MicroStrategy卖出32枚BTC，市场恐慌加剧

Michael Saylor just [music] sold some Bitcoin. Yes, the man who built an entire religion around the words never sell just clicked the red button and the market is in freefall with BTC below $70,000 for the first time since April. But, let's keep things in perspective. Strategy sold exactly [music] 32 coins out of more than 843,000. That is roughly 2.5 million dollars out of a 64 billion dollars stack and that tiny [music] almost rounding error number tells us a lot about what is actually breaking right now.

The really crazy part though is that 32 coins detonated this much fear when the real damage is happening somewhere else [music] entirely. So, today we're going to break down exactly what Saylor sold, expose the real pressure underneath this crash, and map out how low this actually [music] goes. My name is Guy and you're watching The Coin Bureau. Okay, you know the deal. Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, is the single largest corporate holder of Bitcoin on the planet.

They hold 843,706 BTC at an average cost basis of around $75,699 per coin. And for years, Saylor's public persona rested largely upon the idea that he, that is Strategy, would never ever sell. Yes, in an industry where taking someone's word for something is rarely a good idea, everyone kind of took his word for it. Now, according to a form 8-K filed with the SEC on the 1st of June, Strategy sold 32 BTC between the 26th and 31st of May at an average price of roughly $77,135 per coin.

The stated purpose was pretty mundane. The proceeds were earmarked to fund distributions on the company's STRC preferred stock, the variable rate stretch series, along with obligations on its other preferred lines. So, put simply, this was a company covering a dividend bill, and that sale represented about 0.004% of their total holdings. Now, I'd imagine it's possible for many of us to lose 0.004% of our net worth down the back of the sofa.

And yet, MSTR cratered. The stock now sits at $136, down 23% on the month, sitting much closer to its 52-week low of $104 than its high of 457. So, why did selling 32 measly Bitcoins do this much damage? Well, it broke the spell. The market was forced for the first time to price in a Saylor who sells. And that cognitive shift was worth far more than $2.5 million in destroyed market cap. The debate, as you can imagine, got incredibly heated.

A Polymarket prediction market with $80 million in volume asked if strategy would sell. When the June disclosure hit, the market descended into chaos over whether the May sale actually counted, with some analysts even calling the resolution mechanism broken. That is how much weight the market put on a single promise being kept. So, you might assume then that Saylor's wobble is the thing dragging Bitcoin down on its latest journey to Goblin Town.

Ooh.

[snorts]

However, that assumption ignores what is actually happening beneath the surface. Because Saylor is just the symbol here, while the actual cause lies elsewhere. Note, the real pressure underneath this market is the institutional bid walking out of the door while everyone's back is turned. Because in case you hadn't noticed, US spot Bitcoin ETFs just posted 12 consecutive trading days of net outflows through to the 2nd of June.

And if you're expecting them to break that streak today, then well, you're a bigger optimist than I am. Now, this is the longest negative streak since these products launched back in January 2024. And cumulatively, it's roughly 3.5 billion dollars bleeding out of the funds. For context, May was the single worst month of the year for the spot Bitcoin ETFs with somewhere between 2.3 and 2.4 billion dollars in net outflows, dramatically reversing the substantial inflows seen in previous months.

The fund that was supposed to be unbreakable, BlackRock's IBIT, saw a single-day outflow of nearly 528 million dollars on the 28th of May, missing its all-time record by less than half a million dollars. So close. There was even a 1.29 billion dollar dark pool block trade on the 26th of May that analysts read as one very large investor sprinting for the exit. So, the truth is that the ETF complex has flipped. It's gone from a source of price support to a source of sell pressure.

And institutions are leaving for a pretty clear-cut reason, the AI trade. While Bitcoin is down 15.1% on the month, the S&P 500 is up 5.26% and the Nasdaq is up 7.85%. Capital is rotating like off a shovel into AI-linked equities. And the opportunity cost of holding Bitcoin has really looked worse. Add in treasury yields that briefly spiked towards 4.7% in late May before pulling back to around 4.5%. Goldman Sachs pushing its rate cut forecast all the way out to December, and escalating geopolitical risk-off sentiment, and you have a perfect drain on crypto's mindshare.

And to make matters worse, the Mt. Gox estate chose this exact week to move 10,422 BTC, around $739 million, out of cold storage. With a final creditor repayment deadline of the 31st of October, and roughly 34,500 coins still overhanging the market, traders are front-running supply that has not even hit yet. Which brings us to the question everyone is asking, "How low do we go?" Well, right now Bitcoin is sitting around $67,000.

The 14-day RSI has collapsed to 21.96, which is deeply oversold territory. Price is trading more than $10,000 below its 50-day moving average, and nearly $13,000 below its 200-day. The Fear & Greed Index, meanwhile, has sunk to 22, not quite the absolute single-digit terror we saw in February, but certainly heading in that direction. So, the line in the sand now is the 65,000 to 68,000 support zone, the make-or-break level.

Bitcoin has already lost the 70 to 72K floor that held this whole consolidation together, and that breach is what triggered the cascade. In the 24 hours into the 2nd of June, the market saw roughly $1.35 billion in liquidations, the largest single-day flush of the year, with longs accounting for somewhere between 86 and 90% of the carnage. And here is why that matters. Derivatives open interest hit a record of around 773,000 BTC before the crash.

The market releveraged on the way up without real spot demand underneath it, which makes for a very fragile setup. When the 70K stop cluster broke, forced selling appeared exactly where buyers should have been and the whole thing fed on itself. Now, if 65k falls on a daily close, analysts are split, but the targets are sobering. Ben Cowen points to the February lows around $62,000. A deeper washout puts 55 to 56,000 on the table and the genuine capitulation crowd whispers about the low 50,000s.

Stop losses are clustered heavily below $65,000, which means a second cascade is already pre-loaded if that floor gives way. In other words, it's not looking good, bruv. But, while the weak hands are leaving, the strong hands are absorbing. A record 15.8 million addresses now hold Bitcoin longer than 155 days. Exchange reserves have fallen to around 2.21 million BTC near multi-year lows, which means the available sell-side supply is pretty thin.

Whales have kept accumulating throughout this year so far. So, this can be interpreted as a transfer of ownership. What analysts at VanEck call a silent IPO. Coins moving from nervous leverage traders into the cold storage of people who will not flinch. Tom Lee called the confluence of a tiny sell by strategy, extreme fear, and record ETF outflows, quote, "classic bottom behavior." Now, this is a dude who so far lost more on ETH than was vaporized in the FTX disaster, but he may have a point nonetheless.

Meanwhile, Saylor's own framing for the sale was that he wanted to quote, "inoculate the market to prove strategy can manage its capital structure while still buying 10 to 20 coins for every one it sells." TD Cowen called the sale economically immaterial, which is certainly true. But, the bear case is equally stark and there's no getting away from it. Peter Schiff and Arca's Jeff Dorman warned that the S

原文超出正文长度上限，此处截断——上游还有内容，完整版见上方「原文 ↗」。