如何避开劣质山寨币：识别骗局与风险的方法

Most of the altcoins that wiped people out this cycle were rigged from the start, [music] but in many cases, believe it or not, this was entirely predictable. Consider this, roughly 5,000 new tokens launch every single day across the major chains. On pump.fun, an estimated 99% of them are simply built to extract value, not to build [music] anything. And 85% of every token launched in 2025 was already trading below its launch price by February of this year.

So, then, is the coin you're buying a genuine opportunity with good risk reward, or is it a token engineered from day one to turn you into exit liquidity? That's exactly what we're going to look at today. So, whether bull or bear market, I'm going to show you exactly how to separate good risk from bad [music] risk, walk you through all red flags that broadcast a rug before it happens, and hand you a quick process you should run on every single coin before you touch it.

My name is DC, and this is The Coin Bureau. Now, I'm sure you're all aware of crypto's drawdown since right around the time the US president decided to launch a meme coin. So, I won't go into much detail here. But, what's important to note is that even when prices are bleeding, opportunists in crypto continue to look for ways to extract maximum money wherever they can. Estimates of what rug pulls stole in 2025 alone range from $2.8 billion to nearly $6 billion, depending on whose methodology you trust.

And sadly, the watchdogs that used to keep us safe are struggling. That Raider, one of the trackers that used to count this stuff, shut down in November 2025 because the business simply wasn't sustainable. So, the scams are scaling up while we have fewer entities exposing them. And that means the only person reliably protecting your money in 2026 is you. Let's start with a distinction that changes how you should look at every single coin.

A good risk in crypto is a solid team with a real product that may or may not work out. That's investing. You can lose money there and nobody did anything wrong. But a rug is different. A rug is a product built specifically to take your money. And this entire video is about the second kind because the second kind is the one you can and should avoid. And the reason it's avoidable is that engineered extraction leaves fingerprints.

Real projects can't hide bad luck, but rugs have to hide intent, and that very often leaves a trail. On PancakeSwap, an estimated 95% of new liquidity pools end in a rug. We're looking at a market full of nefarious actors with only a handful of real projects scattered between them. So, our job is to tell those apart. And the first place to look is the team. Anonymous teams with no accountability are typically a huge warning sign.

So, watch out for fresh personas specifically designed to cut the links to previous exit histories, rather than an established dev who's built up a 5-year public track record. AI-generated profile pictures, clone biographies, fabricated LinkedIn careers at companies that nobody has ever heard of. And then, now the partnerships. Displaying a company's logo doesn't necessarily mean that that company is involved. So, if a project claims it's in talks with some major name, go and check that name company's own official channels.

If the bigger, more reputable partner hasn't announced it, assume it's fabricated marketing. For example, we saw exactly how far this goes in July of this year with a token called Skepman, where scammers used a compromised fake SpaceX-linked account to fake legitimacy before draining around $135,000. And the craziest part is that forensic firm Bubble Maps has traced the same wallet clusters across multiple failed projects.

The Hogwarts token, Libra, and several others reportedly link back to overlapping operators. These are professionals that continue to run sophisticated operations designed to extract as much capital as they possibly can. So, it's absolutely crucial to check the people behind the project you're considering investing in. And once you've checked the people, check what they've actually built. There are several easy tells in this regard.

No working product, a dead GitHub with no comments, a white paper stuffed with buzzwords that describe nothing that you could in theory potentially one day ever use, or a roadmap that promises absolutely everything and ships precisely nothing. In contrast, real builders leave evidence of their work, code, users, revenue, activity, and keeping on top of all of this, the wallet forensics, the unlock schedules, the contract scans.

This is a full-time job. So, if you don't have 16 hours a day to track it, we've made it a lot easier. Right here on YouTube, you can now access the new CoinBureau Club Light Plan. For just 10 bucks a month, you'll get daily market updates across both crypto and TradFi, our team's read on the best opportunities, and curated updates with only the most important details. Just tap the join button below this video to get started.

Okay, back to avoiding those rugs. The boldest lies are mostly found in the tokenomics. And when it comes to the tokenomics, you always have to be wary of the low float high fully diluted valuation model. So, a project launches with a tiny circulating supply, creating an illusion of scarcity, while the fully diluted valuation, or FDV, implies a total value the token could never actually support. For those unfamiliar, FDV is simply what the market cap would be if every single token were in circulation.

So, when circulating supply is under 10 to 15% of the total, that token is sitting duck for massive dilution. But that's not all. Then comes the cliff. A vesting cliff is typically a 6-to-12-month lockup followed by one enormous release of tokens all at once. And the insiders holding those tokens, they bought in at a fraction of your price, and their cost basis is practically near zero. So, the moment that cliff hits, every rational incentive tells them to dump on you.

Across 2025, an estimated $74 billion in tokens were released through unlocks, according to vesting trackers like Tokenomist. That is a massive supply event, and HOKK token is the textbook case. It launched in December 2024, hit around $500 million in market cap within hours, then collapsed 89%. Why? Well, because 96% of the supply was controlled at launch with 285 pre-sale insiders dumping into a liquidity pool that was just 3% of the token. 285 wallets sitting on the exit and a door barely wide enough for one person.

Regular people never stand a chance in such an environment. And that brings us to the on-chain checks everyone should be carrying out on a regular basis, religiously. As a ballpark figure, if the top 10 wallets are holding more than 20% of the token supply, that's a serious, serious warning sign. In the rugs we just discussed, that concentration hit 80, 90, even 96%. If we take a look at one particular example, Mantra.

In April 2025, its OM token fell around 90% in a single day, erasing over $5 billion in market cap. But, if you followed the steps, checked the on-chain data, and looked at the clear warning signals, signs were there for months. Roughly 90% of supply was held by the team and early investors. And the valuation was pure fantasy, a $6 billion market cap sitting on just $4.2 million in actual DeFi value locked. Now, to be fair, there's some dispute about who pulled the trigger on OM.

The team blamed forced liquidations by an exchange, the exchange blamed colluding accounts. Investigators and on-chain analysts haven't conclusively linked team wallets to the sell-off, though the debate over who triggered it continues. But, here's what's important. The red flag was predicted regardless of who was to blame. So, top-heavy concentration plus evaluation that dwarfs real usage, stay away. Now, beyond concentration, you should be checking three more things on chain.

Liquidity that's only partially locked or locked for a laughable 5 to 10 days

原文超出正文长度上限，此处截断——上游还有内容，完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。