欧洲AI主权讨论：依赖美国模型与基础设施的现实
Europe talks constantly about AI sovereignty. But in practice, much of the conti…
Europe talks constantly about AI sovereignty. But in practice, much of the continent still seems to want American AI with a European postcode.
欧洲不断谈论AI主权。但实际上，欧洲大陆的许多地方似乎仍然想要带有欧洲邮政编码的美国AI。
Together with Superintelligence co-founder Peter Thum, I sat down with PandaOS co-founders Philipp Türker and Marco Szeidenleder to examine what technological sovereignty actually means when European companies remain dependent on US models, cloud providers, chips, APIs, and infrastructure.
我与Superintelligence联合创始人Peter Thum一起，与PandaOS联合创始人Philipp Türker和Marco Szeidenleder坐下来探讨，当欧洲公司仍然依赖美国模型、云提供商、芯片、API和基础设施时，技术主权实际上意味着什么。
The conversation began with Europe’s recent Anthropic warning shot: what happens when access to a frontier model can suddenly disappear, prices change, or a provider becomes unavailable?
对话始于欧洲最近的Anthropic警告：当访问前沿模型的能力突然消失、价格变动或提供商不可用时，会发生什么？
Philipp and Marco argue that sovereignty should not mean attempting to own every layer of the AI stack. It means maintaining control over the systems and data that are essential to your business—and preserving the ability to switch providers without rebuilding your entire operation.
Philipp和Marco认为，主权不应意味着试图拥有AI堆栈的每一层。它意味着保持对业务至关重要的系统和数据的控制，并保留在不重建整个运营的情况下更换提供商的能力。
Have fun!
玩得开心！
YouTube down below
YouTube在下方
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力