Vitalik发布以太坊L1 Strawmap：隐私与量子安全优先级提升
Vitalik Buterin Puts Privacy And Quantum Safety Higher On Ethereum’s Roadmap
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has shared a comparison between Ethereum’s earlier roadmap and a newer L1 “Strawmap,” highlighting privacy and quantum safety as higher-priority research areas.
以太坊联合创始人维塔利克·布特林分享了对以太坊早期路线图与更新的L1“Strawmap”的比较，强调隐私和量子安全是更高优先级的研究领域。
The post points to several notable changes, including more emphasis on native privacy requirements, keyed nonces, shielded pools, quantum safety, and a move away from Verkle trees toward Poseidon binary trees.
该帖子指出了几个显著变化，包括更加强调原生隐私需求、密钥随机数、屏蔽池、量子安全，以及从Verkle树转向Poseidon二叉树。
This should not be treated as a final Ethereum governance decision.
这不应被视为以太坊的最终治理决策。
The L1 Strawmap is a planning and research tool, not a hard fork commitment. Ethereum’s roadmap evolves through research, implementation, client work, community debate, and eventual upgrade processes.
L1 Strawmap是一个规划和研究工具，不是硬分叉承诺。以太坊的路线图通过研究、实施、客户端工作、社区讨论和最终的升级过程而演变。
Still, when Buterin highlights privacy and quantum safety, the ecosystem pays attention.
尽管如此，当布特林强调隐私和量子安全时，生态系统会予以关注。
Loading Tweet…
正在加载推文…
View original post on X
在X上查看原始帖子
TL;DR
TL;DR
- Vitalik Buterin compared Ethereum’s older roadmap with a newer L1 Strawmap.
- Privacy and quantum safety appear higher in the planning stack.
- The post is research direction, not a binding governance decision.
- 维塔利克·布特林将以太坊的旧路线图与更新的L1 Strawmap进行了比较。
- 隐私和量子安全在规划栈中优先级更高。
- 该帖子是研究方向，不是具有约束力的治理决策。
https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1822262973950150965
https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1822262973950150965
Why Privacy Is Moving Up
为什么隐私优先级上升
Ethereum’s privacy problem has always been obvious.
以太坊的隐私问题一直很明显。
Public blockchains are transparent by default. That is useful for auditability, but it creates problems for payments, payroll, trading, donations, enterprise activity, identity, and personal financial data.
公共区块链默认是透明的。这对可审计性有用，但给支付、工资、交易、捐赠、企业活动、身份和个人财务数据带来了问题。
Most ordinary users do not want their full financial history visible to anyone who knows their wallet address.
大多数普通用户不希望任何知道他们钱包地址的人都能看到他们的完整财务历史。
That is why native privacy keeps returning as a roadmap priority.
这就是为什么原生隐私一直是路线图优先事项的原因。
Keyed nonces, shielded pools, and related tools can help make privacy more practical at the protocol or application layer. The challenge is balancing privacy with compliance, usability, scalability, and security.
密钥随机数、屏蔽池和相关工具可以帮助在协议或应用层使隐私更实用。挑战在于平衡隐私与合规性、可用性、可扩展性和安全性。
Ethereum has avoided quick fixes because privacy is not just a feature. It affects the whole user model.
以太坊避免了快速修复，因为隐私不仅仅是一个功能。它影响整个用户模型。
Quantum Safety Is Becoming Less Theoretical
量子安全变得不那么理论化
Quantum risk has long felt distant.
量子风险长期以来一直感觉遥远。
But serious roadmaps need to think in years, not weeks. If quantum-capable attacks become practical later, networks with enormous value secured by cryptographic assumptions will need transition plans before the threat becomes immediate.
但严肃的路线图需要以年为单位思考，而不是以周为单位。如果量子能力的攻击在未来变得可行，那么以密码学假设保护巨大价值的网络需要在威胁变得紧迫之前制定过渡计划。
That is why moving quantum safety higher in the research stack matters.
