looking at this report from Bespoke Investment Group last night talking about how the S and P 500 has gone the longest stretch of time without an all or nothing type of rally, sort of an everything going in one direction type of rally or sell off, which is for the longest period of time in twenty five years. I mean, it seems like the sort of pistons firing at different speeds have created a highly unusual market.
这个市场还有另一种基调。昨晚我看了Bespoke Investment Group的报告,提到标普500指数已经经历了最长时间没有出现“全有或全无”式的上涨,即所有股票朝同一方向上涨或抛售的情况,这是25年来最长的一次。我的意思是,似乎不同板块以不同速度运转,造就了一个极不寻常的市场。
Is that bound to break down to something more traditional, or is this the new normal? So so incredibly unusual. You know, so unusual that you actually have this enormous cohort of stocks trading inversely to the S and P 500 on a day to day basis. We coined the phrase negative beta. It's the highest name count in the index. Now it's actually over a 100, since 2001. But in our mind, when you look at how this type of bull market progresses, structural tech driven bull markets, what you do get is is in the final stages an all rise condition to your point.
这是否必然会演变成更传统的模式,还是这就是新常态?这太不寻常了。你知道,如此不寻常,以至于你实际上有大量股票在日度基础上与标普500指数反向交易。我们创造了“负贝塔”这个术语。这是指数中名字数量最多的。现在实际上超过100个,自2001年以来。但在我们看来,当你观察这种类型的牛市如何发展时,结构性科技驱动的牛市,你最终会看到的是,在最后阶段出现全面上涨的情况,正如你所说。
And if you look at at these couple of weeks off of the situational awareness trough, you did have mag seven software and semis all rising together. That has stopped in the in the last few days, which is part of, why we're a bit more cautious coming into September, which is always challenging. But we do think you will get all rise before this cycle is over. So if you're concerned, what do you do with that? How do you hedge against this?
如果你看看从“情境意识低谷”反弹的这几周,你确实看到“七巨头”软件和半导体股一起上涨。但在过去几天里,这种情况停止了,这也是为什么我们对进入9月更加谨慎的部分原因,9月总是充满挑战。但我们确实认为,在这个周期结束之前,你会看到全面上涨。所以,如果你担心,你会怎么做?如何对冲这种情况?
So, there's sort of three choices here. You know, essentially, you can let your your cash position build. That dampens the portfolio. You can own optionality. The VIX well, where are we now? Fourteen and fourteen and change. See it. It's unbelievably low. It it it But under the hood, it's not. It under the hood, it's not because you have this negative beta effect, and and you've had, you know, just, like, enormous moves in in individual stocks both up and down and up and down essentially in the same couple of months.
所以,这里大约有三种选择。你知道,基本上,你可以让现金头寸增加。这会降低投资组合的波动性。你可以持有期权。VIX指数,我们现在在哪里?14,14多一点。你看,低得令人难以置信。但在表面之下,并非如此。在表面之下,并非如此,因为你有这种负贝塔效应,而且你看到了,你知道,就像,个股的巨大波动,上下上下,基本上在同样的几个月内。
And and so for us, you know, index protection is very inexpensive here. You get the Fed. You get the midterms. You get Iran. And, you get given the fact that a lot of people are viewing this earning season as as good as it gets, and we wouldn't argue with that. The thought might be that that would prompt a a correction. Studies show the work that we've done shows that it prompts more volatility. It doesn't prompt the end of the bull, but it does prompt this concern.
所以对我们来说,你知道,指数保护在这里非常便宜。你有美联储。你有中期选举。你有伊朗。而且,鉴于很多人认为这个财报季已经好到极致,我们也不会反驳这一点。这种想法可能认为这会引发回调。研究表明,我们做的工作表明,这会引发更多波动。这不会导致牛市结束,但确实引发了这种担忧。
And then the last thing is I would say this negative beta, it's just it's it's remarkable, and it's worked well. And there's energy in it, and there's utilities in it, and health care, which has made new highs in recent weeks also in it, it really dampens portfolio volatility. Do you agree with the consensus that the data this week has been so good enough, let's say, not so good, but good enough that the Fed can stay on hold through September.
然后最后一件事,我想说这种负贝塔,它只是,它很了不起,而且效果很好。其中有能源股,有公用事业股,还有医疗保健股,最近几周创下新高,也在其中,它确实降低了投资组合的波动性。你是否同意共识,即本周的数据已经足够好,比如说,不是太好,但足够好,以至于美联储可以在9月保持按兵不动?
