现在买入比特币是否太晚?历史周期与当前市场分析
Is It Too Late to Buy Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is down almost 50% from its high. It peaked at $126,000 back in October and as I record this video, PTC is sitting at $65,000. The fee and greed index just printed 18 deep in extreme fear. Earlier this week, it dipped as low as 8 and the cycle's absolute low was a reading of five back in February. Spot Bitcoin ETFs just bled out $4.4 billion in a record 13-day of continuous outflows. And even Strategy, the company that turned Never Cell into a religion, just sold Bitcoin for the first time in 3 and 1/2 years.
It genuinely looks as if the party was over for good. But here's the thing. Every single person who ever asked, "Is it too late to buy Bitcoin?" thought they'd missed it. At $100, at $1,000, at 20,000, at 69,000, they all said the same thing. And every one of them was early compared to the next person who asked the same question. So today, I'll show you every two late moments in Bitcoin's history and what each of them had in common.
Then I'll give you the bare case until it physically hurts. And by the end, you'll know exactly where we are right now and whether this time is different and if you're actually early or too late. I'm DC and you're watching the Coin Bureau. So, let's set the scene properly because context is everything here. Bitcoin topped out at roughly $126,000 in October 2025 and has since fallen to about $65,000 as of midJune. That's a 48% draw down.
And over the past year, Bitcoin is down nearly 40%. The 14-day RSI is sitting at 34.6, knocking on the door of oversold territory. And for those unfamiliar, RSI is just a momentum indicator. Put simply, when it dips toward 30, an asset is considered beaten down and stretched to the downside. Bitcoin is also trading about 18% below its 200 day moving average. The line traders use to separate a healthy trend from a broken one.
So on every technical level, this looks really bad. The whole sector is riskoff. Sentiment is the worst it's ever been. And the crowd is genuinely asking whether this is the end. Which brings us straight to the pattern that defines this entire question. Let's rewind to 2013. Bitcoin started that year at around $13 and climbed over $1,100 by December. And when it hit $100, people thought they missed the boat. One Reddit user recounting that exact moment put it perfectly.
He said, and I'm quoting, "I remember hearing about it when it was $100 and thinking it's peaked." Another one wrote, "It was in front of all of us, and 99.9% of people missed it. The exchange most people used back then was Mount Gox, and it was so confusing that many people who wanted to buy simply couldn't. To quote one individual, "I couldn't figure it out, so I never bought." Now, fast forward to early 2017. Bitcoin had clawed its way back to $1,000 after a brutal multi-year bare market, and the dominant narrative was tulip mania, a bubble already inflated to dangerous levels.
So, retail was terrified of buying. But eventually, that top turned out to be $19,800 by December, a 20x gain from the 1,000 level in under 12 months. And then came the most famous too late moment of all. Bitcoin collapsed 84% to $3,200 over the following year. And in 2018, the website Bitcoin abitaries logged more death declarations than any year before it. The financial press formally buried it. But if you had bought the absolute worst possible moment, the exact bubble peak of $20,000 and just held, you'd still be up over 500% by October 2025. the worst time in history still won big.
And then we had 2021. Bitcoin reached $69,000 in November and late comers feared the institutions had front run them and the era of massive retail gains was over. Of course, FTX collapsed. Bitcoin fell 78% to $15,500 and instead became the consensus all over again. From that 15,500 bottom to the 2025 high, Bitcoin gained over 700% in under 3 years. So if we look at the historical pattern, the question is it too late isn't a signal of the ultimate top.
It's a recurring feature of every single cycle. Now to keep up with all of this, the cycles, the macro, the onchain data, it's genuinely a full-time job. So if you don't have 16 hours a day to spend glue to a screen, we've made it much easier. Our Coin Gear newsletter breaks down the moves that actually matter, cutting through all of the noise across both crypto and the wider market. It's completely free and the signup link is in the description.
Okay, back to it. Now, we need to address where we actually are because here's the thing about every major bottom in Bitcoin's history. They all feel like this. This almost physical pain to have wasted years believing in an idea that ultimately didn't work. In December 2018, at the $3,200 bottom, the fear and greed index sat in the single digits. Deep extreme fear. In November 2022, at the FTX bottom, same story. extreme fear in the 10 to 15 range and right now we're at 18 and earlier this week it dipped as low as 8.
You only see numbers that low when the market has completely capitulated. But here's the difference, the one that actually separates the cycle from the last few and it's a genuinely genuinely bullish one. This 48% draw down is the shallowest post peak correction in Bitcoin's entire history. 2018 was 84%, 2022 was 78% and this one so far is roughly half that. Analysts attribute this to two things. First, the ETFs. There's now a structural base of long-term allocators providing a flaw that simply didn't exist previously.
Second, macroeconomic factors are driving this sell-off unlike the cryptospecific collapses we saw in other cycles. In 2022, the floor fell out because exchanges and lenders were imploding. FTX, Terra, Celsius, the whole house of cards. But this time, they're no systemic blowups. It's rising Treasury heels and a hawkish Fed pulling capital out of risk assets. And here's the statistical proof that the panic isn't as deep as the price suggests.
According to Bernstein, 61% of Bitcoin's circulating supply hasn't moved in over a year. So, the long-term holders aren't selling. They're just sitting there refusing to flinch through a 48% draw down. But we'd be doing us a disservice if we just handwaved the bare case away. So, let's steal manet properly because the risks are real. First, those ETF outflows. This wasn't a small bubble. Between May and early June, US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a record 30-day outflow streak, draining $4.4 billion.
Galaxy Research 20-day window puts that number even higher at $5.42 billion, the largest in the history of these products. Black Rockck's iBid alone accounted for roughly 75% of that bleed and for the first time since ETFs launched in January 2024, cumulative 2026 flows turned negative. That's a serious signal. Second strategy in an SEC filing dated June 1st. The company formerly known as Micro Strategy disclosed its first net Bitcoin sale since December 2022.
Michael Sailor's company breaking the never sell rule. The bears jumped on it immediately and the stock fell about 6% on the news. Third, the analysts calling for lower. Alex Thorne at Galaxy Research projects a base case floor of 40,000 to $46,000 by late 2026. His reasoning is that Bitcoin's 4-year cycle typically bottoms 12 to 13 months after the peak, and we're only about 8 months past that. Of his 13 historical bottoming indicators, only four have triggered.
Andre Draos at Bitwise sees a max pain scenario at around $48,000. And Cryptoquins warns that true capitulation, a real spike in realized losses, hasn't actually happened yet. So that's the honest bare case and it deserves our attention. But let me counter each piece with the cyclical context on the ETF outflows. Here's Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Belchunis. He called the $4.4 4 billion outflow and I quote totally meaningless against roughly hundred billion in total assets under management.
Lifetime net inflows are still sitting near $55 billion. The outflow streak technically snapped on June 4th with a minimal $3.05 million inflow. And by June 12th, a more meaningfu
原文超出正文长度上限,此处截断——上游还有内容,完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。
更进一步:量化金融体系
看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力