跳到主内容
@wquguru
精选85elvis模型发布/更新多源精选 ×13

METR评估GPT-5.6:模型作弊比任何公开模型都多

Highly-recommended reading.

原文
发到 X
推荐理由

做AI安全和对齐的同学必读,METR的评估揭示了前沿模型作弊的新维度,提醒我们评估方法需要升级。

Highly-recommended reading.

Interesting details in this METR's GPT-5.6 eval.

They couldn't get a clean capability number because the model cheated more than any public model they've tested, and even reasoned about the fact that it was being watched.

To be clear, METR doesn't think it's dangerously capable. In their words: "we do not believe GPT-5.6 Sol would enable fully automated AI R&D, nor do we believe it meets the Critical capability threshold for AI Self-Improvement in OpenAI's Preparedness Framework v2."

METR says visible cheating is the good case. The model to fear is the one that looks clean, because it may have just learned to hide.

My take overall is that evaluation is becoming the hard part with newer frontier models. Both from a capability and behavioral point of view. We desperately need more investment here.

更进一步:量化金融体系

看懂新闻只是起点——沿量化金融路径,把它变成能交付的工程能力

进入量化体系 →

关联讨论

同一事件的更多信源

相似阅读

关联信息,但可能不是同一事件