欧洲MiCA生效：Revolut将自动转换USDT，Tether主动退出欧盟市场

On August 31st, 40 million Revolute users in Europe will see something happen to their assets without them having any say in it at all. Any USDT still held on Revolute after that date will be automatically converted into fiat at the market rate. Whether the user authorized the sale or not. And here's the strange thing about this forced sale. Nobody outright banned Tether in Europe. There was no ruling and no press conference from Brussels. the largest stable coin on Earth simply declined to apply for a license to operate.

It seems rather strange for a major stable coin issuer to just walk away from a massive market, right? Well, it is strange and that's because there's so much more to the story than people know. So, today we're going to look at exactly what's happening here, why Europe pre-built the alternative before pulling the plug, and what European Central Bank is actually protecting here. Because, surprise, surprise, it's not you.

My name is DC and this is the Coin Bureau. Okay, let's begin with a timeline on Revolute pulling the plug on Tether. Revolute announced it on July 3rd this year. Tether buys were switched off on July 6th. Deposits stopped being accepted from July 30th and on August 31st the full D-listing lands with that automatic conversion. And when it comes to scope, this applies to the entire European economic area plus Switzerland.

Everywhere else in Revolute's footprint, UST carries on exactly as before. That tells you pretty quickly that this was not Revolute having an opinion about Tether. In November 2025, Revolute received a Micah crypto asset service provider or CASP license from CIC, the Criate Regulator. And under Micah, a licensed CASP is legally prohibited from offering the public any e-money token whose issuer isn't found in the authorized register.

Needless to say, Tether isn't in the register. And as a result, the token had to go. But there's a much more important distinction to be made here. Micah does not make it illegal for you to hold USDT. Self- custody is untouched and peer-to-peer transfers are not affected. Every single legal analysis you can find on this framework will tell you that exactly. The regulation governs venues and issuers, not possessions. So, the asset is legal, but the on-ramp is not, which is in practice a far more effective way of removing something than banning it because nobody ever has to defend a ban in court.

And this raises the question, why did Tether just let this happen? Well, because to get authorized as an e-money token issuer in the EU, you need either a credit institution license or an electronic money institution license. And for the big ones, what Micah calls significant e-oney tokens, you have to park 60% of your reserves as deposits in EU commercial banks. That was the sticking point for Tether. Paulo Arduino has said as much over and over again, and he's even gone so far as to call that requirement dangerous.

His argument is that it forces an issuer to swap the credit risk of shortdated US treasuries for uninsured exposure to commercial banks and EU deposit insurance caps out at €100,000, which against a reserve pool measured in the tens of billions is essentially nothing. And to be fair, he can point to one specific event as evidence that this is bad policy. March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank Circle had $3.3 billion of USDC reserves stuck inside a bank that stopped existing over a weekend.

And USDC, the safe, compliant, regulated one, briefly traded down to about 87. So Arduino's position is that the rule designed to make stable coins safer is the exact same rule that broke a stable coin 3 years ago. And when it comes down to it, he's not wrong. You don't have to like Tether to notice that putting all your money in banks is not exactly good advice. Roughly 80% of USDT's reserve sit in shortated US treasuries and Tether would much rather keep them there.

They also discontinued EURT, the Euro version of USDT rather than just restructuring it with redemptions closing in November 2025. But before we file this under principled resistance, we have to look at one thing. On March 24th this year, Tether announced it had formally engaged a big four firm for its first full independent financial statement audit. Moving beyond the quarterly attestations it's relied on for years, which rather undercuts the idea that Tether is running from scrutiny.

A company that can survive an audit doesn't go looking out for one. Right? So, this shows a company actively choosing its jurisdiction. They're building toward the American framework, specifically the Genius Act signed on July 18th, 2025, which mandates annual audits for any issuer above $50 billion. So, they're walking away from the European one. And this appears to be a deliberate strategic choice. And that decision only works out the way it did because Revolute was the final domino to fall.

The actual trigger date was July 1st, 2026, the day Micah's grandfathering window slammed shut and every transitional arrangement expired. Everything before that was firms getting ahead of it. Coinbase pulled UST for EA users back in December 2024. Crypto.com removed it along with nine other tokens in January 2025. Binance restricted regulated USDT spot pairs in the EA in March 2025 with Kraken and OKX moving in the same window.

Bit Vavo, Bitstamp, and Bit toMe all cleared non-compliant dollar and euro tokens off their books ahead of the deadline. So, by the time Revolute sent that notice, the token had already been swept off essentially every regulated Western venue. Revolute was simply the last consumer surface standing. But there's one other number that might change your outlook on this entire situation, and it has nothing to do with stable coins at all.

Of roughly 1,200 firms previously registered across the EU under national regimes, only around 210 converted to full CASP authorization. That's an 83% attrition rate. And that pattern is clear as day everywhere across the whole EA. Estonia alone went from 641 registered providers in 2021 down to about 40 by early 2025. What if you could trade real US stocks like Apple, Nvidia, or Tesla without leaving your crypto account?

Well, that's the idea behind our tokens from BitGet. These are tokenized stocks backed one to one by real shares. But the key difference is they are actually usable. You can trade them, use them as margin, and even earn dividends instead of just letting them sit in your wallet. So, if you want to check them out for yourself, sign up for BitGet using the link in the description or by scanning this QR code. Only 16 of the world's 100 largest exchanges by volume hold a micro license at all.

So, Europe effectively filtered the entire industry and depending where you stand, this is either a good thing or a bad thing. But Tether is the most valuable thing caught in a net that was catching pretty much everything. Now, the obvious objection here is that removing the world's biggest stable coin from a 450 million person economy should have caused chaos, but it didn't. And the reason it didn't is that the replacement was built first.

Here comes Circle. Circle Mint Europe holds an electronic money institution license from the ACPR, the French regulator granted back in July 2024. And under Micah, that single license passports across the entire block. So USDC became the default compliant crypto dollar in Europe by being the one that filed the paperwork. Then came the institutional signal. On June 30th this year, BNY Melon integrated USDC directly into its digital asset custody platform.

Institutional clients can now hold, transfer, mint, and burn USDC and swap between dollars and USDC without ever leaving the bank's own infrastructure. When the oldest bank in America builds a stable coin into its custody stack, it becomes a permanent feature. On the euro side, the numbers are smaller, but the trajectory is pretty undeniable. EURC, the euro equivalent of USDC, almost doubled in suppl

原文超出正文长度上限，此处截断——上游还有内容，完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。