Well, to to be fair and, again, this is one of these perceptions and which is gonna make Jackson Hole very interesting. I don't know who's going to next call, but there there you go. Got my hiking boots. This this will be interesting because, you know, our call is that they actually will stay on hold in September, but it's not clear to me that what the market is pricing right now is the story that wants the market to take into the FOMC meeting.
嗯,公平地说,而且再次强调,这是这些看法之一,这将使杰克逊霍尔会议变得非常有趣。我不知道接下来谁会发言,但就这样吧。我穿上了我的登山靴。这将很有趣,因为,你知道,我们的判断是,他们实际上将在9月保持利率不变,但我不清楚市场目前定价的是否是希望市场带入FOMC会议的故事。
As in there's a little bit too much, call it, complacency around the definitive idea that they're not going to hike. So, you know, prediction markets, whatever, the the Bloomberg would show that I think we're at about a 30% chance now. I think we think that's gonna nudge higher between now and September 16, and and that's one of the things that might unsettle markets as well. The game theory of wanting price in hikes without having to do them and hope that the market can do the work for you.
也就是说,有一点过于自满,可以说是围绕他们不会加息的确定想法。所以,你知道,预测市场,不管怎样,彭博社显示我认为现在概率大约是30%。我认为我们认为在现在到9月16日之间,这个概率会略微上升,这也是可能让市场不安的事情之一。博弈论是想要在不实际加息的情况下将加息预期定价,并希望市场能为你完成工作。
I do wonder, about the idea of rate hikes and why they might be necessary. Beth Hammack has been talking about how they need to act now. And, arguably, based on some of the complacency that you're talking about with the financial conditions index and the leverage that we've seen build up, some people seem to be getting worried that there is this effervescence in markets that needs to be curtailed. The wings of some of the optimism need to be clipped.
我确实想知道关于加息的想法以及为什么它们可能是必要的。贝丝·哈马克一直在谈论他们需要现在就采取行动。而且,可以说,基于你提到的金融状况指数中的一些自满情绪以及我们看到的杠杆积累,有些人似乎开始担心市场中存在这种需要被抑制的泡沫。一些乐观情绪的翅膀需要被修剪。
Do you see excess leverage starting to build at a time where people haven't had the volatility to sort of naturally wash it out? Well, again, this has been one of these sort of narratives that the market has been able to digest to this point. You know, record issuance, okay, against the backdrop of government bond yields rising, which is causing the price of the record issuance, to have to rise as well. And this cycle is even more unusual, and and I know as a as a watcher of the credit markets in particular, what's fascinating is is that high yield credit is much tighter than investment grade because we know where all the issuance is coming from.
你是否看到在人们没有经历波动性来自然洗掉杠杆的时候,过度杠杆开始积累?嗯,再次强调,这是市场到目前为止能够消化的这些叙事之一。你知道,创纪录的发行量,好吧,在政府债券收益率上升的背景下,这导致创纪录发行量的价格也必须上升。而且这个周期甚至更加不寻常,我知道作为特别是信贷市场的观察者,令人着迷的是,高收益信贷比投资级信贷更紧,因为我们知道所有发行量来自哪里。
So, you know, our concern, if there was one in particular, would be if the ten year yield started nudging through four and three quarters towards 5% as the thirty year yield has has made new cycle highs. If you look back on this bull market, that's when stocks do face a bit more of a challenge. Just quickly, have you actually reduced your exposure to US equities? No. What so so the here you well, no. But think about it.
所以,你知道,我们的担忧,如果有一个特别的话,那就是如果十年期收益率开始突破4.75%并向5%迈进,而三十年期收益率已经创下周期新高。如果你回顾这个牛市,那就是股票面临更多挑战的时候。快速问一下,你是否真的减少了对美国股票的风险敞口?没有。那么,所以,嗯,没有。但想想看。
Right? And this is the problem that long term investors make constantly. There's a difference between selling and hedging. Okay? And and look. We have been overweight the technology theme the entirety of this bull market, and it didn't feel very good in March, and it sure as heck didn't feel very good until July 29. But part of that is that because it's a higher beta concept and the returns have been outsized, you should spend a little bit of of your money hedging when the market seems complacent.
对吧?这就是长期投资者经常犯的问题。卖出和对冲是有区别的。明白吗?你看,我们在整个牛市期间一直超配科技主题,在三月份感觉并不好受,直到7月29日之前感觉也绝对不好受。但部分原因在于,因为这是一个高贝塔概念,而且回报一直超乎寻常,当市场显得自满时,你应该花一点钱进行对冲。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力