Solana 是死链吗？SOL/ETH 比率突破 200 日均线

Solana has had a tough [music] 2026 so far. SOL is down over 40% on the year to around $73, while Solana itself has been written off by many as a dead chain [music] that's already had its run. A casino that emptied out once the meme coin tables went cold. And yet, on the 21st of June, the SOL/ETH ratio reclaimed its 200-day moving average for the first time since May 2025. The [music] same traders who left SOL for dead are creeping back in.

There's a story underneath it, too, because if a handful of governance proposals pass, then Solana stops being a casino and SOL starts [music] becoming an asset that actually captures some of the value it creates. So, today, I'm going to break down the comeback signal flashing on the charts, expose the real reason why activity on Solana hasn't been reflected in SOL's price,

[music]

and lay out exactly what has to go right for this trade to hold. My name is Guy, and you're watching The Coin Bureau. Let's start with that aforementioned SOL/ETH ratio. Both assets have been absolutely battered. ETH is down nearly 42% year-to-date, currently sitting around $1,700, while SOL is down around 40%. So, when I say SOL is outperforming, I don't mean it's going up. I mean it's bleeding slower than ETH. And on a relative basis, that's the whole game.

Which brings us to the one chart the smart money is actually watching. The SOL/ETH ratio is simply how much ETH one SOL is worth. Right now, that number is 0.0429. And for those unfamiliar, traders watch this ratio instead of the dollar price because it strips out all the Bitcoin noise. Put simply, when Bitcoin dumps, everything else dumps along with it. But, the ratio tells you which horse the market actually prefers.

When it rises, capital is rotating out of ETH and into SOL. And when it falls, vice versa. Think of it like a betting average. A player's raw stats don't mean much until you compare them to the rest of the league. And this ratio is that comparison. For 13 straight months, SOL was bottom of the league. The ratio collapsed from a May 2025 average of around 0.0705 down to roughly 0.04. That's a 39% relative wipeout against ETH.

But now, it's clawed its way back above its 200-day moving average of 0.041. And that matters because the 200-day moving average is the market's long-term memory. Roughly 9 and 1/2 months of price baked into one line. And reclaiming it is a confirmation that something has shifted in the structure. Quant funds and systematic strategies are literally programmed to add exposure when price crosses that line, which makes it a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

And what's more, SOL's RSI is sitting at 51, dead neutral. In other words, this move is not overbought and there's theoretically room to run before anyone's overextended. Historically, when SOL has broken above this long-term trend line, it has seen strong relative outperformance against ETH. Though, the magnitude and timing of any such move obviously varies. So, momentum is shifting, but a momentum signal is worthless if there's nothing real underneath it.

And this is where it gets interesting because the bears have always had one killer argument. The activity was never the problem. The value was. In Q1 2026, Solana processed 10.1 billion transactions, the highest in its entire history. Daily non-vote transactions average 112.6 million, up 50% on the previous quarter. Its real economic value, the actual fees and tips the network generated, came in at $89.5 million, down just 1% even as SOL's price collapsed 40%.

In April, Solana did $11.49 billion in weekly DEX volume against Ethereum's $7.62 billion, 51% more. And in fact, Solana has led global DEX volume for five straight quarters, settled roughly 76% of all stablecoin transfers, and its real-world asset market has surged past $2.9 billion, closing in on a new all-time high with BlackRock and JP Morgan building directly on its rails. So, the engine is roaring, yet SOL is stalling.

That's because of roughly $10 million in daily ecosystem fees, only about $100,000 actually flows to the protocol itself. The rest gets hoovered up by the apps sitting on top. The app revenue capture ratio hit 382% in Q1, meaning for every dollar the base layer earns, the applications pocket nearly four. Great if you're building a DEX, not so great if you're holding SOL. On top of that, the network keeps printing new tokens through inflation, and the daily burn is a trivial supply keeps expanding while the value leaks out the side.

And the analysts have a nice line for this. Institutions are building on the rails, not buying the price. A great casino where the house barely profits. Now, before we get into the proposals that could actually fix this, a quick word. The market moves fast and keeping up with both crypto and the wider macro picture is a full-time job. If that sounds daunting, then fear not because we've made it a lot easier. Right here on YouTube, you can now access the new Coin Bureau Club Light Plan.

For just $10 a month, you'll get daily market updates across both crypto and TradFi, our team's read on the best opportunities, and curated updates with only the bits that actually matter. So, just tap the join button below this video to get started. Right, back to it. Because this is where the casino tries to become an asset. There are currently three proposals on the table in the form of Solana Improvement Documents or SIMDs to address this issue of value capture, and they tackle the leak from three different angles.

First, SIMD 550. This one cuts inflation faster. Solana already reduces its issuance by 15% a year on the way to a 1.5% floor. This proposal doubles that to 30%, dragging that terminal rate forward from roughly 2032 to early 2029. Essentially, the network turns down the money printer faster, eliminating up to 22 million SOL of future issuance worth around 1.5 billion dollars at current prices. Less dilution means your slice of the pie shrinks more slowly.

Second, SIMD 547. This is Solana's version of the burn mechanism that ETH holders enjoy. It introduces a small resource-based fee on every unit of computational work, and it burns 100% of it. Every swap, every token launch, every AI agent doing its thing permanently destroys a sliver of SOL. Modeling suggests the daily burn could jump from 648 SOL to anywhere between 10,800 and 64,800 during busy periods. So, at periods of peak activity, SOL could actually go deflationary.

And third, there's SIMD 553. This is the most abstract, but arguably the most important because it's the value capture link. It restructures the signature fee so that half of it gets burnt, tying every single transaction directly to supply destruction. The whole point is to make sure that when the network wins, the coin wins, too. Right now, someone can build a billion-dollar app on Solana without that activity pushing SOL up at all.

SIMD 553 tries to weld those two things together. Now, put all three SIMDs together, and you get supply compression from the top, usage-driven burns from below, and demand finally chained to growth. That's the bull case. But, despite those positive signals, there's a very good reason to stay skeptical. Governance is the product here, and governance has already failed at this exact thing. In March 2025, a near-identical proposal called SIMD 228 went to a vote. 74% of stake participated, 61.4% voted yes, yet it still failed because it needed a 66.6% supermajority.

Why? Well, because validators derive the large majority of their revenue from inflation rather than transaction fees. And you're basically asking them to vote away their own paycheck. The follow-up SIMD 411 was abandoned for inactivity. So, this current batch is the third attempt at the same idea. And while third time can be lucky, it's also not a great look that they're having to have yet another go at getting these proposed changes through.

But wait, there's more. Solana's validator count has fallen from over 2,500 in 2023 to

原文超出正文长度上限，此处截断——上游还有内容，完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。