这就是为什么将量子安全提升到研究栈更高位置很重要。
It does not mean Ethereum is about to be broken by quantum computers. It means the ecosystem is planning for a future where today’s cryptographic assumptions may need updating.
这并不意味着以太坊即将被量子计算机攻破。这意味着生态系统正在为未来做规划，届时今天的密码学假设可能需要更新。
That kind of preparation is exactly what long-lived base layers should be doing.
这种准备正是长寿基础层应该做的事情。
The Verkle-To-Poseidon Shift Is Technical But Important
Verkle到Poseidon的转变技术性强但很重要
The roadmap comparison also points to a shift away from Verkle trees toward Poseidon binary trees.
路线图对比还指出了从Verkle树向Poseidon二叉树的转变。
For many users, this sounds deeply technical, and it is. But these data-structure choices affect how Ethereum handles state, proofs, scalability, and future compatibility with advanced cryptographic systems.
对许多用户来说，这听起来非常技术化，事实也确实如此。但这些数据结构的选择会影响以太坊如何处理状态、证明、可扩展性以及与高级密码系统的未来兼容性。
Ethereum’s roadmap has always involved hard trade-offs.
以太坊的路线图一直涉及艰难的权衡。
A design that looks attractive in one phase may become less attractive when research evolves. The move toward different tree structures suggests the research community is refining assumptions around proof systems, performance, and long-term upgrade paths.
一个在某个阶段看起来有吸引力的设计，随着研究的发展可能会变得不那么有吸引力。转向不同的树结构表明研究社区正在完善关于证明系统、性能和长期升级路径的假设。
That is normal for Ethereum, but it can feel messy from the outside.
这对以太坊来说是正常的，但从外部看可能会显得混乱。
Not A Hard Fork Announcement
不是硬分叉公告
The key caution is that roadmap discussion is not the same as scheduled activation.
关键的提醒是，路线图讨论并不等同于计划中的激活。
Ethereum does not change because one post says it should. Changes require implementation, testing, client support, community acceptance, and coordination across the ecosystem.
以太坊不会因为一篇帖子说应该改变就改变。改变需要实现、测试、客户端支持、社区接受以及整个生态系统的协调。
The L1 Strawmap helps guide thinking.
L1 Strawmap有助于指导思考。
It does not force validators, developers, apps, or users into a specific upgrade tomorrow.
它不会强迫验证者、开发者、应用或用户明天就进行特定升级。
That is why the right framing is research direction, not policy.
这就是为什么正确的框架是研究方向，而不是政策。
Ethereum’s Long-Term Priorities Are Changing
以太坊的长期优先事项正在改变
The bigger story is that Ethereum’s priorities are maturing.
更大的故事是以太坊的优先事项正在成熟。
The network has already moved through proof-of-stake, scaling layers, fee-market upgrades, and execution improvements. The next decade of Ethereum may focus more on privacy, security against future cryptographic threats, state management, and making the base layer sustainable for billions of users.
网络已经经历了权益证明、扩展层、费用市场升级和执行改进。以太坊的下一个十年可能更侧重于隐私、抵御未来密码学威胁的安全性、状态管理，以及使基础层能够支持数十亿用户。
That is less flashy than a new DeFi cycle, but it is arguably more important.
这比新的DeFi周期更不引人注目，但可以说更重要。
Ethereum is trying to become durable infrastructure.
以太坊正努力成为持久的基础设施。
Buterin’s Strawmap comparison gives a window into what that durability may require: stronger privacy, quantum-aware design, and a willingness to revise technical plans when better options emerge.
Buterin的Strawmap对比让我们得以一窥这种持久性可能需要什么：更强的隐私、量子感知设计，以及在出现更好选择时愿意修改技术计划的意愿。
This article is based on Vitalik Buterin’s public Ethereum L1 Strawmap comparison.
本文基于Vitalik Buterin公开的以太坊L1 Strawmap对比。
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
本文由新闻编辑部撰写，Samuel Rae编辑。
This report is based on publicly available market and on-chain data. at X
本报告基于公开可用的市场和链上数据。在X上
更进一步：量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径，把它变成能交付的工程能力